|AAP-1||Feedback Mechanisms||Number of feedback received (including complaints) which have been acted upon||
Feedback mechanisms provide a means for all those affected to comment on and thus indirectly influence programme planning and implementation (see HAP’s ‘participation’ benchmark). They include focus group discussions, surveys, interviews and meetings on ‘lessons learnt’ with a representative sample of all the affected population (see ECB’s Good Enough Guide for tools and Guidance notes 3–4). The findings and the agency’s actions in response to feedback should be systematically shared with the affected population.
|AAP-2||Sharing Information||Number of information products distributed to the affected population through a variety of mechanisms on humanitarian program planning, functioning and progress||
People have a right to accurate and updated information about actions taken on their behalf. Information can reduce anxiety and is an essential foundation of community responsibility and ownership. At a minimum, clusters and agencies should provide a description of the cluster's role and responsibilities, agency’s mandate and project(s), the population’s entitlements and rights, and when and where to access assistance (see HAP’s ‘sharing information’ benchmark). (Sphere Core Standard 1, Guidance Note 4)
|AAP-3||Participation||Number of persons consulted (disaggregated by sex/age) before designing a program/project [alternatively: while implementing the program/project]||
Participation in design of assessments, programmes, evaluations etc, means that a selected segment(s) of the affected populaiton have a direct influence on decision making. Measures should be taken to ensure the participation of members of all groups of affected people – young and old, men and women. Special efforts should be made to include people who are not well represented, are marginalised (e.g. by ethnicity or religion) or otherwise ‘invisible’ (e.g. housebound or in an institution).
|Emergency Shelter and NFI||S1-1-2||S1.1 Access||Number and percentage of households indicating shelter as a priority need||
This indicators collects information on the priority support requested by affected households in order to meet their shelter-related needs. Shelter needs should be disaggregated to capture various solutions
|Emergency Shelter and NFI||S1-1-3||S1.1 Access||Number and percentage of damaged houses / dwellings||
This indicator focuses on the impact of the crisis / disaster on housing structures by degree of damage, enabling the development of a well targetted shelter response and associated response monitoring. Shelter damage category are to be defined at country level as relevant. It is recommended to have three to five levels of damage. (1) No Damage; (2) Partially Damaged; (3) Completely Destroyed.
|Emergency Shelter and NFI||S1-2-1||S1.2 Assistance||Number and percentage of households having received shelter assistance||
This indicator aims to gather disaggregated data on number households supported with shelter assistance grounded in relevant sector standards
|Emergency Shelter and NFI||S1-2-3||S1.2 Assistance||Percentage of beneficiary households using shelter assistance as a means to address other needs||
This indicator evaluates the appropriateness of the type of assistance provided. Beneficiaries of shelter assistance may have used the assistance they receive(d) for a different purpose than originally intended. For instance, beneficiaries may sell or exchange shelter materials in order to address other humanitarian needs such as food, water or health.
|Emergency Shelter and NFI||S1-2-4||S1.2 Assistance||Number of persons / households / communities provided with training related to shelter assistance||
Shelter and non-food item (including energy) training could cover a broad range of issues within the shelter sector. As part of the training evaluation, participants should be asked whether or not they have implemented the learnings from the training.
|Emergency Shelter and NFI||S1-2-5||S1.2 Assistance||Number and percentage of households having recovered adequate shelter without external support||
This indicator measures the degree of self-recovery among the affected household in terms of their shelter situation. For this indicator, shelter actors should define and agree at country level on what is an adequate shelter in this specific context
|Emergency Shelter and NFI||S1-2-6||S1.2 Assistance||Percentage of shelter interventions incorporating hazard mitigation measures||
This indicator aims to evaluate how a disaster risk reduction (DRR) is applied in the shelter response with the aim strengthen the resilience of affected households, specifically in contexts where disasters associated with natural and climate-related hazards are recurrent. Appropriate hazard mitigation measures should be defined/identified at country level.