[{"id":"120861","label":"Number and percentage of CBO leaders in affected areas trained in disaster risk reduction and planning","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-18","code":"R-18","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R3 Capacity Building","description":"\u003Cp\u003ECommunity based organisation leaders can be defined as people who initiate adn manage community groups that benefit people in the community or neighbourhood. If these CBOs are either affected by disaster, or are contributing to humnaitarian response, then the leaders may benefit from skilling up.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1456908702","changed":"1456908702","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey","general_guidance":"Trainees should be both men and women, and the training offered must be useful, relevent and enabling.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"N\/A","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"120860","label":"Number and percentage of micro enterprise owners in affected areas recieved skills training","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-17","code":"R-17","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R3 Capacity Building","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMicro enterprise owners can be identified as people who own, operate and staff their own small and very small businesses. \u0026nbsp;If these enterprises are affected by disaster, the owners may benefit from skilling up in related or new trades\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1456908437","changed":"1456908437","data_sources":"LGU survey","general_guidance":"Trainees should be both men and women, and the training offered must be useful, relevant and enabling.","guidance_baseline":"Number of small and micro-enterprises registered at a local level","guidance_phases":"N\/A","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"7008","label":"Percentage of affected  learning spaces\/schools provided with a functioning solid waste management system","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-28","code":"E-1-28","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools \/ Learning Spaces \u0026nbsp;provided functioning solid waste management system\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools needing a functioning solid waste management system","numerator":"Number of affected  learning spaces\/schools provided a functioning solid waste management system","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1402066840","changed":"1416313189","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, e.g the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"7007","label":"Percentage of affected  learning spaces\/schools with a functioning solid waste management system","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-27","code":"E-1-27","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools \/ Learning Spaces \u0026nbsp;with functioning solid waste management system\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools ","numerator":"Number of affected  learning spaces\/schools with a functioning solid waste management system","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1402066678","changed":"1416313066","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, e.g the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc.","response":"","cross_tagging":"W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"7006","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces provided with adequate hand washing facilities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-26","code":"E-1-26","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAffected Schools \/ Learning Spaces \u0026nbsp;provided with adequate hand washing facilities\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools needing adequate hand washing facilities ","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces provided adequate hand washing facilities","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1402066473","changed":"1416312972","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, e.g the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"7005","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces with adequate hand washing facilities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-25","code":"E-1-25","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAffected Schools \/ Learning Spaces \u0026nbsp;with adequate hand washing facilities\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces with adequate hand washing facilities","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1402066298","changed":"1416312891","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, e.g the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc.","response":"No","cross_tagging":"W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"7004","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces provided with adequate water supplies\/facilities for drinking and personal hygiene","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-24","code":"E-1-24","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAffected Schools \/ Learning Spaces \u0026nbsp;with adequate supplies of safe water for drinking and hygiene purposes\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools needing adequate water supplies\/facilites ","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces provided with adequate water supplies \/facilities for drinking and personal hygiene ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1402064707","changed":"1416312826","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, e.g the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"2774","label":"Number of feedback received (including complaints) which have been acted upon","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/indicator\/aap-1","code":"AAP-1","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management, Early Recovery, Education, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Emergency Telecommunications, Food Security, Health, Logistics, Nutrition, Protection, Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"Feedback Mechanisms","description":"\u003Cp\u003EFeedback mechanisms\u0026nbsp;provide a means for all those affected to comment on and thus indirectly influence programme planning and implementation (see HAP\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;participation\u0026rsquo; benchmark). They include focus group discussions, surveys, interviews and meetings on \u0026lsquo;lessons learnt\u0026rsquo; with a representative sample of all the affected population (see ECB\u0026rsquo;s Good Enough Guide for tools and Guidance notes 3\u0026ndash;4). The findings and the agency\u0026rsquo;s actions in response to feedback should be systematically shared with the affected population. (Sphere Core Standard 1, Guidance Note 2)\u003C\/p\u003E\n\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EPossible examples:\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\n\u003Cul\u003E\n\t\u003Cli\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003E% of women\/girls and % of men\/boys satisfied with the quality and appropriateness of response at the end of the project\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\t\u003Cli\u003E\u003Cstrong style=\u0022line-height: 1.428571429;\u0022\u003E# of text messages received daily and acted upon according to the agreed\/established procedures\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003C\/ul\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of  organisations with formal feedback mechanisms in place","disaggregation":"","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1398760972","changed":"1648466621","data_sources":"Agencies, NGOs, Government, Media, etc","general_guidance":"Feedback mechanisms can take many forms. Whatever the most appropriate channels are should be used; radio talk back programmes, online surveys, sms and twitter inputs, regularised focus group discussions with selected members of the population, suggestions and complaints boxes, designation of sector or camp committees to feedback on specific topics, prioritisation assessments, through dedicated community engagement staff among many other possibilities. Sex, age, ability or other relevant diversity disaggregation of the feedback received is important in order to understand who is most at risk and to take responsible actions. It is important to remember that feedback needs to be collected, digested and acted upon, and then the results of those actions relayed to the population, then another round of feedback can begin on the changed situation. This is the \u0026#039;feedback loop\u0026#039; - an ongoing dialogue between the humanitarian community and the affected population. Remember that much of this is already happening - through food monitors, community outreach programmes, ongoing assessments - the important thing is to keep the feedback loop continuing.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All Phases","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(C) Camp Coordination \/ Management, C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C1.1 Displacement Site Managers, C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C2 Population information management, C2.1 CCCM Mechanisms, C2.2 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.1 Displacement Site Managers, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C3.4 Service Provision - Protection, C3.5 Service Provision - Food and Nutrition, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, C3.7 Protection, C3.8 Access and Movement, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, C4.1 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, (E) Education, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E1.1 Equal Access, E1.2 Facilities and services, E1.3 Protection and Well-being, E2 Teaching and Learning, E2.1 Curricula, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, E3.1 Law and Policy Formulation, E3.2 Recruitment and Selection, E3.3 Supervision, E4 Educational Policy, E4.1 Law and Policy Formulation, (F) Food Security, F1 Food Assistance, F1.1 Cash Transfer, F1.2 Voucher Transfer, F1.3 In-kind Transfer, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F2.1 Cash Transfer, F2.2 Voucher Transfer, F2.3 In-kind Transfer, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F6.1 Food Availability and Agriculture, F6.2 Livestock, F7 Utilization, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, (H) Health, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H3 Communicable diseases, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H4.1 STI \u0026amp; HIV, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H4.3 Sexual violence, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health, (L) Logistics, L1 Volume, L2 Weight, (N) Nutrition, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N1.1 SAM, N1.2 MAM, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, (P) Protection, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children, PC8 Justice for Children, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG2 Develop\/apply SOPs context specific, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG4 Advocacy, awareness, education with affected populations, local authorities, international community, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PG6 Prevention Programming, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, PL1 HLP Documentation, PL2 Access to Land, PL3 HLP Disputes, PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups, P4 (PM) Mine Action, PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW), PM2 Mine and ERW risk education, PM3 Stockpile destruction, PM4 Victim Assistance, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, S1 Shelter, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, (T) Emergency Telecommunications, T1 ICT Performance, T2 ETC Coordination, (W) Water Sanitation Hygiene, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W2 Water Supply, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3 Excreta Disposal, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","threshold":"","comments":"\u2022 Clusters and partners have a formal, appropriate feedback mechanism in place that is discussed and agreed with key stakeholders and publicly communicated. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 The feedback mechanism employed is appropriate and robust enough to deal with (communicate, receive, process, respond to and learn from) complaints. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 Clusters and Lead Agencies\/Advisory Groups (SAG) have oversight of feedback (incl. complaints) mechanism and learn from and react to information received. "},{"id":"2773","label":"Number of persons consulted (disaggregated by sex\/age) before designing a program\/project [alternatively: while implementing the program\/project] ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/aap-3","code":"AAP-3","global_clusters":"Food Security, Health, Logistics, Protection, Nutrition, Water Sanitation Hygiene, Camp Coordination \/ Management, Education, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Emergency Telecommunications, Early Recovery","domain":"Participation","description":"\u003Cp\u003EParticipation in design of assessments, programmes, evaluations etc, means that a selected segment(s) of the affected populaiton have a direct influence on decision making. \u0026nbsp;Measures should be taken to ensure the participation of members of all groups of affected people \u0026ndash; young and old, men and women. Special efforts should be made to include people who are not well represented, are marginalised (e.g. by ethnicity or religion) or otherwise \u0026lsquo;invisible\u0026rsquo; (e.g. housebound or in an institution). The participation of youth and children should be promoted so far as it is in their own best interest and measures taken to ensure that they are not exposed to abuse or harm. (Sphere Core Standard 1, Guidance Note 3)\u003C\/p\u003E\n\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EPossible examples:\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\n\u003Cul\u003E\n\t\u003Cli\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003E# of focus group discussions organized with affected girls, women, boys and men that have been used to influence decisions made on design of assessments, programmes, standards, selection criteria, etc.\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\t\u003Cli\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003E% of female and % of male parents actively participating in the conception and implementation of M\u0026amp;E of education in emergencies services.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003C\/ul\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"number of persons consulted","disaggregation":"","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1398760701","changed":"1494489163","data_sources":"Agencies, NGOs, Government","general_guidance":"Understanding and addressing the barriers to participation faced by different people is critical to balanced participation. How a cluster or organisation enables key stakeholders to play an active role in the decision-making processes that affect them. It is unrealistic to expect an organisation to engage with all stakeholders over all decisions all of the time. Therefore the organisation must have clear guidelines (and practices) enabling it to prioritize stakeholders appropriately and to be responsive to the differences in power between them.  Mechanisms need to be in place to ensure that the most marginalized and affected are represented and have influence. Participation here also encompasses the processes through which an organisation or cluster monitors and reviews its progress and results against goals and objectives; feeds learning back into the organisation on an on-going basis; and reports on the results of the process. To increase accountability to stakeholders, goals and objectives must be also designed in consultation with those stakeholders. A well known example of participation in developing indicators is the WASH indicator developed by a community which was - \u0026quot;# of hours girls spend in school\u0026quot; - highlighting the importance of education to the community, and also that improved water access had improved education possibilities. So the indicator has a measurement of impact built into it, the improved water access as an outcome can be assumed.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All Phases","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(C) Camp Coordination \/ Management, C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C1.1 Displacement Site Managers, C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C2 Population information management, C2.1 CCCM Mechanisms, C2.2 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.1 Displacement Site Managers, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C3.4 Service Provision - Protection, C3.5 Service Provision - Food and Nutrition, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, C3.7 Protection, C3.8 Access and Movement, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, C4.1 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, (E) Education, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E1.1 Equal Access, E1.2 Facilities and services, E1.3 Protection and Well-being, E2 Teaching and Learning, E2.1 Curricula, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, E3.1 Law and Policy Formulation, E3.2 Recruitment and Selection, E3.3 Supervision, E4 Educational Policy, E4.1 Law and Policy Formulation, (F) Food Security, F1 Food Assistance, F1.1 Cash Transfer, F1.2 Voucher Transfer, F1.3 In-kind Transfer, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F2.1 Cash Transfer, F2.2 Voucher Transfer, F2.3 In-kind Transfer, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F6.1 Food Availability and Agriculture, F6.2 Livestock, F7 Utilization, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, (H) Health, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H3 Communicable diseases, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H4.1 STI \u0026amp; HIV, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H4.3 Sexual violence, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health, (L) Logistics, L1 Volume, L2 Weight, (N) Nutrition, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N1.1 SAM, N1.2 MAM, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, (P) Protection, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children, PC8 Justice for Children, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG2 Develop\/apply SOPs context specific, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG4 Advocacy, awareness, education with affected populations, local authorities, international community, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PG6 Prevention Programming, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, PL1 HLP Documentation, PL2 Access to Land, PL3 HLP Disputes, PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups, P4 (PM) Mine Action, PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW), PM2 Mine and ERW risk education, PM3 Stockpile destruction, PM4 Victim Assistance, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, S1 Shelter, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, (T) Emergency Telecommunications, T1 ICT Performance, T2 ETC Coordination, (W) Water Sanitation Hygiene, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W2 Water Supply, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3 Excreta Disposal, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","threshold":"","comments":"\u2022 Organisations document how it speaks with a balanced cross-section of representatives from the affected communities. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 Agency has a verifiable record of how communities (or their representatives) are demonstrably involved and influential in decision-making, implementation and judgement of impact throughout the lifetime of a project.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 Agency has mechanisms in place to monitor and evaluate outcomes and impact and these are reported against (incl. to affected communities). \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 Cluster has a verifiable record of how it identified interest groups in the affected communities, and the power relationships that exist. "},{"id":"2772","label":"Number of information products distributed to the affected population through a variety of mechanisms on humanitarian program planning, functioning and progress","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/aap-2","code":"AAP-2","global_clusters":"Food Security, Health, Logistics, Protection, Nutrition, Water Sanitation Hygiene, Camp Coordination \/ Management, Education, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Emergency Telecommunications, Early Recovery","domain":"Sharing Information","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPeople have a right to accurate and updated information about actions taken on their behalf. Information can reduce anxiety and is an essential foundation of community responsibility and ownership. At a minimum, clusters and agencies should provide a description of the cluster\u0026#39;s role and responsibilities, agency\u0026rsquo;s mandate and project(s), the population\u0026rsquo;s entitlements and rights, and when and where to access assistance (see HAP\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;sharing information\u0026rsquo; benchmark). (Sphere Core Standard 1, Guidance Note 4)\u003C\/p\u003E\n\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EPossible examples:\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\n\u003Cul\u003E\n\t\u003Cli\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003E# of \u0026lsquo;Frequently Asked Questions\u0026rsquo; documents about the work of the cluster disseminated\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\t\u003Cli\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003E# of talkback radio programmes joined to explain response planning and selection criteria of cluster to affected population\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003C\/ul\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"# of information messages delivered","disaggregation":"","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1398760499","changed":"1494488738","data_sources":"Agencies, NGOs, Government","general_guidance":"Common ways of sharing information include noticeboards, public meetings, schools, newspapers, SMS \u0026#039;blasts\u0026#039;, FAQ flyers or radio and TV broadcasts. The information should demonstrate considered understanding of people\u2019s situations and be conveyed in local language(s), using a variety of adapted media so that it is accessible to all those concerned. For example, use spoken communications or pictures for children and adults who cannot read, use uncomplicated language (i.e. understandable to local 12-year-old) and employ a large typeface when printing information for people with visual impairments. Manage meetings so that older people or those with hearing difficulties can hear. Sex, age, ability or other relevant diversity must be considered when preparing information products as is important in order to understand who is able to access information.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All Phases","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(C) Camp Coordination \/ Management, C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C1.1 Displacement Site Managers, C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C2 Population information management, C2.1 CCCM Mechanisms, C2.2 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.1 Displacement Site Managers, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C3.4 Service Provision - Protection, C3.5 Service Provision - Food and Nutrition, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, C3.7 Protection, C3.8 Access and Movement, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, C4.1 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, (E) Education, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E1.1 Equal Access, E1.2 Facilities and services, E1.3 Protection and Well-being, E2 Teaching and Learning, E2.1 Curricula, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, E3.1 Law and Policy Formulation, E3.2 Recruitment and Selection, E3.3 Supervision, E4 Educational Policy, E4.1 Law and Policy Formulation, (F) Food Security, F1 Food Assistance, F1.1 Cash Transfer, F1.2 Voucher Transfer, F1.3 In-kind Transfer, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F2.1 Cash Transfer, F2.2 Voucher Transfer, F2.3 In-kind Transfer, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F6.1 Food Availability and Agriculture, F6.2 Livestock, F7 Utilization, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, (H) Health, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H3 Communicable diseases, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H4.1 STI \u0026amp; HIV, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H4.3 Sexual violence, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health, (L) Logistics, L1 Volume, L2 Weight, (N) Nutrition, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N1.1 SAM, N1.2 MAM, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, (P) Protection, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children, PC8 Justice for Children, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG2 Develop\/apply SOPs context specific, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG4 Advocacy, awareness, education with affected populations, local authorities, international community, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PG6 Prevention Programming, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, PL1 HLP Documentation, PL2 Access to Land, PL3 HLP Disputes, PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups, P4 (PM) Mine Action, PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW), PM2 Mine and ERW risk education, PM3 Stockpile destruction, PM4 Victim Assistance, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, S1 Shelter, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, (T) Emergency Telecommunications, T1 ICT Performance, T2 ETC Coordination, (W) Water Sanitation Hygiene, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W2 Water Supply, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3 Excreta Disposal, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","threshold":"","comments":"\u2022 Information about an organisation\u2019s or cluster\u2019s mission, values, legal status and contact details. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 Information about projects, plans and activities (in particular beneficiary selection criteria and relevant financial information). \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 Regular reports of actual performance in relation to previously agreed goals. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u2022 Specific details for making comments, suggestions or complaints about the cluster or agency\u2019s activities (preferably a named member of staff). "},{"id":"2254","label":"Proportion of pregnant women, children under five and other vulnerable people sleeping under effective insecticide-treated mosquito nets","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-11","code":"W1-11","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.2 Hygiene Practices","description":"\u003Cp\u003EInsecticide-treated nets are nets for hanging over sleeping places, treated with an insecticide that repels, disables and kills mosquitoes coming into contact with them. Conventionally treated nets are effective if they have been retreated correctly within the last six months (or the last yea the case of some chemicals), not washed more than three times since the last treatment and without holes or tears. LLIN\u0026#039;s are effective if they are not older, and have not been washed more often, than recommended by the manufacturer (commonly no more than 20 washes and no more than 3 years old) and are without large holes or tears. Nets should a be of a size and shape that allows them to be hung over the bedding used. Nets are only effective if they are hung correctly, in a way that does not allow gaps through which mosquitoes can enter.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of pregnant women and children under five (or total number of people) in the households visited","numerator":"Nb of pregnant women and children under five (or number of people) reported to sleep under effective insecticide-treated net in the households visited","disaggregation":"SADD","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416229965","data_sources":"household survey","general_guidance":"It is important to see the nets installed in the household and check who actually sleeps under the nets. Possible questions: are there any pregnant women or under-five children in this household? IF \u0026#039;YES\u0026#039;, do you have a mosquito net in your household? IF \u0026#039;YES\u0026#039;, who usually sleeps under it? Can I see the net(s)? Observe the nets: is the net hanging above a bed \/ sleeping mat ? Does it hand in such a way that is do not allow gaps for mosquitoes to enter? Does the net see to be in good conditions ? Ask how old is the net \/ when was it last retreated?","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, (R) Early Recovery, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance","threshold":"In many contexts people will not have access to safe drinking water for part or all of the emergency period, for example when they rely on traditional unprotected water sources or when central systems for water treatment and distribution fail. In these cases, household (or point-of-use) treatment is important for ensuring that water is clean at the point of consumption. Surveyors should check to ensure that all the necessary supplies and equipment are present. For example, if bucket disinfection is used, an additional water container, usually a bucket with a lid, will be required for the process, in addition to containers for collection and storage. Model questions for survey: Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink? IF YES, what do you usually do to the water to make it safer to drink? Did you treat the water that is being used in your household today? IF NO, why not? May I see the product or device please?","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2255","label":"Quantity of water used per person per day for drinking, cooking, hygiene and laundry","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w2-1","code":"W2-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W2.1 Access and Water Quantity","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe quantity of water used per person per day includes all the water collected at public water points, water supplied via household connections water used for laundry or bathing collected from surface water sources or used in situ, rainwater collected at household level etc. Use for drinking, cooking and hygiene includes bathing and laundry but excludes use for livestock, gardening, construction etc.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Litres per person","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316772","data_sources":"household survey","general_guidance":"For each household surveyed, estimate the total volume of the water used per day and ascertain the number of people that household. Add all the daily household use figures and divide by the total number of people belonging to the households in the survey. Alternatively, estimate the total volume of water used per day for each household surveyed, add all the daily household use figures and divide by an estimate of average household size in the population concerned. It is important to try to find out all the sources of water that are being used for drinking, cooking and hygiene, including those that are used at source (e.g. washing clothes at a river). For more rapid assessment, a survey among people at water-collection points could be used, though this may provide biased sample, for instance where surface water sources provide a substantial part of the water used or where some people do not have access to the water-collection points.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, F7 Utilization, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"Context specific","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2256","label":"Likelihood of a critical fall in the quantity of water available per day within the next month","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w2-2","code":"W2-2","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W2.1 Access and Water Quantity","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIt is important to assess the likelihood of a critical fall (temporary or permanent) in water availability on the short term to determine whether or not action needs to be taken to secure supplies or to look for other alternatives to ensure that the population continues to have access to sufficient water for health and livelihoods\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Very likely \/ Somewhat Likely \/ Unlikely","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316850","data_sources":"Key informant, observation","general_guidance":"A critical fall in water availability is defined as a fall that would lead to a reduction in the quantity of water used for drinking, cooking and hygiene below an acceptable level for protecting health. This may also involve a reduction in the quantity of water used for essential livelihoods activities. Water available is the quantity water per person per day that is potentially accessible to the population concerned. Availability may be reduced by events such as falling availability of local water resources at the end of the rainy season, mechanical, financial, logistics or other problems with a managed water-supply system, an increase in the population on sites, security incidents that interrupt a water-tankering operation etc.","guidance_baseline":"Published data such as hydrological and hydrogeological records, and programme reports may also be available.","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery, F7 Utilization, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2257","label":"Proportion of households with access to a source of safe drinking-water","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w2-4","code":"W2-4","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W2.2 Water Quality","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESources of safe drinking-water include boreholes, protected wells and protected springs, adequately treated and prope distributed surface water and rainwater collected on clean surfaces and properly stored. Safe drinking-water is defined by the World Health Organization as water that \u0026#039;does not represent any significant risk to health over a lifetime of consumption, including different sensitivities that may occur between life stages. Those at greatest risk of waterborne disease are infants and young children, people who are debilitated or living under unsanitary conditions and the elderly. Safe drinking-water is suitable for all usual domestic purposes, including personal hygiene. In the context of emergencies, drinking- water may be considered safe when: 1) A sanitary inspection indicates a low risk of faecal contamination, 2) There are no faecal coliforms detectable in any 100-ml sample, 3) For piped water supplies, or for all water supplies at times of risk or presence of diarrhoea epidemic, water is treated with a disinfectant so that there is a free chlorine residual at the tap of 0.5 mg per litre and turbidity is below 5 NTU, 4) No negative health effect is detected due to short-term use of water contaminated by chemical or radiological source and assessment shows no significant probability of such an effect.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of households with access to a source of safe drinking-water","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316929","data_sources":"household survey, direct observation","general_guidance":"It is important to establish in each household whether sufficient safe drinking-water is available for drinking and cooking for all household members. If this is not the case then the result should be recorded as negative. Ensure that respondents clearly identify water that is used for drinking and cooking. Water used solely for laundry and bathing may not need to be of the same quality. Check the water sources mentioned by the respondents in the survey to verify their condition. Where relevant and possible, carry out water-quality analysis and checking of treatment processes. Model questions for survey What is the main source of drinking-water for this household? Do you collect drinking-water from any other sources?","guidance_baseline":"Review Data from Joint monitoring Programme","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F7 Utilization, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","threshold":"In many contexts people will not have access to safe drinking water for part or all of the emergency period, for example when they rely on traditional unprotected water sources or when central systems for water treatment and distribution fail. In these cases, household (or point-of-use) treatment is important for ensuring that water is clean at the point of consumption. Surveyors should check to ensure that all the necessary supplies and equipment are present. For example, if bucket disinfection is used, an additional water container, usually a bucket with a lid, will be required for the process, in addition to containers for collection and storage. Model questions for survey: Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink? IF YES, what do you usually do to the water to make it safer to drink? Did you treat the water that is being used in your household today? IF NO, why not? May I see the product or device please?","comments":"1) The proportion of household is also an indicator on the proportion of people with acces to a source of safe drinking water, indicator which can be then desagregated by sex and age. 2) Depending on contexts and intercluster cooperation, this indicator can be easily adapted for schools \/ child friendly spaces, feeding centres, as well as for health facilities"},{"id":"2258","label":"Proportion of households with access to a functioning toilet","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w3-3","code":"W3-3","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W3.2 Toilet Facilities","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA functioning toilet is one that is fully constructed, in working order, of a type and in a location acceptable to intended users. This definition excludes toilets that do not adequately protect users living areas, drinking-water sources and use from contamination, latrines that are full, toilets that are too dirty to use, toilets with broken superstructures, toilets that are inaccessible or located where people are embarrassed to use them etc. Access is defined by the intended users of the toilets. If they report that all household members can use a clean and private functioning toilet when they need, this means they have access to a functioning toilet.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of households in the same location","numerator":"Nb of households reporting access to a functioning toilet","disaggregation":"Possible disaggregation by sex and age","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317268","data_sources":"household survey","general_guidance":"It is important to measure whether or not people in the population concerned actually have access to a functioning toilet. Access may be limited by a number of technical and social reasons. This indicator describes the extent to which people can relieve themselves comfortably and with dignity, and the extent to which they can avoid contaminating the living environment and drinking-water sources. Where communal latrines are in place, it is advisible to consult separatly women and men about their access to functioning toilets.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nModel questions for survey\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nDo all the members of this household have access to a functioning toilet? \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIF NOT, how many household members do have access, and how many do not for any reason?","guidance_baseline":"Review Data from Joint monitoring Programme","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"In many contexts people will not have access to safe drinking water for part or all of the emergency period, for example when they rely on traditional unprotected water sources or when central systems for water treatment and distribution fail. In these cases, household (or point-of-use) treatment is important for ensuring that water is clean at the point of consumption. Surveyors should check to ensure that all the necessary supplies and equipment are present. For example, if bucket disinfection is used, an additional water container, usually a bucket with a lid, will be required for the process, in addition to containers for collection and storage. Model questions for survey: Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink? IF YES, what do you usually do to the water to make it safer to drink? Did you treat the water that is being used in your household today? IF NO, why not? May I see the product or device please?","comments":"1) The proportion of household is also an indicator on the proportion of people with access to a functioning toilet, indicator which can be then desagregated by sex and age. 2) Depending on contexts and intercluster cooperation, this indicator can be easily adapted for schools \/ child friendly spaces, feeding centres, as well as for health facilities. For these facilities, it is of the utmost importance to disagragate data per sex."},{"id":"2259","label":"Proportion of toilets with functioning and convenient handwashing facilities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w3-4","code":"W3-4","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W3.2 Toilet Facilities","description":"\u003Cp\u003EFunctioning handwashing facilities consist of an adequate and continuous supply of water, with means to wet hands before using soap and then rinse them in clean water after. Convenient handwashing facilities mean that they are located next to the toilet, or at the household where they can be reached directly and within a matter of seconds from the toilet\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of toilets surveyed","numerator":"Nb of toilets with functioning and convenient handwashing facilities (or observed during toilet survey or reported during household survey)","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317285","data_sources":"household survey","general_guidance":"If different household members use different toilets, presence or absence of handwashing facilities should be recorded for each toilet used. Only the main toilet used by each household member should be included in the survey (e.g. if people use a household toilet but sometimes use a public toilet in the market, only the household toilet should be included). Toilet survey (observation) : Where predominantly or exclusively public or communal toilets are used, it may be more convenient to do a survey of toilets and inspect them to check the presence or absence and condition of handwashing facilities. Model questions for survey IF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS REPORT HAVING ACCESS TO A FUNCTIONING TOILET Is there a place for you to wash your hands after using the toilet? Is there always soap and water available? How long does it take to go from the toilet to the place for washing hands?","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, (R) Early Recovery, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"In many contexts people will not have access to safe drinking water for part or all of the emergency period, for example when they rely on traditional unprotected water sources or when central systems for water treatment and distribution fail. In these cases, household (or point-of-use) treatment is important for ensuring that water is clean at the point of consumption. Surveyors should check to ensure that all the necessary supplies and equipment are present. For example, if bucket disinfection is used, an additional water container, usually a bucket with a lid, will be required for the process, in addition to containers for collection and storage. Model questions for survey: Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink? IF YES, what do you usually do to the water to make it safer to drink? Did you treat the water that is being used in your household today? IF NO, why not? May I see the product or device please?","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2158","label":"The affected population takes responsibility for the management and maintenance of facilities as appropriate, and all groups contribute equitably","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w8-3","code":"W8-3","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","description":"\u003Cp\u003EWhere possible, it is good practice to form water and\/or sanitation committees, made up of representatives from the various user groups and half of whose members are women. The functions of these committees are to manage the communal facilities such as water points, public toilets and washing areas, be involved in hygiene promotion activities and also act as a mechanism for ensuring representation and promoting sustainability. In addition, encouraging people from the affected population to take active responsibility for the management and maintenance of facilities helps in the process of social recovery and contributes to sustainability.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Met\/ Partly Met\/ Not Net","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"disaggregated by sex and age","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316721","data_sources":"Key informant, focus group","general_guidance":"Data should be collected through focus-group discussions with different groups from the population concerned, and from key informants in the Camp Coordination and Camp Management cluster and other clusters. This qualitative indicator requires careful measurement, including discussion with a range of informants to make an objective judgment. It is important to take into consideration how conditions change over time, if this indicator is measured during monitoring or periodic review processes, and use the results at local level to encourage improvement.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, (R) Early Recovery, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG6 Prevention Programming, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2261","label":"Proportion of households adopting measures to reduce biological vector-borne disease risk","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w4-2","code":"W4-2","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W4 Vector Control","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator can be seen as a compilation of several indicators related to hygiene practices, mainly, the indicators W1-6, W1-8, W1-10 and W1-11. If , in an household, these four indicators are met, it can be considered, that the measures to reduce biological vector-bonre disease risks have been taken.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of households adopting measures to reduce biological vector-borne disease risk","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317358","data_sources":"household survey, focus group, observation","general_guidance":"See general guidance for indicators W1-6, W1-8, W1-10 and W1-11.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, E1 Access and Learning Environment, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2262","label":"Presence of solid waste on and around the site","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w5-1","code":"W5-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W5 Solid Waste Management","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESubstantial presence is a somewhat subjective judgment, but to classify as such, it should clearly indicate a pattern of habitual disposal of solid waste in an uncontrolled way, or in a controlled but unsafe way (for example, piles of waste to accumulate at street corners). A few scattered plastic bags do not constitute a substantial presence. If the amount of solid waste on the ground has increased significantly due to the crisis, this should also be considered.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Subtantial presence \/ No Substantial Presence","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1401093563","data_sources":"Observation","general_guidance":"The presence of substantial quantities of solid waste on the ground, particularly near living areas and drinking-water sources creates a risk to public health through faecal contamination (as solid waste may often contain children\u0026#039;s faeces and animal faeces), the creation of vector breeding sites (for mosquitoes, rats, flies etc.), fire hazard etc. The distance of 30 m from shelters and water points reflects established guidance on minimum safe distances for protection of drinking-water sources from faecal contamination.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2263","label":"Presence and effectiveness of a solid-waste management system","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w5-2","code":"W5-2","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W5 Solid Waste Management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAn effective solid-waste management system is one that ensures the following: 1)people have a convenient and hygienic place to deposit waste (at household level or in public spaces such as mark distribution centres etc.); 2) waste does not create a significant nuisance or health risk during the period before collection; 3) waste is collected regularly (at least weekly); 4) waste is disposed of at a site and in a way that does not create a nuisance or a health risk. If one or more of these steps is not functioning correctly for all or part of the site, the system may be defined as not meeting current needs. A system may be not operational because of lack of staff, lack of vehicles, lack of money or other resources, or because of other constraints such as insecurity or lack of access.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Fully Operational \/ Partly Operational \/ Not Operational","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1401093687","data_sources":"Key Informant, Focus Group, Observation","general_guidance":"Humanitarian crises may create situations where large quantities of waste are not managed, either because the wastemanagement system is damaged or destroyed or because people are displaced into settlements where there are not established waste management systems. In dense, large settlements, this may quickly cause a build-up of waste in the settlement, with associated public health risks.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2253","label":"Proportion of households where food is safely stored, prepared and consumed","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-10","code":"W1-10","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.2 Hygiene Practices","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESafe food practice involves three main precautions: (1) clean all surfaces in contact with food: wash hands before food preparation and eating, wash cooking and eating utensils, (2) use safe ingredients: use safe water and foodstuffs, wash fresh foods to be eaten raw, (3) store food safely: protect from flies, separate raw and uncooked foods, avoid storing leftovers or cooking a long time before eating.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of household where all three precautions are met","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416315884","data_sources":"household survey","general_guidance":"Ascertain where food and water for the kitchen are obtained from. Observe conditions in the cooking area and check whether sufficient utensils and cooking facilities are available to enable safe food practice. Cross-check with other indicators for data on handwashing and use of safe water. Questions to be asked: The last time you prepared food, what steps did you go through? Is there any food left from the last time you cooked? How long ago did you prepare the food? Can you show me where you keep this food? Observe if the containers are covered.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, (R) Early Recovery, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, F7 Utilization, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2252","label":"Proportion of men, women, boys and girls washing hands with water and soap or substitute after contact with faeces and before contact with food and water","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-9","code":"W1-9","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.2 Hygiene Practices","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator does not measure actual handwashing, as observed in practice or as a demonstration by respondents: this may not be feasible or appropriate in many emergency situations. Respondents\u0026#039; reports of having used soap or a substitute for handwashing at critical times in the past 24 hours is an alternative. Substitutes for soap are wood ash and clean soil or sand. Contact with faeces includes changing babies, picking up children\u0026#039;s faeces and changing and cleaning people in care.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of people surveyed in the sample","numerator":"Nb of people reporting having washed their hands with soap or substitute after contact with faeces and before contact with food and water","disaggregation":"disaggregated by sex and age","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416315838","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"There are two elements to this indicator: 1. handwashing at critical times; 2. use of soap or substitute (which is a proxy for correct handwashing). A positive result should only be reported if both are mentioned by the respondent. Respondents should first be asked if they have soap or a substitute, then asked if they have used it over the previous hours and if so, what for. Surveyors should check answers against the following list of critical times for handwashing, without prompting the respondent there may be other times mentioned (like when washing clothes or dishes): 1) after defecating, 2) after handling children\u0026#039;s faeces or wiping\/washing a child\u0026#039;s bottom, 3) after handling faeces or wiping\/washing the bottom of a sick or elderly relative AND 1) before drawing water, 2) before preparing food 3) before feeding children or sick or elderly relative, 4) before eating. Model questions for survey: Do you have soap \/ ash \/ sand for handwashing? If YES, have you used it today or yesterday? If YES, what did you use it for? Probe to find out when.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, (R) Early Recovery, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, E1 Access and Learning Environment, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, F7 Utilization","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2251","label":"Proportion of men, women, boys and girls who last defecated in a toilet (or whose faeces was last disposed of in a safe manner)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-8","code":"W1-8","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.2 Hygiene Practices","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA hygienic toilet is a facility that is designed, located, built and managed in such a way that users can conveniently ensure their excreta is contained, isolated and\/or treated so that it is not a source of contamination. Typical hygienic toilets include standard types of pit latrine, composting toilets, chemical toilets and flushing toilets with water-borne sewerage or septic tanks, as well as more basic traditional systems used in low-density settlements.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total Nb of individuals in the household sample","numerator":"Nb of individuals who last defecated in a hygienic toilet","disaggregation":"disaggregated by sex and age","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416315793","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"It is difficult to get reliable information about the actual use of toilets during a household survey. It is useful to crosscheck survey data with voting proportions from a pocket chart exercise in a focus-group discussion where people can indicate privately what their hygiene practices are.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nModel questions for survey: 1) at present, where do adult members of this household go to the toilet? Where do children in this household go to the toilet? Are women\u0026#039;s, girls\u0026#039; , boys\u0026#039;and men\u0026#039;s practices different? If so, why (i.e. lack of hygiene awareness or protection \u0026amp; dignity issues preventing certain household members from using the latrines)? \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIf children go to the toilet on the floor or in a nappy, what is done with the faeces? Observe if there is faces around the living area","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, (R) Early Recovery, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2199","label":"Shelter Conditions","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w-7-6","code":"W 7-6","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W7 Aggravating Factors","description":"\u003Cp\u003EUnsanitary shelter conditions include the following: - lack of adequate ventilation, smoke pollution (e.g. from indoor cooking); - inadequate insulation and lack of heating in cold climates, inadequate protection from the sun, inadequate protection from the wind, leaking structures;- infestation by pests and disease vectors (rats, mosquitoes, cockroaches etc.); - lack of basic amenities such as bedding, storage containers etc.; - accident hazards such as unprotected stairwells in multi-storey buildings and lack of structural safety; - lack of privacy (particularly in collective shelters with inadequate partitions between family or household areas) and of personal security.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"qualitative","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416230522","data_sources":"Key informant","general_guidance":"Seek data from key informants in the camp management and camp coordination cluster. Shelter conditions may be verified visually during a household survey, transect walk or other method. Where there is a large variation in shelter conditions for a population on the same site (for example, where some people have remained in their houses and others have moved into a school following a cyclone), an average score should be estimated for the total population concerned and a note made on the variation in conditions in the \u0026#039;notes\u0026#039; box.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, (R) Early Recovery, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"1) Less than 2 m2 of covered floor area per person and unsanitary shelter conditions 2) Less than 2 m2 of covered floor area per person or unsanitary shelter conditions 3) Between 2 m2 and 3.5 m2 of covered floor area per person and sanitary shelter conditions 4) At least 3.5m2 of covered floor area per person and sanitary shelter conditions","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2198","label":"Density of settlement in m2 of total site area per person","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w-7-4","code":"W 7-4","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W7 Aggravating Factors","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe total site area per person includes shelter plots, and the space needed for roads, footpaths, schools, sanitation, firebreaks, markets, distribution areas etc. In longer-term settlements, space for gardening is also included\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"m2\/person","denominator":"Total nb of person","numerator":"Total site area in m2","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416230458","data_sources":"Key informant","general_guidance":"In high-density settlements the significance of WASH problems tends to be greater. Person-to-person contact and the likelihood of disease transmission increases, and the space available for WASH facilities and for people to practice hygiene comfortably and safely is reduced","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, (R) Early Recovery, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"\u0026lt;15 15-30 31-45 \u0026gt;45","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2197","label":"Average number of users per functioning toilet","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w3-2","code":"W3-2","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W3.2 Toilet Facilities","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA functioning toilet is one that is fully constructed, in working order, of a type and in a location acceptable to intended users. This definition excludes toilets that do not adequately protect users living areas, drinking-water sources and use from contamination, latrines that are full, toilets that are too dirty to use, toilets with broken superstructures, toilets that are inaccessible or located where people are embarrassed to use them etc.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Person per Toilet","denominator":"Estimated or counted number of functioning toilets","numerator":"Estimated population at the site","disaggregation":"Possible disaggregation by sex and age","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317150","data_sources":"Key informant, observation","general_guidance":"The number of users per functioning toilet is a crude indicator of the extent to which people have access to toilets, which is important for preventing the spread of faecal diseases. This indicator does not identify actual access to the toilets available","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"Context specific","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2196","label":"Presence of human faeces on the ground on and around the site","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w3-1","code":"W3-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W3.1 Environment","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPresence should clearly be the result of recent scattered defecation by a significant number of people. One isolated stool does not constitute a substantial presence.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317071","data_sources":"Observation","general_guidance":"Surveyors should look for the obvious places where people may go to defecate on the ground. Faeces that were clear deposited more than a few days ago should not be counted; only recently deposited faeces indicate an ongoing problem of access to toilets. Organised open defecation areas that are too close to water sources and living areas or that do not provide adequate protection from contamination should be counted as substantial presence.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, S1.1 Access, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"No Presence","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2245","label":"All groups within the affected population have equitable access to WASH facilities and services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w8-1","code":"W8-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","description":"\u003Cp\u003EGroups within the affected population may include, but not be limited to, men and women of different ages, children, people from different social, economic, livelihoods and ethnic groups, people living with HIV\/AIDS, people with chronic illness, single-headed households, child-headed households and people with disabilities. Different groups may be defined by their different needs, vulnerabilities and capacities. The point is not to carry out an exhaustive breakdown of all the different groups within the population concerned, but to check if any particular group of people is excluded from the WASH response, fully or in part, and to correct the situation if that is the case.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Met\/ Partly Met\/ Not Net","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Breakdown of single sex group discussions conducted with women\/girls, boys\/men and with vulnerable groups of the population","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316412","data_sources":"Key informant, focus group","general_guidance":"Data should be collected through focus-group discussions with different groups from the population concerned, and from key informants in the Camp Coordination and Camp Management cluster and other clusters. This qualitative indicator requires careful measurement, including discussion with a range of informants to make an objective judgment. It is important to take into consideration how conditions change over time, if this indicator is measured during monitoring or periodic review processes, and use the results at local level to encourage improvement. This indicator is important to measure during assessment as well as monitoring, to identify any groups that are exclude from access to WASH facilities and services and who may therefore be particularly at risk.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, E1 Access and Learning Environment, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG6 Prevention Programming, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2246","label":"The WASH response includes effective mechanisms for representative and participatory input from all users at all phases","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w8-2","code":"W8-2","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","description":"\u003Cp\u003ERelevant mechanisms include the use of participatory assessment methods, seeking an understanding of the social diversity of the affected population and the interests of key stakeholders, representation arrangements such as community WASH committees that reflect the range of needs, vulnerabilities and capacities of different groups in the population, and joint planning and monitoring of facilities and services. All phases of the WASH response include the following: assessment, planning, design and location of facilities, training, monitoring and evaluation. This indicator is partly met where mechanisms are still in the process of being established or are only established to a limited extent (for example where water committees have been established but they are not representative or where women\u0026#039;s hygiene groups are in operation but they are used to provide cleaning services and not as a forum for discussion and decision).\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Met\/ Partly Met\/ Not Net","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Number of women, girls, boys and men consulted and\/or represented in WASH committees","key":"","types":"Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316446","data_sources":"Key informant, focus group","general_guidance":"Data should be collected through focus-group discussions with different groups from the population concerned, and from key informants in the Camp Coordination and Camp Management cluster and other clusters. This qualitative indicator requires careful measurement, including discussion with a range of informants to make an objective judgment. It is important to take into consideration how conditions change over time, if this indicator is measured during monitoring or periodic review processes, and use the results at local level to encourage improvemen","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, E1 Access and Learning Environment, (R) Early Recovery, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG6 Prevention Programming, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"This indicator allows monitoring of equitable access, participation and distinct outputs of the assistance provided:"},{"id":"2247","label":"Average total capacity of water collection and storage containers at household level","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-3","code":"W1-3","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.1 Hygiene items","description":"\u003Cp\u003EWater collection and storage containers may include a range of sizes and types of container, including traditional containers, containers made from recycled materials and manufactured containers such as jerricans. Total capacity is the volume, in litres of all the water containers available for collection and storage in the household.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Litres","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416231719","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"Estimate the total capacity (volume) of the water containers for each household in the survey. Add all volumes recorded and divide by the number of households surveyed","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, F7 Utilization","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2260","label":"Degree of vector-borne disease risk","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w4-1","code":"W4-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W4 Vector Control","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMalaria: Malaria is one of the major causes of disease and loss of life in emergencies. This indicator is designed to estimate the risk of malaria to the population concerned in general terms, taking into account the following factors: 1) whether or not the area is endemic for malaria; 2) whether or not it is the malaria season; 3) the degree of immunity of the population; 4) the adequacy of measures in place to control malaria transmission. Control measures include rapid and effective management of malaria cases and prevention of transmission through the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets, the use of repellents, protecting shelters, indoor residual spraying and control of breeding sites. Mosquito-borne diseases other than malaria: diseases such as dengue fever and yellow fever, and other vector-borne diseases such as river blindness and the plague, may be a danger to public health in some circumstances. This indicator is designed to estimate the risk of such diseases to the population concerned in general terms, taking into account the following factors: 1) whether or not the area is endemic for the disease; 2) whether or not it is the season during which the disease is normally transmitted; 3) the degree of immunity of the population; 4) the adequacy of measures in place to control disease transmission. Fly-borne diseases: There is some evidence to suggest that non-biting flies (houseflies, blowflies and several other species) are involved in the transmission of disease by mechanically transferring germs from one place to another, and that the higher the density of flies in a settlement, the greater the intensity of disease transmission. Diseases that may be transmitted by flies include diarrhoeas and other faecal-oral diseases such as typhoid, as well a trachoma. For all of these diseases, flies are just one of a number of pathways of transmission. The density of flies is hard to define in absolute terms. People in the population concerned may report a high (or highest than normal) fly density, though this needs to be interpreted in the context of normal local conditions.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"High \/ Not High","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317336","data_sources":"Key informant, Observation","general_guidance":"Seek data from health professionals, vector-control specialists and malaria specialists in ministry of health, NGOs, Red Cross\/Red Crescent, WHO etc.","guidance_baseline":"Explore prevalence and incidence rates","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, E1 Access and Learning Environment, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2248","label":"Proportion of households with appropriate water treatment supplies and equipment","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-4","code":"W1-4","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.1 Hygiene items","description":"\u003Cp\u003EWater-treatment supplies and equipment includes chemicals for flocculation and disinfection, filter systems and equipment and fuel for boiling. Equipment and supplies are appropriate where they are already known by the population concerned or where they are simple enough for the people concerned to use them safely and effectively with the instructions provided.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of households possessing appropriate water-treatment supplies","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416315967","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"In many contexts people will not have access to safe drinking water for part or all of the emergency period, for example when they rely on traditional unprotected water sources or when central systems for water treatment and distribution fail. In these cases, household (or point-of-use) treatment is important for ensuring that water is clean at the point of consumption. Surveyors should check to ensure that all the necessary supplies and equipment are present. For example, if bucket disinfection is used, an additional water container, usually a bucket with a lid, will be required for the process, in addition to containers for collection and storage. Model questions for survey: Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink? IF YES, what do you usually do to the water to make it safer to drink? Did you treat the water that is being used in your household today? IF NO, why not? May I see the product or device please?","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"E1 Access and Learning Environment, F7 Utilization, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"Depending on contexts and intercluster cooperation, this indicator can be easily adapted for schools \/ child friendly spaces, feeding centres, as well as for health facilities"},{"id":"2249","label":"Proportion of households possessing one or more effective insecticide-treated mosquito nets","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-6","code":"W1-6","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.1 Hygiene items","description":"\u003Cp\u003EInsecticide-treated nets are nets for hanging over sleeping places, treated with an insecticide that repels, disables and kills mosquitoes coming into contact with them. They may be of ordinary netting that is periodically retreated with insecticide, or they may be long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLIN\u0026#039;s), with the insecticide within or bound around the fibres of the netting. Conventionally treated nets are effective if they have been retreated correctly within the last six months (or the last year the case of some chemicals), not washed more than three times since the last treatment and without holes or tears. LLIN\u0026#039;s are effective if they are not older, and have not been washed more often, than recommended by the manufacturer (commonly no more than 20 washes and no more than 3 years old) and are without large holes or tears. Nets should be of a size and shape that allows them to be hung over the bedding used.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of household possessing one or more effective insecticide-treated mosquito nets","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416315645","data_sources":"Focus group discussion","general_guidance":"In malarial areas, people are able to protect themselves from malaria if they possess one or more effective nets for sleeping under. The most vulnerable people in the household are likely to be pregnant women and under-five children anybody whose immunity to malaria is suppressed by infectious disease or malnutrition. There should be sufficient net available to protect these vulnerable people as a minimum. WHO recommends full coverage for all people at risk of malaria where insecticide-treated nets are used for malaria prevention. Nets that are unused, including any that are in unopened packages, should be included. This indicator measures possession of nets, not use. Surveyors may wish to learn why nets are not used, in order to inform hygiene-promotion activities.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2250","label":"Proportion of households where only safe water is used for drinking and cooking","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-7","code":"W1-7","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.2 Hygiene Practices","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESafe water is defined as water that: (1) comes from a protected and\/or treated water supply and\/or is treated at household or point of use; (2) is collected and stored in clean covered or narrow-necked containers; (3) is transferred safely during collection at the water point, when transferring from collection containers to storage, (4) containers and when transferring to containers used for drinking or cooking\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of households where all three criteria of safe water are met","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416315728","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"Ascertain where water for drinking and cooking is collected from and check whether or not any other water sources are used. Observe the presence, type and state of water containers, which should be cleaned at least once per week to be considered clean. Where household or point-of-use treatment is required, ask to see the water-treatment equipment a products used and, if chlorine-based treatment is used, check if there is a free chlorine residual in the water. Model questions for survey: What is the main source of drinking water for members of this household? Do you ever drink water from other sources? If YES, which ones? May I see the containers you use for collecting water, please? Do you store water for drinking in the household? If YES, may I see the containers, please? Observe and check if the containers are covered. Who takes water from these containers? How do you remove water from the drinking water container? What do you use to remove water? Are the water containers cleaned? When were they cleaned last? Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink? IF YES, what do you usually do to the water to make it safer to drink? When did you treat your drinking water the last time using this method? If water is treated by a method other than boiling, may I see the product or device? If blench, chlorine or tap water, test water for free chlorine","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, F7 Utilization, E1 Access and Learning Environment, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"The proportion of household is also an indicator on the proportion of people using safe water, indicator which can be then desagregated by sex and age."},{"id":"2264","label":"Presence of faecal-oral diseases","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w-7-1","code":"W 7-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W7 Aggravating Factors","description":"\u003Cp\u003EFaecal-oral diseases are those diseases that are transmitted by faecal material passing into the mouth, principally via contaminated water, hands and food, and are prevented by improvements in water supply, sanitation and hygiene. The most important of these diseases in most emergencies are various diarrhoeal diseases. Diseases with outbreak risk are those that may spread rapidly and require a rapid response to protect public health. They include cholera, typhoid, shigellosis, and hepatitis A and E. An outbreak, or epidemic, is the occurrence of cases of an illness clearly in excess of what is normally expected in a given area during a given period. Health professionals should be able to define what constitutes an outbreak or epidemy in a specific context for a given disease, given knowledge of previous disease patterns in the same area. The words outbreak and epidemic may have specific and different meanings in some countries but are often used interchangeable The disease incidence rate is the number of new cases for a given population per unit of time (e.g. a week). Health professionals should be able to judge whether incidence rates are high, stable or rising.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Outbreak or epidemic, of faecal-oral disease \/ High or significantly increasing faecal-oral disease incidence rates \/ Stable background incidence of faecal-oral disease","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Prevalence and incidence rates,  disaggregated by sex and age","key":"","types":"Baseline","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316239","data_sources":"Key informant","general_guidance":"The greater the presence of faecal-oral diseases in a population, the greater the risks created by deficiencies in WASH conditions and the higher the priority that should be given to addressing those deficiencies. In addition, persistent high levels of faecal-oral disease in a population indicate ongoing problems with access to WASH facilities and services","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, (R) Early Recovery, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2265","label":"Extent of global acute malnutrition and food insecurity","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w-7-2","code":"W 7-2","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W7 Aggravating Factors","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe global acute malnutrition rate is the percentage of under-five children below 80% (or below -2Z scores) weight for height and\/or with oedema. In the acute stages of an emergency this rate may be estimated approximately in a rapid nutritional assessment with a MUAC (mid-upper arm circumference) survey by nutrition staff. Acute food insecurity: A population or livelihood group is considered acutely food insecure if: 1) people experience a large reduction in their major source of food and are unable to make up the difference through copying strategies; 2) the prevalence of malnutrition is abnormally high for the time of year, and this cannot be accounted for by either health or care factors; 3) a large proportion of the population uses marginal or unsustainable coping strategies; 4) people use \u0026#039;coping\u0026#039; strategies that are damaging their livelihoods in the longer term, or incur some other unacceptable cost, such as acting illegally or immorally. There is no established equivalence between the levels of global acute malnutrition and acute food security used in the scoring system for this indicator. They are used here to indicate food and nutrition problems in very broad terms for informing analysis within the WASH cluster. Very High: Global acute malnutrition \u0026gt;14% among under-fives and\/or acute food insecurity for \u0026gt;75% of the population. High: Global acute malnutrition 10-14% among under-fives and\/or acute food insecurity for 51 75% of the population. Moderate: Global acute malnutrition 5-9% among under-fives and\/or acute food insecurity for 25- 50% of the population. Low: Global acute malnutrition \u0026lt;5% among under-fives and acute food insecurity for \u0026lt;25% of the population\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Low\/ Moderate\/ High\/ Very High","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"disaggregated by sex and age","key":"","types":"Baseline","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316263","data_sources":"Key informant","general_guidance":"Malnutrition and lack of food increase vulnerability to WASH-related diseases and are a key factor in determining the priority of intervention. In addition, acute food insecurity is likely to oblige people to trade resources, including items such as soap, water containers and mosquito nets, in exchange for food.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, (R) Early Recovery, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2266","label":"Access to health service","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w-7-3","code":"W 7-3","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W7 Aggravating Factors","description":"\u003Cp\u003EHealth services are preventive and clinical services that aim to address the main causes of excess mortality and morbidity present in the given context. Access is the ability of the affected population to use to, or be covered by, those services. This may be limited by the capacity of health services (human resources, supplies and equipment, systems and procedures) in relation to the population to be served, and by distance, cost, social exclusion, lack of information etc. An acceptable situation is one in which the capacity of health services and access to those services are such that etc mortality and morbidity can be avoided.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Access \/ No or Limited Access","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316282","data_sources":"Key informant","general_guidance":"Access to health services is a key factor for determining the priority of a WASH intervention. Where access is limited, WASH conditions become more important in influencing mortality and morbidity.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (R) Early Recovery, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2159","label":"Average time required (minutes) for one water collection journey, including travel in each direction and queuing","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w2-3","code":"W2-3","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W2.1 Access and Water Quantity","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETo limit the amount of survey questions asked, it would be sufficient to inquire only about the source of the drinking-water and the time needed for the collection. This may be justified if it can be assumed that most households use the same source for drinking and nondrinking-water. If this is not the case, the source and the time needed to collect the water should be assessed in a separate set of questions because the amount of water not used for drinking determines how much water is available for hygiene purposes. For more rapid assessment, a survey among people at water-collection points could be used.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Minutes","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"Sex and age disaggregation possible","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316879","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"To limit the amount of survey questions asked, it would be sufficient to inquire only about the source of the drinking-water and the time needed for the collection. This may be justified if it can be assumed that most households use the same source for drinking and nondrinking-water. If this is not the case, the source and the time needed to collect the water should be assessed in a separate set of questions because the amount of water not used for drinking determines how much water is available for hygiene purposes. For more rapid assessment, a survey among people at water-collection points could be used. Model questions for survey How long does it take you to go to your main water source, get water, and come back?","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F7 Utilization, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"Context specific","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2160","label":"Proportion of toilets that are clean","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w3-5","code":"W3-5","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W3.2 Toilet Facilities","description":"\u003Cp\u003EClean toilets are those that are free from faeces inside and around the structure itself, including the squatting plate. Toilets where there are traces of faeces, urine or anal cleansing materials from careless use or incomplete cleaning should be considered clean, as opposed to those with stools inside or outside. Toilets that have a very strong bad smell inside may also be considered dirty by users and if so should be defined as dirty for this indicator.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of toilets surveyed","numerator":"Nb of clean toilets","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317295","data_sources":"Observation","general_guidance":"Cleanliness of toilets can be checked during a household survey or a dedicated toilet survey (particularly where there are many public toilets not associated with specific households). Toilets that are clean because they are clearly not in use should not be included in the sample","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"In many contexts people will not have access to safe drinking water for part or all of the emergency period, for example when they rely on traditional unprotected water sources or when central systems for water treatment and distribution fail. In these cases, household (or point-of-use) treatment is important for ensuring that water is clean at the point of consumption. Surveyors should check to ensure that all the necessary supplies and equipment are present. For example, if bucket disinfection is used, an additional water container, usually a bucket with a lid, will be required for the process, in addition to containers for collection and storage. Model questions for survey: Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink? IF YES, what do you usually do to the water to make it safer to drink? Did you treat the water that is being used in your household today? IF NO, why not? May I see the product or device please?","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2161","label":"Presence of stagnant water on and around the site","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w-6-1","code":"W 6-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W6 Drainage","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA substantial presence may be a large body of standing water such as a pond, a high density of small areas such as water standing in tyre tracks. If the standing water is contaminated wastewater then even small quantities should be considered as significant. Small puddles of rainwater that dry up after a day or so should not be considered a substantial presence.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Subtantial presence \/ No Substantial Presence","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316194","data_sources":"Observation","general_guidance":"Stagnant water may include wastewater, rainwater, natural water bodies and standing water that remains after flooding. The presence of substantial quantities of standing water in and around a site, particularly near living areas and drinking water sources creates a risk to public health through faecal contamination (wastewater and run-off may often be faecal contaminated), the creation of vector breeding sites (for mosquitoes, flies etc.), drowning hazard etc. Although mosquitoes and other insect vectors may travel up to several kilometres from their breeding sites, the closer people are to the breeding sites the more likely it is that there will be contact with the vectors. For most concentrated settlements, standing water that is at least 30m from living areas is effectively outside the perimeter of the settlement.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"H6 Environmental Health, C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2162","label":"Nb of people on the site","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w-7-5","code":"W 7-5","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W7 Aggravating Factors","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe number of people on the site is the number of people residing continuously at the site and does not include people who may be registered at the site but who are not physically present, as in the case of a village with scattered outlying houses.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number of people","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Disaggregation by sex ","key":"","types":"Baseline","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416230487","data_sources":"Key informant","general_guidance":"The larger the settlement, the greater the importance of WASH because of the number of people affected and because of the impact of deficiencies in WASH provision. Very large settlements such as urban areas and large camps create particular problems for WASH: it is more difficult to control environmental health risks, establish community-based hygiene promotion activities and promote community participation in the management of facilities. Very large settlements may also place unsustainable demands on limited natural resources, including water resources, and create a large burden of waste to be managed in the local environment. Data should be collected from key informants in the camp management and camp coordination cluster. The figure for number of people on the site may be verified with data used by the shelter and nutrition clusters for distributions, and estimates from surveys. Figures in the score range may need to be adjusted to reflect national or local norms and patterns of settlement.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, (R) Early Recovery, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"\u0026gt;10000 5000-10000 1000-5000 \u0026lt;1000","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2191","label":"Proportion of households possessing soap","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-1","code":"W1-1","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.1 Hygiene items","description":"\u003Cp\u003EUse of soap in handwashing helps to reduce diarrhoeal transmission. Although substitute such as ash may be as effective, soap encourages handwashing. Make sure it is present at household level is an important public health intervention.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of households possessing soap","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416229594","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"It is important to see the soap to verify its presence in the household. If the respondent cannot locate and show the soap within a minute or so, this probably means that it has been borrowed from another household and should be discounted.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, S2.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"Depending on contexts and intercluster cooperation, this indicator can be easily adapted for schools \/ child friendly spaces, feeding centres, as well as for health facilities"},{"id":"2192","label":"Proportion of households possessing at least one clean narrow-necked or covered water container for drinking-water","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-2","code":"W1-2","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.1 Hygiene items","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENarrow-necked or covered water containers include jerricans and buckets with tight-filling lid and tap or pouring hole, so as to prevent people (including children) from putting their hands or contaminated objects into the container. Container should be clean in the sense of being free from visible dirt and should have been washed within the last week.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total nb of households in the sample","numerator":"Nb of households possessing suitable water container","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1401089536","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"Before starting the survey, surveyors should look at the types of water containers typically being used and agree on what they will record as acceptable and unacceptable containers. If the container has not been washed within the past week but there is no visible dirt, which may often be the case if the container is relatively new or the water supply is clear and chlorinated, it should be recorded as clean. If it is observed that suitable water containers are present in the household but are not in use or are being used for other purposes such as storing food, surveyors should discuss this to find out why. Unless there are important reasons why the container is not used for drinking water then it should be recorded as present. For more rapid assessment, a survey of water containers brought to water-collection points could substitute for a household survey although here may not be a representative sample of water containers at any water point.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H3 Communicable diseases, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, S2.1 Access, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, S2.2 Assistance, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"Follow-up of trends. Target: 100%","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2193","label":"Accessibility of appropriate sanitary protection materials for menstruation, and underwear, for women and girls","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w1-5","code":"W1-5","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W1.1 Hygiene items","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAppropriate sanitary protection materials are the materials that women and girls are accustomed to using in normal circumstances, in sufficient quantities and of an acceptable quality. Convenient and private places for washing and drying reusable cloths may also be necessary in some circumstances. Widespread lack of access means that it is difficult or impossible to get access to materials because they are simply not available or not affordable. Some lack of access means that it is generally possible to procure materials but that this is significantly more difficult than before the crisis or that some groups of women and girls cannot procure suitable materials.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416230039","data_sources":"Focus group discussion","general_guidance":"Normal methods for procuring sanitary protection materials for menstruation may be disrupted by a disaster and, where washable cloths are used, facilities for washing and drying cloths correctly and privately may be lacking. The resulting lack of access to appropriate materials and underwear may lead to situations of embarrassment and distress, affecting girls and women\u0026#039;s access to education, economic or social activities.  In some cases,it increases the risk of infectious disease through the reuse of incorrectly washed and dried cloths and underwear. In order to get information on the availability of sanitary protection and on the type of female hygiene material being used in the community, focus group discussions should be conducted with adolescent gitls and women of reproductive age, preferably broken down by age , including, where  deemed important, female members of ethnic or religious minorities.  Due to the sensitive nature of the issue, the consultation should be carried by a female staff member.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"E1 Access and Learning Environment, S2.1 Access, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, S2.2 Assistance, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2194","label":"Access to appropriate bathing facilities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w2-5","code":"W2-5","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W2.3 Water Facilities","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator is expressed in qualitative terms, but some quantitative data may be used, such as the number of people per public bathing cubicle or the number of households with a bathing place.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"None \/ limited \/ sufficient","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Disagregation by sex of the # of communal bathing facilities availbale, respecting a ratio of 6 doors for women and 4 doors for men","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416316970","data_sources":"Key informant, focus group, observation","general_guidance":"Appropriate bathing facilities may include bathrooms, showers and other bathing areas at household level, or communal facilities where this is not possible or not the preferred option for the population. To be appropriate, they must be accessible to all users, provide sufficient privacy and safety, have a convenient supply of water and be easy to maintain a clean and hygienic state, including the correct disposal of wastewater. Communal facilities need to be separated by sex, respecting a ratio of 6 doors for women against 4 doors for men, differentiated with use of a pictogramm, lockable from the inside and with light. In order to be safe, their location and their design  should be determined based on the needs expressed by the female and male users.  Sufficient access is a level of access that allows people to bathe as frequently as they would under normal circumstance","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, (R) Early Recovery, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1 Shelter, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"Context specific","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2195","label":"Access to appropraite laundry facilities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/w2-6","code":"W2-6","global_clusters":"Water Sanitation Hygiene","domain":"W2.3 Water Facilities","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator is expressed in qualitative terms, but some quantitative data may be used, such as the number of people per public washing basin. The scoring range for this indicator only goes as far as \u0026#039;2\u0026#039;, which reflects its relative lack of importance compared with most other indicators.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"None \/ limited \/ sufficient","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1395064157","changed":"1416317011","data_sources":"Key informant, focus group, observation","general_guidance":"Appropriate laundry facilities may include equipment (buckets, basins etc.) at household level, suitable locations by the side of water bodies (avoiding the risk of contaminating drinking-water) where this is normal practice, or communal. Appropriate laundry facilities. To be appropriate, they must be accessible to all users, provide sufficient safety, have a convenient supply of water and be easy to maintain in a clean and hygienic state, including the correct disposal of wastewater. The issue of private laundry areas for women and girls to wash and dry under-garments and sanitary cloths is addressed in the following indicator: Accessibility of appropriate sanitary protection materials for menstruation, and underwear, for women and girls. Sufficient access is a level of access that allows people to wash clothes and bedding as frequently as they would under normal circumstances.","guidance_baseline":"N\/A","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H3 Communicable diseases, H6 Environmental Health, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, (R) Early Recovery, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","threshold":"Context specific","comments":"N\/A"},{"id":"2128","label":"Percentage and number of affected Schools\/learning spaces provided education kits","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-10","code":"E-1-10","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EEducation Kits distributed\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning spaces ","numerator":"Number of affected Schools\/learning spaces  provided education kits","disaggregation":"By geographic location ( ie administrative boundary),  Kit type (School kits, recreation kits, teacher kits, student kits, sanitation kits), School type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), number of kits per school ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424859257","data_sources":"Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"There are different typs of kits which can be defined locally and what it contains may differ. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"Recreation Kits:  A box with materials that enables children to participate in team sports and games under the guidance of a teacher. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThe Early Childhood Development Kit: The Kit contains materials to help caregivers create a safe learning enviornment for up to 50 young children ages 0-6\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIf formal curriculum materials are not available work with MoE officials and partners to identify numbers and types of pre-packaged kits needed for affected locations. If not already completed during the emergency education preparedness phase, with MoE and partners, localize, adapt and translate into appropriate local languages emergency education teacher\u0026#039;s guides and curriculum materials to be used in conjunction with each pre-packaged kit. Develop a localized version of the Early Childhood Education Kit if it was not done during preparedness phase.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIn collaboration with MoE counterparts and partners, identify the key supplies needed to restart educational activities. With Supply Officer, identify the sources of potential supplies. Consider pre-positioned supplies and existing stocks of supplies from the regular country programme that can be diverted to meet emergency needs. Decide whether to order supplies locally or offshore, based on availability, quality, cost and delivery time. Get cost estimates from the Supply Officer, including freight, warehousing, and delivery costs. Identify funding sources and ensure there is sufficient funding available for the supply requirements. Complete supply requisition\/PGM in ProMS. Include information on the target arrival date at the final destination or port of entry Follow up to ensure timely delivery and distribution of supplies. If there are obstacles to delivery due to the emergency, work with NGOs and CBOs and other partners to find alternative ways to deliver supplies. Monitor delivery of supplies to ensure arrival, quality and proper use."},{"id":"2127","label":"Percentage of schools\/learning spaces that lost learning materials","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-07","code":"E-1-07","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools that have lost learning materials\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of affected schools\/learning spaces","numerator":"# of affected school buildings that lost learning materials","disaggregation":"by geographic location (ie administrative boundary), Type of school\/learning space (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), # classrooms","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424859152","data_sources":"MoE, Secondary Data Review, NA Assessment","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"NA Baseline and Phase 4\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThere is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"No","cross_tagging":"S2.1 Access","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2126","label":"Percentage of affeceted schools\/learning spaces with adequate quantites of safe water for drinking and personal hygiene ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-23","code":"E-1-23","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAffected schools with adequate supplies of safe water for drinking and hygiene purposes\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total number of Schools\/adequate quantites of safe water for drinking and personal hygiene in affected area","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces with adequate quantites of safe water for drinking and personal hygiene ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1416312669","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"2125","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces with peacebuilding programs ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-08","code":"E-2-08","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools with peacebuilding programs\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning spaces ","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces with peacebuilding programs ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402044904","data_sources":"Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, R4 Governance, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See Peace Education Programme Materials http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1117\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSee also guidance on Protecting Education in Countries Affected by Conflict - Booklet 6 - Education for Building Peace  http:\/\/education.humanitarianresponse.info\/system\/files\/documents\/files\/Cluster%20booklet%206%20-%20Education%20for%20Buidling%20Peace_0.pdf\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2124","label":"Percentage of affected s affected schools\/learning spaces with active recreational sports education programs for boys and girls ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-210","code":"E-2.10","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools\/learning spaces with active recreational sports education programs for boys and girls\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning spaces ","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces with active recreational sports education programs for boys and girls ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402045361","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4.1 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, R4 Governance, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"2200","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-03","code":"E-1-03","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator gives information on affected school buildings  This indicator should breaks down damaged and\/or destroyed by degree of damage.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of school buildings\/learning spaces in affected  area","numerator":"# of affected  school buildings\/learning spaces","disaggregation":"by geographic location, school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), # classrooms , Damage category ((i) No Damage; (ii) Partially Damaged; (iii) Completely Destroyed); note if the school is co-ed, male or female","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424858970","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"Damage categories my by locally defined and defined by the local government.  \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSuggeted Damage categories are \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nNo Damage\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nPartially Damaged \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nCompletely Destroyed\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n*note if the school is co-ed, male or female","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access, PC3 Sexual violence, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, PC3 Sexual violence","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"It is important to continue to ask the question:  In countries where girls and boys schools are separated are we able to know which group is particularly affected by the lack of proper school facilities?"},{"id":"2201","label":"Percentage of damaged or occupied education facilities rehabilitated and reopened in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-06","code":"E-1-06","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator gives information on education facilities re-opend\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education facilities","denominator":"Total # of affected education facilities ","numerator":"# affected education facilities rehabilitated","disaggregation":"Geographic location ( ie admisitrative boundary), Type of school\/learning space (sex \/primary, secondary, tertiary) # classrooms, # of  children by age and sex","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424859112","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, C4.1 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, PC3 Sexual violence, PG6 Prevention Programming","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2129","label":"Number of incidents where formal and informal education facilities, students, teachers and other education personnel have been attacked","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-15","code":"E-1-15","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.3 Protection and Well-being","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools that have been attacked\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"attack incidents","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of incidents where formal and informal education facilities, students, teachers and other education personnel have been attacked","disaggregation":"Geographic Location ( ie administrative boundary); Type of incident\/ date (time period); Type of Incident - Learning spaces\/ Schools\/ teachers\/ students\/ education personnel\/Age\/sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1401864993","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"need to cover the number of incidents in specific time periods to see if incidents are reducing or increasing.  Part of MRM reporting","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(P) Protection, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, PC6 Child Labour, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW), P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2130","label":"Percentage of schools\/learning spaces structures that meet the mimumun safe construction standards","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-19","code":"E-1-19","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools\/learning spaces meet safe construction standards\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total number of schools\/learning spaces in affected area","numerator":"Number of school \/learning space structures that meeting the minimum stafe construction standards in affected area","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1415967630","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"PC3 Sexual violence","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See Guidance Notes on Safer School Construction: The Guidance Notes briefly address the need and rationale for safer school buildings; recommend a series of suggested steps that highlight key points that should be considered when planning a safer school construction and\/or retrofitting initiative; and identify basic design principles and requirements a school building must meet to provide a greater level of protection. Finally, the Guidance Notes provide a list of key resources for more detailed, technical and context-specific information. http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1005"},{"id":"2131","label":"Percentage of schools\/learning spaces accessible for children with physical and or learning disabilities ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-20","code":"E-1-20","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools accessible for children with disabilites (physical and or learning disabiliies)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning space","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces accessible for children with physical and or learning disabilities ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1401865318","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE Pocket Guide to Supporting Learners with Disabilities  which offers practical ideas for including children and young people with disabilities.http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1138\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSee Pocket Guide to Supporting Learners with Disabilities Implementation Tools for useful resources and tools: http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1139"},{"id":"2132","label":"Percentage of affected marganalised children (3-18 years) attending school?","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-21","code":"E-1-21","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMarganlised children attending school. Marganalised to be defined locally\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Children ","denominator":"Total number of affected marganalised children (3-18 years) in affected area","numerator":"Number of affected marganalised children (3-18 years) affending school ","disaggregation":"by geographic location (ie administrative boundary), age and sex, school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1401865521","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, P5 Vulnerability, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See Pocket Guide to Inclusive Education http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1007"},{"id":"2133","label":"Percentage of affected Teachers and other Education Personnel receving pschosocial support ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-22","code":"E-1-22","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.3 Protection and Well-being","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAffected education personnel receiving psychosocial support\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel ","denominator":"Total Number of affected Teachers and Education Personnel","numerator":"Number of affected Teachers and other Education Personnel receving pschosocial support ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school level (primary, secondary, tertiary), sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1401865736","data_sources":"Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, (P) Protection, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE Psychosocial support guidance and implementing materials\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1065 \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1104"},{"id":"2134","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces promoting health and hygiene including sexual and reproductive health and HIV AIDS","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-09","code":"E-2-09","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools with health programs\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning spaces ","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces promoting health and hygiene including sexual and reproductive health and HIV AIDS","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1416313341","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, R4 Governance, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), P5 Vulnerability, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W4 Vector Control, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See guidance  and implmenting materials on on HIV in Education in Emergencies \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1140    \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1100\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1060\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2135","label":"Ratio of affected teachers teaching in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-3-2","code":"E-3-2","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E3.2 Recruitment and Selection","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETeacher Ratio in affected area.  Knowing the existing ration of female and male teachers could help identify imbalances which could help inform the recruitment and selection process.  Note target will depend on pre-crisis data. Please refer to the FODs where available.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"# affected Male Teachers teaching ","numerator":"# of affected  Female Teachers teaching","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school level (primary, secondary, tertiary), sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402046476","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"1 = gender equality\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThe closer to 0, the more females are under-represented\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u0026gt;1 = males are under-represented"},{"id":"2136","label":"Number of new teachers required for affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-3-3","code":"E-3-3","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E3.2 Recruitment and Selection","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of new teachers required\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of new teachers required for affected area","disaggregation":"Geography( ie. Administrative boundary), sex and school level (ECD\/ primary\/ secondary\/ tertiary\/ non formal)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402046583","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2137","label":"Number of new facilitators\/volunteers\/peer educators recruited for affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-3-4","code":"E-3-4","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E3.2 Recruitment and Selection","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of other classroom staff recruited\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of new facilitators\/volunteers\/peer educators recruited for affected area","disaggregation":"Geography (ie. Administrative boundary), sex and job title, school level (ECD\/ primary\/ secondary\/ tertiary\/ non formal)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402046750","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2206","label":"Percentage of affected teachers teaching in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-3-1","code":"E-3-1","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E3.2 Recruitment and Selection","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETeachers teaching in affected area\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"Total # number of affected teachers","numerator":"# of affected teachers teaching","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school level (primary, secondary, tertiary), sex","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402046359","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2202","label":"Percentage of emergency affected learning spaces\/ schools in target areas incorporating psycho-social support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-01","code":"E-2-01","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools providing Psychosocial support\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning spaces ","numerator":"# of affected learning spaces\/schools incorporating psycho-social support","disaggregation":"Geography, Type of school\/learning space (sex \/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402043258","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws, MIRA, other Joint Cluster Needs Assessments (Humanitarian Caseload monitoring), EMIS","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, R4 Governance, (P) Protection, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"2203","label":"Percentage of teachers\/other educational personnel in affected areas trained in psycho-social support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-04","code":"E-2-04","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETeachers trained in psychosocial support\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"Total # of affected teachers\/other educational personnel ","numerator":"# of affected teachers\/other educational personnel trained in pycho-social support","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school level (primary, secondary, tertiary), sex","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402044074","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R4 Governance, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE Psychosocial support guidance and implementing materials\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1065 \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1104"},{"id":"2330","label":"Percentage of schools\/learning spaces used as shelters in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-05","code":"E-1-05","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator allows you to track the number of schools\/learning spaces that are being used as temporary shelters, evauation centers, and occupied by displaced populations\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of School\/Learning Spaces in  affected area","numerator":"# of schools\/learning spaces used as temporary shelters","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary) and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424859077","data_sources":" Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C2.2 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, C3.8 Access and Movement, C4.1 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2328","label":"Percentage of emergency affected children (3-5 yrs old) attending ECD Spaces in affected areas","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-02","code":"E-1-02","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator provides information on children attending ECD Space.  This indicator gives the  number of children with access to ECD.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Children","denominator":"Total # of children (3-5 yrs old) in affected areas","numerator":"# of emergency affected children (3-5 yrs old) attending ECD (Child Friendly) Spaces in affected areas (Proxy can be number of open facilities * number of children in each facility)","disaggregation":"by geographic location (ie administrative boundary), age and sex, school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), status of school facility (new, re-opened, damaged, unaffected),","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424858928","data_sources":"National Government (MOE) Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws, MIRA, other Joint Cluster Needs Assessments (Humanitarian Caseload monitoring)","general_guidance":"ECD age range may differ from country to country.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Initially based on % of population and pre-crises enrolment figures, later phases use attendance figures\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThere is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, (P) Protection, PC3 Sexual violence, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"Knowing the ration of female and male learners will help identify imbalances.  Note target will depend on pre-crisis data. Please refer to the FODs where available. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIn case there is a strong discrepancy between the percentage of girls and of boys enrolled in school, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing in equally accessing education.  Please refer to the INEE pocket guide to gender for more information.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n50% = gender equality\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u0026lt;50% = females are under-represented\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u0026lt;50% = males are under-represented\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2327","label":"Percentage of emergency affected children and youth (5-18 yrs old) attending learning spaces\/schools in affected areas.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-01","code":"E-1-01","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator provides information on children and Youth attending schooling - Gives number of children with access to education.  Note that target % will depend on pre-crises enrolment figures (refer to FODs where available)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Children","denominator":"Total # children and youth (5 - 18) in affected areas","numerator":"# of emergency affected children and youth (5-18 yrs old) attending learning spaces\/schools in affected areas (Proxy can be: # of children (5-18 years) enrolled in school within the affected area.  Or number of open facilities * average number of children at each facility)","disaggregation":"by geographic location (ie administrative boundary), age and sex, school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), status of school facility (new, re-opened, damaged, unaffected),","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424852708","data_sources":"National Government (MOE). Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws, MIRA, other Joint Cluster Needs Assessments (humanitarian caseload monitoring)","general_guidance":"Alternative formulation of the indicator could be  # of children (5-18 years) enrolled in school within the \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\naffected area. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nProxy indicator can be number of open facilities * average number of children at each facility\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nDisaggregation by primary, secondary and tertiary, note age ranges differ from country to country.  Sometimes primary is disaggregated by lower\/upper.  Also sometimes by formal and non-formal such as accelerated learning and vocational education. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n In some countries, primary and (higher) secondary education fall under different ministries, which can complicate data collection.  Some countries distringuish between primary and secondary, others use basic education, which covers 9 grades. Countries \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nshould use what makes most sense, but we should strive towards covering \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nsecondary as well.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Initially based on % of population and pre-crises enrolment figures, later phases use attendance figures  (all phases)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThere is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, (P) Protection, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"Knowing the ratio of female and male learners will help identify imbalances.  Note target will depend on pre-crisis data. Please refer to the FODs where available. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIn case there is a strong discrepancy between the percentage of girls and of boys enrolled in school, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing in equally accessing education.  Please refer to the INEE pocket guide to gender for more information.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n50% = gender equality\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u0026lt;50% = females are under-represented\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u0026lt;50% = males are under-represented\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2326","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces with DDR interventions","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-07","code":"E-2-07","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools with DDR interventions\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning spaces ","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces with DDR interventions ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402044793","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R4 Governance, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE DDR Guidance and Implmenting  Materials \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1055  \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1097\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2325","label":"Percentage of affected schools\/learning spaces with feeding programmes","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-18","code":"E-1-18","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools\/learnnig spaces with feeding programmes\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total number of affected schools\/learning spaces ","numerator":"Number of affected schools\/learning spaces with feeding programs ","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1415967573","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.5 Service Provision - Food and Nutrition, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":""},{"id":"2324","label":"Number and percentage of emergency affected children\/youth (3-18 years) accessing to emergency education programmes that incorporate nutrition interventions","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-17","code":"E-1-17","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003EChildren and Youth with access to schools with nutrition programmes\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Children","denominator":"Total # of affected children (3-18 years)","numerator":"# of affected children (3-18 years) with access to emergency education programmes that incorporate nutrition interventions ","disaggregation":"by geographic location (ie administrative boundary), age and sex, school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), status of school facility (new, re-opened, damaged, unaffected),","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1415967535","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.5 Service Provision - Food and Nutrition, F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2323","label":"Percentage of schools\/learning spaces  occupied by security forces in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-16","code":"E-1-16","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools occupied by armed groups\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of School\/ Learning Spaces in affected arrea","numerator":"# of schools\/ learning spaces occupied by security forces in affected area","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1401865050","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, (P) Protection, PC6 Child Labour","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2322","label":"Number and percentage of assessed formal and informal learning environments that are considered safe for boys and girls of different ages","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-14","code":"E-1-14","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.3 Protection and Well-being","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools\/ Learning Spaces that are safe and protective\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of learning spaces assessed in affected area","numerator":"# of affected school\/learning spaces assessed safe and protective","disaggregation":"Geography  location ( ie. administrative boundary), type of learning space (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402042380","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, (P) Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, PC6 Child Labour, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), S1.2 Assistance","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1103 \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1064"},{"id":"2321","label":"Number of education kits required in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-09","code":"E-1-09","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EEducation Kits required in affected area\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Kits","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"# of education kits required in affected area","disaggregation":"By geographic location ( ie administrative boundary),  Kit type (School kits, recreation kits, teacher kits, student kits, sanitation kits), School type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary),","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1394632397","changed":"1401980370","data_sources":"MoE, Needs Assessment ","general_guidance":"There are different typs of kits which can be defined locally and what it contains may differ. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, PG6 Prevention Programming, S2.1 Access","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2320","label":"Percentage of schools\/learning spaces provided learning materials","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-08","code":"E-1-08","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools provided with learning materials\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of affected school buildings\/learning spaces","numerator":"# of affected school buildings provided with learning materials","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary), Type of school\/learning space (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), # classrooms","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424859194","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"NA Baseline and Phase 4\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThere is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2331","label":"Number and percentage of emergency affected children (3-18 years) accessing to emergency education programmes that incorporate health interventions","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-11","code":"E-1-11","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003EChildren and Youth with access to with school health interventions\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Children","denominator":"Total # of affected children (3-18 years)","numerator":"# of affected children (3-18 years) with access to emergency education programmes that incorporate health interventions in affected areas","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary), type of school\/learning space (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), # children by age and sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1415967340","data_sources":"MoE, NA Assessment, Cluster Partner Reporting-4W","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.5 Service Provision - Food and Nutrition, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2332","label":"Percentage of learning spaces\/schools with adequate male and female WASH facilities in affected areas","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-12","code":"E-1-12","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools\/learning spaces with adequate male and female WASH facilities\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of affected schools\/ learning spaces","numerator":"# of affected schools\/learning spaces with adequate male and female WASH facilities","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary), type of school\/learning space (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), WASH facility male and female  (# of latrine doors for m\/f)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424859592","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws, Education Cluster Needs Assessment, EMIS","general_guidance":"WASH facilities are adequate water source, latrines\/toilets. See INEE for definition of \u0026quot;adequate\u0026quot; . Also refer to the INEE pocket guide on gender for a definition of \u0026quot;adequate\u0026quot; which means that there are separate latrine doors for girls and for boys, with a pictogram, and that can be locked from the inside. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nWhat are the recommendations for teachers latrines in terms of sex separation?","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Pre-Crisis Data, NA Baseline\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThere is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2204","label":"Percentage of teachers\/other educational personnel in affected areas trained in emergency life skills","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-05","code":"E-2-05","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETeachers trained in Life Skills\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"Total # of affected teachers\/other educational personnel ","numerator":"# of affected teachers\/other educational personnel trained in emergency life skills","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school level (primary, secondary, tertiary), sex","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402044196","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R4 Governance, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW), P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE Life Skills and Complementary Education Guidance: http:\/\/www.ineesite.org\/en\/resources\/life_skills_and_complementary_education\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSee Life Skills for Adolescents: http:\/\/www.ineesite.org\/en\/resources\/life_skills_for_adolescents\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2205","label":"Percentage of teachers\/other educational personnel in affected areas trained in DRR","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-06","code":"E-2-06","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETeachers trained in DRR\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"Total # of affected teachers\/other educational personnel ","numerator":"# of affected teachers\/other educational personnel trained in DRR","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school level (primary, secondary, tertiary), sex","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402044711","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R4 Governance, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE DDR Guidance and Implementing Materials http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1054\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1097"},{"id":"2207","label":"Number and percentage of surveyed active-duty education staff who have signed the adopted code of conduct","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-3-5","code":"E-3-5","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E3.3 Supervision","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETeachers working to code of practice\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Personnel","denominator":"Total # of active-duty education staff who have signed the code of conduct","numerator":"# of active-duty education staff surveyed","disaggregation":"Geography (ie. Administrative boundary), sex and job title, school level (ECD\/ primary\/ secondary\/ tertiary\/ non formal)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402046964","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG6 Prevention Programming","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2208","label":"Percentage of affected Ministry of Education Office facilities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-3-6","code":"E-3-6","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E3.3 Supervision","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAffected Ministry of Education office facilities are those slightly damaged, moderately damaged, and severely damaged. This indicator should breaks down damaged and\/or destroyed shelter by degree of damage.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Education Facilities","denominator":"Total #  of  Education Office facilities  in affected area","numerator":"#  of affected Education Office facilities in affected area","disaggregation":"Geography (ie. Administrative boundary), sex and job title, school level (ECD\/ primary\/ secondary\/ tertiary\/ non formal)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402047098","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"S1.1 Access, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2209","label":"Percentage of MoE officials at sub-national level in emergency affected areas trained in EiE","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-4-1","code":"E-4-1","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E4.1 Law and Policy Formulation","description":"\u003Cp\u003ELocal MoE officials trained in EiE\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Public sector employee","denominator":"# of MoE officials in emergency affected areas","numerator":"# of MoE officials at sub-national level in emergency affected areas trained in Education in Emergencies (EIE)","disaggregation":"Geography location ( ie. Administrative boundary), sex , Level of personnel (management, teacher)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402047347","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PG6 Prevention Programming, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2210","label":"Percentage of MoE officials at sub-national level in emergency affected areas attending training","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-4-2","code":"E-4-2","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E4.1 Law and Policy Formulation","description":"\u003Cp\u003ELocal MoE officials trained in EiE\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Public sector employee","denominator":"# of MoE officials in emergency affected areas","numerator":"# of MoE officials at sub-national level in emergency affected areas trained in Education in Emergencies (EIE)","disaggregation":"Geography ( ie administrative boundary), sex , Level of personnel (management, teacher)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402047424","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, R4 Governance, PC3 Sexual violence, PG6 Prevention Programming, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2335","label":"Percentage of emergency affected learning spaces\/ schools in target areas where children and youth receive key messages on DRR","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-03","code":"E-2-03","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools providing DRR key messages\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total # of affected learning spaces\/schools ","numerator":"# of affected learning spaces\/schools where children and youth receive key messages on  DRR in target areas","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402043526","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws, MIRA, other Joint Cluster Needs Assessments (Humanitarian Caseload monitoring), EMIS","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, R4 Governance, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE DDR Guidance and Implementing Materials http:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1054\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nhttp:\/\/toolkit.ineesite.org\/toolkit\/Toolkit.php?PostID=1097"},{"id":"2329","label":"Percentage and Number of Temporary Learning Spaces constructed in affected area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-04","code":"E-1-04","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.1 Equal Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator allows you to track and measure the output activities of constructed Temporary Learning Spaces against the target needed of temporary learning spaces\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of Temporary Learning Spaces needed ","numerator":"# of Temporary Learning Spaces constructed in affected area","disaggregation":"Geography location (ie administrative boundary), Type of school\/learning space, # classrooms, # children \u0026amp; youth (by age and sex)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1424859026","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.6 Service Provision - Education, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, PC3 Sexual violence","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"Preparedness: With government and partners, ensure that pre-crisis baseline data is collected on number and location of schools and number of teachers and students in vulnerable areas. Determine essential supplies needed for temporary learning spaces, including weather appropriate tents, tarpaulins, etc., and determine options for procurement. Identify relevant standby agreements with local suppliers and\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nconsider warehousing essential supplies as the situation warrants.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nResponse: With government and partners, determine where temporary learning spaces should be established, ensuring safety and security. Sites should have shade and protection against wind, rain, cold and dust, and be located away from stagnant water, very loud areas, main roads and distribution points. Plan sites with community as partner, preserving previous social arrangements to the extent possible. Consider alternative shelters, besides formal school buildings, such as markets, churches, mosques,temples, etc. Plan sites according to child friendly criteria, with services to include primary education, recreation,\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\npsychosocial support, early childhood care and development, youth activities, WASH facilities, and mother support. Determine essential supplies needed for temporary learning spaces, including furniture, weather appropriate tents, tarpaulins, etc., and determine options for procurement. Deploy stockpiled supplies and order additional supplies required based on previous standby agreements with suppliers to meet the demands of temporary learning spaces. Order offshore if local supplies are not available. Collaborate with child protection and WASH to ensure that temporary learning spaces have water and sanitation facilities and are designed to protect children against abuse"},{"id":"2334","label":"Percentage of emergency affected learning spaces\/ schools in affected areas where children and youth receive key messages on emergency life skills","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-2-02","code":"E-2-02","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E2.1 Curricula","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools providing Life skills\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/Learning Spaces","denominator":"Total # of affected schools\/learning spaces","numerator":"# of emergency affected learning spaces\/schools where children and youth receive key messages on emergency life skills","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary)  and school type (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary)","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1402043427","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws, MIRA, other Joint Cluster Needs Assessments (Humanitarian Caseload monitoring), EMIS","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, R4 Governance, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, PC6 Child Labour, PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM), PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW), PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"See INEE Life Skills and Complementary Education Guidance: http:\/\/www.ineesite.org\/en\/resources\/life_skills_and_complementary_education\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSee Life Skills for Adolescents: http:\/\/www.ineesite.org\/en\/resources\/life_skills_for_adolescents\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2333","label":"Percentage of learning spaces\/schools provided with adequate male and or female WASH facilities in affected areas","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/e-1-13","code":"E-1-13","global_clusters":"Education","domain":"E1.2 Facilities and services","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESchools provided adequate with male and or female WASH facilities\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Schools\/ Learning spaces","denominator":"Total # of affected schools\/learning spaces needing adequate male and or female WASH facilities","numerator":"# of affected schools\/learning spaces with adequate male and or female WASH facilities constructed\/ rehabilitated","disaggregation":"by geographic location ( ie administrative boundary), type of school\/learning space (sex\/primary, secondary, tertiary), WASH facility male and female  (# of latrine doors for m\/f)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1394632397","changed":"1416312459","data_sources":"Cluster Partner reporting - 4Ws","general_guidance":"WASH facilities are adequate water source, latrines\/toilets. See INEE for definition of \u0026quot;adequate\u0026quot; . Also refer to the INEE pocket guide on gender for a definition of \u0026quot;adequate\u0026quot; which means that there are separate latrine doors for girls and for boys, with a pictogram, and that can be locked from the inside. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nWhat are the recommendations for teachers latrines in terms of sex separation?","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, R4 Governance, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Specific to Country","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2170","label":"Percentage of humanitarian organizations and service providers that have in place codes of conduct on prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse by own staff","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg6-2","code":"P2-PG6-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG6 Prevention Programming","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"n\/a ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1416233756","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E4 Educational Policy, F1 Food Assistance, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","threshold":"Note: PSEA is not just a Protection or GBV issue. All actors in disaster relief must be aware of the risk of sexual violence including sexual exploitation and abuse by humanitarians, and must work to prevent and respond to it (Guidance Note 3: sexual violence)","comments":""},{"id":"2301","label":"Number or percentage of survivors from mine\/ERW incidents receiving support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p4-pm4-1","code":"P4-PM4-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PM4 Victim Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe rapid and effective intervention of victim assistance services to people injured by mine\/ERW would reduce the incidence of death, limb lost or permanent injury, as well as psychological consequences of the trauma\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage (mine\/ ERW survivors)","denominator":"Total number of survivors from mine\/ ERW incidents","numerator":"Number of survivors from mine\/ERW incidents receiving emergency medical care and psychological support","disaggregation":"Geography (including communities affected); Age, sex ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Mine\/ERW victims include survivors, but also the families and immediate community of those killed or injured by the explosion of mine and ERW. A system for data collection of those victimized has to be set as early as possible to ensure adequate and timely assistance is provided to victims. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2186","label":"Number of complaints\/ disputes reported in relation to the use of land for humanitarian response activities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl3-5","code":"P3-PL3-5","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL3 HLP Disputes","description":"","unit":"Number","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of complaints\/disputes reported in relation to land used for humanitarian response activities","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site; Sector of humanitarian relief; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community); ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861784","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"See above in regards to the \u0026quot;appropriateness\u0026quot; of land for humanitarian purposes, such as for camps, transitional shelter, temporary livelihoods, infrastructures, temprorary services (clinics, schools, water points, latrines, livestock pasture); etc..","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phase 1 of a new L3 emergency","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2157","label":"Number or percentage of persons trained on mine risk reduction  ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p4-pm2-1","code":"P4-PM2-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PM2 Mine and ERW risk education","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage Affected","denominator":"Total # of affected individuals","numerator":"# of affected individuals with the information needed to reduce personal risks","disaggregation":"Geography; Status (displaced, host family, etc.); sex, age ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422568","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","threshold":"IMAS ","comments":""},{"id":"2156","label":"Percentage of land cleared of land mines and\/or unexploded ordinances","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p4-pm1-1","code":"P4-PM1-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW)","description":"","unit":"Measurement to be selected at national level, i.e. m2 or hectares ","denominator":"Total land identified to be at risk of mine or UXO contamination ","numerator":"Total land identified to be at risk of mine or UXO contamination which is cleared and being used for socio-economic purposes","disaggregation":"Georaphical; Release status (land cleared and released by other means, land not cleared and released); Use of released land (land in use, land not in use); Types of land use (Accomodation, Production)","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422568","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PL2 Access to Land, PL3 HLP Disputes, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","threshold":"IMAS ","comments":""},{"id":"2155","label":"Observed or reported changes in women\u0026#039;s and\/or girls\u0026#039; mobility patterns","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg5-3","code":"P2-PG5-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing","description":"\u003Cp\u003EQualitative information would be needed to further specify the causes of change; however, the yes\/no indicator provides a first entry point for a more specific GBV assessment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/ No indicator","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F3 Food Access, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"Help minimise other threats: provide assistance in ways that make people more secure, facilitating people\u0026#039;s own efforts to stay safe or taking steps to reduce their exposure to risk (Guidance Note 10).","comments":"This is a qualitative indicator, and the changes may not be measurable. However, simply being attuned to such dynamics can lead to improved interventions across all humanitarian clusters\/sectors."},{"id":"2154","label":"% of surveyed communities indicating there is a risk of physical or sexual violence","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg5-2","code":"P2-PG5-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"total # of communities surveyed","numerator":"# of communities indicating there is a risk of physical or sexual violence","disaggregation":"n\/a ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1416233670","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"This question should only be asked at a very general level about perceived risks, not about specific incidents or individual survivors. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Help minimise other threats: provide assistance in ways that make people more secure, facilitating people\u0026#039;s own efforts to stay safe or taking steps to reduce their exposure to risk (Sphere Guidance Note 10).","comments":""},{"id":"2171","label":"Percentage of humanitarian organizations and service providers that have in place community-based feedback and complaint mechanisms","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg6-3","code":"P2-PG6-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG6 Prevention Programming","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"n\/a ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1416233786","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E4 Educational Policy, F1 Food Assistance, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","threshold":"Note: PSEA is not just a Protection or GBV issue. All actors in disaster relief must be aware of the risk of sexual violence including sexual exploitation and abuse by humanitarians, and must work to prevent and respond to it (Guidance Note 3: sexual violence)","comments":""},{"id":"2172","label":"Mechanism in place to collect, analyse and disseminate Mine\/ERW data ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p4-pm1-3","code":"P4-PM1-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW)","description":"","unit":"This indicator can be measured with yes \/ no.","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"State collects, analyzes and disseminates data related to mine and ERW\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nrelated disabilities disaggregated by age and gender","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"IMSMA is the professional and widely used information management tool for mine action. This indicator shows whether IMSMA is in place or not.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, S1 Shelter","threshold":"IMAS ","comments":""},{"id":"2300","label":"Protocols aligned with international standards have been established for the clinical management of rape","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg6-1","code":"P2-PG6-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG6 Prevention Programming","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator examines the standards and procedures in place at medical facilities with regards to treating survivors of sexual violence.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/ No indicator","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Should be tracked in conjunction with the other indicators on CMR training and supplies.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H4.3 Sexual violence, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2190","label":"Number of targeted persons provided with HLP capacity building \/ training","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl4-4","code":"P3-PL4-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups","description":"","unit":"Number","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of persons provided with HLP training","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administration; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community); Type of beneficiary (local, national, international)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"HLP capacity building \/ training could include local, national and international actors involved in the humanitarian response. Beneficiaries could be local chiefs, religious leaders, national staff or representatives of the civil society or local\/national governments. As part of the training evaluation, participants should be asked whether or not they feel better equipped to address HLP issues.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2189","label":"Number and Percentage of surveyed persons \/ communities provided with access to information  on HLP rights, referral services, and available support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl4-3","code":"P3-PL4-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total # of surveyed persons \/ communities affected by HLP issues or disputes","numerator":" # surveyed persons \/ communitities provided with HLP information","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administration; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861832","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"HLP information could be provided through public media or other appropriate channels at national and local level. HLP information could cover for example: information on available services and support to address HLP disputes and other HLP issues. HLP information should be as much as possible provided in local language(s) in different formats (written; oral; visual) depending on context and target group. HLP information can target population directly and indirectly affected by the emergency (private landlords; relevant public authorities; etc.).","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2188","label":"Number of advocacy initiatives carried out to promote HLP rights and\/or to ensure that HLP issues are addressed","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl4-2","code":"P3-PL4-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups","description":"","unit":"Number","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of advocacy initiatives to promote HLP rights and\/or to ensure HLP issues are addressed ","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Advocacy initiatives could target a broad range of key stakeholders and decision makers involved in the emergency response through for example briefing with the Humanitarian Coordinator; donor consultations; workshops with government counterparts; etc. to develop or change existing policy in regards to HLP","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2187","label":"Number of interventions to improve land use and management","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl4-1","code":"P3-PL4-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups","description":"","unit":"Number","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of interventions to improve land use and management ","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861817","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"HLP interventions to improve land use and management aim to reduce both the impact on the population of the current as well as future emergencies, notably by addressing issues related to human settlements located on hazardous or inappropriate land, as well as to the use of land for humanitarian response activities.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 3-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2185","label":"Number of HLP  dispute resolution mechanisms provided with support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl3-4","code":"P3-PL3-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL3 HLP Disputes","description":"","unit":"Number ","denominator":"","numerator":"# of HLP dispute resolution institutions provided with support","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administration; Type of displacement site; Type of HLP dispute resolution mechanism","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861769","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Support could be provided to HLP dispute resolution mechanisms in both areas directly and indirectly affected by the emergency i.e. areas where displaced populations are temporarily settled \/ hosted. Support to HLP dispute resolution mechanism include financial and material resources as well as technical advice. The type of support provided should be decided and appropriate at the local level. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2181","label":"Number and Percentage of surveyed persons \/ communities reporting lack or limited access to HLP rights","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl2-4","code":"P3-PL2-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL2 Access to Land","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage ","denominator":"Total # persons \/ communities surveyed","numerator":"# of surveyed persons \/ communities indicating access to and enjoyment of HLP Rights","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861685","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"HLP right include a range of statutory and customary rights and entitlements relating to the right to use, control, transfer and enjoy properties. HLP rights may be acquired through a variety of means depending upon jurisdiction, including sale, inheritance, gift, grant from the State, adverse possession and customary-use right (such as land clearing). HLP rights include among others the right to adequate housing, the right to use land owned and exclude other people from using the land, property rights, etc.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 3-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2184","label":"Percentage of operational HLP dispute resolution mechanisms within surveyed communities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl3-3","code":"P3-PL3-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL3 HLP Disputes","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total # of national \/ local HLP dispute resolution mechanisms within surveyed communities","numerator":"# operational HLP dispute resolution mechanisms within surveyed communities","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administration; Type of HLP dispute resolution mechanism; Type of displacement site","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"HLP dispute resolution mechanisms include the statutory justice system (ex. land or housing commissions and tribunals) as well as customary bodies (ex: local committees\/councils).","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2182","label":"Number and Percentage of surveyed persons \/ communities reporting HLP disputes","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl3-1","code":"P3-PL3-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL3 HLP Disputes","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage ","denominator":"Total # of persons \/ communities surveyed ","numerator":"# of surveyed persons \/ communities reporting HLP disputes","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP,  host community)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861746","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"HLP disputes caused or exacerbated by the emergencies could comprise (non exhaustive list): disputes over inheritance; land\/property boudaries; breach of land sale agreement or revocation; HLP disputes are context specific and should be identified at country level. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2299","label":"Percentage of cases identified in need of psychosocial\/mental health services who are referred to specialist services ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pg5-8","code":"P1-PC4-5","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of children identified as in need of specific psychosocial and mental health services","numerator":"# of children identified as in need of specific psychosocial and mental health services who are referred to focsed specialised services","disaggregation":"age, sex, geography","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1425485200","data_sources":"Case Management System CPIMS","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2180","label":"Percentage of the surveyed population settled on hazardous or inappropriate land","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl2-3","code":"P3-PL2-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL2 Access to Land","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total # of persons \/ communities surveyed ","numerator":"#  households \/ persons settled on hazardous and inappropriate land","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Household; Type of displacement site; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861668","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Refer to land which could be affected by different types of disasters associated with natural hazards (floods; earthquake; etc.) but also land areas affected by environmental degradation and vulnerabilites (include industrial pollution) and land situated in areas with high health risks (epidemics\/seasonal outbreaks). This indicator covers both displaced and non-displaced emergency affected population. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-2 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2179","label":"Number and Percentage of surveyed persons \/ communities provided with support in situation of forced eviction","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl2-2","code":"P3-PL2-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL2 Access to Land","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total # of persons \/ communities surveyed","numerator":"# persons \/ communities provided with support in situation of forced eviction","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP,  host community); Type of situation reported (risk-incident of forced eviction)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861649","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Support can be provided before, during and after a forced eviction. When a risk \/ threat of forced eviction has been communicated and before it occurs, a number of actions can be taken such as consultations with all parties involved to prevent the eviction or to identify appropriate alternatives. During an eviction, support aims at mitigating harm and suffering. After an eviction, continued support is provided to ensure access to remedies such as compensation of all material or non-material losses..","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2173","label":"Number or percentage of communities where presence of explosive remnants of war or unexploded amunitions\/devices are reported","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p4-pm1-2","code":"P4-PM1-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PM1 Clearance of Mines and other Explosive Remnants of War (ERW)","description":"","unit":"Number or Percentage","denominator":"Total population living in surveyed area","numerator":"Population living in at risk area","disaggregation":"Geography; Shelter type (Area of Origin, Camp, Temporary Shelter, Transit)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"The term \u0026quot;communities\u0026quot; should cover all sorts of concentrations of civilians (such as, for example IDP camps)","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F3 Food Access, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PL2 Access to Land, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, S1 Shelter","threshold":"IMAS ","comments":""},{"id":"2174","label":"Number and Percentage of surveyed persons reporting personalHLP documentation issues","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl1-1","code":"P3-PL1-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL1 HLP Documentation","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total # of persons \/ communities surveyed (for the percentage)","numerator":"# of persons reporting HLP documentation issues","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community); Type of document","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861444","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Personal HLP  documentation include legal and customary, invidual\/collective records, and other informal types of evidence on land and property ownership. NB: Personal HLP documentation may have been lost or damaged during the emergency, or may have never been issued in the first place. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2183","label":"Number of HLP disputes addressed ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl3-2","code":"P3-PL3-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL3 HLP Disputes","description":"","unit":"Number ","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of HLP disputes addressed","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administration; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community); Type of HLP dispute resolution mechanism","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"There are different stages \/ steps in addressing HLP disputes, such as for example recording the dispute; referring the dispute to appropriate available support; dispute being processed; and dispute is resolved (agreement reached). Some HLP disputes will be recorded but may not imply further action and could thus be considered as \u0026quot;addressed\u0026quot;","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2175","label":"Number of personal HLP documents protected, replaced or issued ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl1-2","code":"P3-PL1-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL1 HLP Documentation","description":"","unit":"Number","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of personal HLP documents protected,  replaced, issued","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administration; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex;Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community); Action conducted i.e. personal documents protected, replaced or issued","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861478","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2176","label":"Number of public HLP documents destroyed or damaged ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl1-3","code":"P3-PL1-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL1 HLP Documentation","description":"","unit":"n\/a","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# public HLP documents destroyed or damaged ","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of document","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393882959","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Public HLP documents include all civil \/ state administration records, such as for example: land and housing registers; cadastral plans; etc. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2177","label":"Number of public HLP records protected, replaced, improved, and\/or created","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl1-4","code":"P3-PL1-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL1 HLP Documentation","description":"","unit":"Number ","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"# of public HLP records protected, replaced, inmproved, and\/or created","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administration; Action conducted i.e. public records protected, replaced, improved and \/ or created","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861521","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2178","label":"Number and Percentage of surveyed persons\/communities reporting a situation of forced eviction","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p3-pl2-1","code":"P3-PL2-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PL2 Access to Land","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total # of persons \/ communities surveyed","numerator":"# of surveyed persons \/ communities reporting a situation of forced eviction","disaggregation":"Geographic; Administrative; Type of displacement site; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community); Type of situation reported (risk-incident of forced eviction)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393882959","changed":"1424861614","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Situation of forced eviction can either refer to both the oral or written communication from local authorities, private owners etc.. of a threat\/risk of being evicted as well as the incident itself of forced eviction. Forced eviction is defined as the permanent or temporary removal against their will of individuals, families and\/or communities from the homes and\/or lands which they occupy, without the provision of, and access to, appropriate forms of legal or other protection. Forced evictions can result from a broad range of situation such as for example: conflicts in which eviction, housing demolition and displacement are used as a weapon of war, for ethnic cleansing and population transfer; armed conflict characterized by targeting of civilians homes, including for collective punishment; lack of legal security of tenure, adequate protective legislation and\/or their implementation; non-deliverance or non-recognition of titles over land and housing; changes related to housing and land in countries in transition. The scope of the issue of forced eviction is context-specific and should be defined at country level.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2294","label":"% of health workers trained on Clinical Management of Rape","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-10","code":"P2-PG3-10","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG6 Prevention Programming","description":"\u003Cp\u003EClinical Management of Rape (CMR) is an internationally recognized standard of care for survivors of sexual violence.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"total # of health workers (in the categories selected at the national level, e.g. medical officers, nurses, etc.)","numerator":"# health staff trained on Clinical Management of Rape","disaggregation":"Health Administrative Area; Sex: Level of health workers (medical doctor, nurse, midwife)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"To be used in conjunction with the Health Cluster\u0026#039;s H-A.6 indicator: \u0026quot;Percentage of functional health facilities with Clinical Management of Rape survivor services\u0026quot;. In order for survivors to receive the care they need, in addition to available CMR supplies, there must also be sufficient numbers of staff trained on CMR. Denominator should be limited to doctors, nurses, etc. (not medical admin staff).","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H4.3 Sexual violence, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Measures for assisting survivors must be in place for all primary-level health facilities and include skilled staff to provide clinical management that encompasses emergency contraception, post-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV, presumptive treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), wound care, tetanus prevention and hepatitis B prevention...\u0026quot; (Guidance Note 3: sexual violence)","comments":""},{"id":"2292","label":"Written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for GBV prevention and response developed and agreed upon by all relevant humanitarian actors ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg2-1","code":"P2-PG2-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG2 Develop\/apply SOPs context specific","description":"","unit":"Yes\/No indicator","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2356","label":" SoPs for family reunification established or reflected in generic SoPs","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc7-5","code":"P1-PC7-5","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","description":"","unit":"n\/a","denominator":"# of child protection actors ","numerator":"# of child protection actors who have an understanding of SoPs for family reunification (Y\/N)","disaggregation":"","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422568","data_sources":"Systematic Review","general_guidance":"Yes\/no indicator ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2293","label":"Percentage of health facilities where Clinical Management of Rape + Emergency Contraceptive Pills + Post-exposure prophylaxsis for HIV available","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-4","code":"P2-PG3-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"total # of health facilities","numerator":"# health facilities with CMR + ECP + PEP available","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"This indicator should be used in conjunction with the indicator about CMR training.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H4.3 Sexual violence, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"People have access to the priority reproductive health services of the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) at the onset of an emergency and comprehensive reproductive health as the situation stabilises (Need to fill in quantities of each drug per 10,000 populaiton)","comments":""},{"id":"2144","label":"Functional referral system in place that includes multi-sectoral services (health, psychosocial, legal and security) for GBV survivors","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg1-1","code":"P2-PG1-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors","description":"\u003Cp\u003Eyes\/no indicator\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No indicator","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Geography, Types of services","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H4.3 Sexual violence, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2169","label":"Percentage of registered unaccompanied\/separated children in appropriate interim care","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc7-4","code":"P1-PC7-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of registered unaccompanied and separated children","numerator":"# of registered unaccompanied and separated children in appropriate interim care","disaggregation":"Geography, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393881759","changed":"1416233935","data_sources":"Case Management System CPIMS","general_guidance":"The appropriate care should be defined in the country context, but need to be related to the  CP minimum Standard 15: \u0026quot;Case management\u0026quot;","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, S1 Shelter","threshold":"0.9","comments":""},{"id":"2302","label":"Percentage of facilities surveyed who indicate increased numbers of children detained since  [DATE-EMERGENCY-ETC]","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc8-1","code":"P1-PC8-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC8 Justice for Children","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator needs to be collected at the facility level (i.e. detention centres etc.); The date to be used for this baseline indicator needs to be determined in country - it could be the start of the emergency or an interagency agreed date in a protratcted crisis, eg the previous three months\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of surveyed communities ","numerator":"# of surveyed communities who indicate increased numbers of children detained ","disaggregation":"Geography, sex, age","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA)","general_guidance":"A CPRA is recommended for collecting this indicator before and after the response which will define the start of the emergency ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, R4 Governance","threshold":"To be determined in the country","comments":""},{"id":"2303","label":"Percentage of communities surveyed who confirm that Community based Child Protection Mechanisms (CBCPMs) exist in their community ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc9-1","code":"P1-PC9-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC9 Community-based child protection mechanisms (CBCPM)","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of community members surveyed  ","numerator":"# of communities members surveyed who confirm that CBCPMs exist in their community","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1416233495","data_sources":"Survey","general_guidance":"The data for this indicator should be extracted from a monitoring system","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 7-14","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, S1 Shelter","threshold":"0.8","comments":""},{"id":"2153","label":"Number of reported incidents of sexual violence per 10,000 population ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg5-1","code":"P2-PG5-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing","description":"\u003Cp\u003EData can be aggregated at different levels, country, regional, district etc. GBV specialistis in country to determine what is safe and appropriate, based on the context.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"incidents per 10,000 population","denominator":"total population \/ 10,000 in the area of analysis","numerator":"# of reported incidents of Sexual Violence in the area of analysis","disaggregation":"SADD","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1416233700","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Great caution must be exercised when interpreting increases\/decreases in reported incidents of GBV, as such fluctuations in reports do not necessarily reflect the same changes in overall incidence\/prevalence. In general, this indicator is most useful when it serves as denominator for other indicators (i.e. P2-PG3-2 and P2-PG3-3), as opposed to tracking it in isoloation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H4.3 Sexual violence, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Incidence of sexual violence should be monitored","comments":""},{"id":"2152","label":"Number of service providers providing psychosocial services to survivors of GBV","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-9","code":"P2-PG3-9","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"geography","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2151","label":"Number of service providers providing legal services to survivors of GBV","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-8","code":"P2-PG3-8","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"geography","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2150","label":"Number of persons convicted for GBV related crimes","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-7","code":"P2-PG3-7","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of pepole convinceted for GBV related crimes","disaggregation":"SADD","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2149","label":"Number of persons prosecuted for GBV related crimes","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-6","code":"P2-PG3-6","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"# of people prosecuted for GBV related crimes","disaggregation":"SADD","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1494583327","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2148","label":"Number of community-based mechanisms\/groups working on GBV prevention and response ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-5","code":"P2-PG3-5","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"# of community-based mechanisms working on GBV prevention and response","disaggregation":"","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2147","label":"Percentage of reported rape cases where survivor receives emergency contraceptive pills (ECP) within 120 hours of incident","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-3","code":"P2-PG3-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"\u003Cp\u003EEmergency contraception must be administered within 120 hours of the incident in order to be effective.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage of female rape survivors","denominator":"Total # of reported incidents of rape perpetrated against females ","numerator":"# female survivors of rape who receive ECP within 120 hours of incident","disaggregation":"Geography; SADD; Disability","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Tracking this indicator requires that the user also track Indicator P2-PG5-1 (reported incidents of sexual violence). However, it is important to note that rape -- defined as \u0026quot;non-consensual penetration (however slight) of the vagina, anus or mouth with a penis or other body part. Also includes penetration of the vagina or anus with an object.\u0026quot; (GBVIMS definition) --  is a sub-set of the broader category \u0026quot;sexual violence\u0026quot;. Care administered should be survivor-centred, respecting the principles of safety, confidentiality and informed consent. Data on GBV incidents\/treatment should never be stored with any identifying information about the survivor. For more detailed analysis, the user can calculate this indicator with a slightly different denominator -- \u0026quot;Total # of rape incidents reported within 120 hours\u0026quot;. These two options reflect that delays in administering life-saving services can occur before or after a survivor seeks care (for example, are delays occurring because the hospital is far away or because supplies are unavailable?)","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H4.3 Sexual violence, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":"Two options for denominator in order to reflect that delays in administering life-saving services can occur before or after a survivor seeks care (i.e. is the delay because the hospital is far away or because supplies are unavailable?)"},{"id":"2146","label":"Percentage of reported rape cases where survivor receives post-exposure prophylaxsis for HIV (PEP) within 72 hours of incident","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-2","code":"P2-PG3-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPEP must be administered within 72 hours of exposure in order to effectively prevent HIV transmission.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total # of reported incidents of rape","numerator":"# survivors of rape who receive PEP within 72 hours of incident","disaggregation":"Geography; SADD; Disability","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Tracking this indicator requires that the user also track Indicator P2-PG5-1 (reported incidents of sexual violence). However, it is important to note that rape -- defined as \u0026quot;non-consensual penetration (however slight) of the vagina, anus or mouth with a penis or other body part. Also includes penetration of the vagina or anus with an object.\u0026quot; (GBVIMS definition) --  is a sub-set of the broader category \u0026quot;sexual violence\u0026quot;. Care administered should be survivor-centred, respecting the principles of safety, confidentiality and informed consent. Data on GBV incidents\/treatment should never be stored with any identifying information about the survivor. For more detailed analysis, the user can calculate this indicator with a slightly different denominator -- \u0026quot;Total # of rape incidents reported within 72 hours\u0026quot;. These two options reflect that delays in administering life-saving services can occur before or after a survivor seeks care (for example, are delays occurring because the hospital is far away or because supplies are unavailable?)","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H4.3 Sexual violence, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":"Two options for denominator in order to reflect that delays in administering life-saving services can occur before or after a survivor seeks care (i.e. is the delay because the hospital is far away or because supplies are unavailable?)"},{"id":"2145","label":"Proportion of community-based workers trained in psychosocial support for GBV survivors","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p2-pg3-1","code":"P2-PG3-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial)","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"total # community workers","numerator":"# community- based workers trained in GBV psychosocial support","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393881759","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"Survivors of sexual violence should be supported to seek and be referred for clinical care and have access to mental health and psychosocial support\u0026quot; (Guidance Note 3: sexual violence)","comments":"[REMOVED COMMENTS HERE]"},{"id":"2295","label":"Percentage of communities reporting the incidence of reported cases of trafficking for exploitation (labour or sex)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-8","code":"P5-8","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"SADD","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"this excludes trafficking of babies, organs etc. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2351","label":"Percentage of community members surveyed who know how to support children with psychosocial distress","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc4-3","code":"P1-PC4-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders","description":"\u003Cp\u003Eknow means that they can name at least one response activity appropriate for children; the indicator needs to make use of the MHPSS intervention pyramid and will be assessed through a Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Survey\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of surveyed communities","numerator":"# of community members surveyed who can demonstrate knowledge of how to support children with psychosocial distress","disaggregation":"geography","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418283919","data_sources":"Survey","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E2 Teaching and Learning, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","threshold":"0.8","comments":""},{"id":"2291","label":"Percentage of registered unaccompanied and\/or separated children who are reunited with their caregivers OR in appropriate long term alternative care","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc7-2","code":"P1-PC7-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","description":"\u003Cp\u003EBoth options need to be assessed, i.e. long term care or caregivers; both options are sufficient\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of registered UASC ","numerator":"# of registered Unaccompanied and Separated Children (UASC) who are reunited with their caregivers OR in appropriate long term alternative","disaggregation":"Geography, sex, age","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"Case Management System","general_guidance":"Note that this relates to CP minimum Standard 15: \u0026quot;Case management\u0026quot;","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access","threshold":"0.9","comments":""},{"id":"2143","label":"Percentage of care plans for individual children developed within two weeks of the opening of the child\u0026#039;s care plan","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc1-1","code":"P1-PC1-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC11 Case Management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis includes case management for cases of physical violence and other harmful practices(MS 8), psychosocial distress and mental disorders (MS 10), sexual violence (MS 9), children formerly associated with armed forces or armed groups (MS 11), worst forms of child labour (MS 12), separation and unaccompaniment (MS 13), justice for children (MS 14)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of care plans for individual children developed","numerator":"# of care plans developed within two weeks of the assessment of the assessment of the child\u0026#039;s situation","disaggregation":"Sex, age and type of case ","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1425553585","data_sources":"Interagency Child Protection Information Management System (CPIMS)","general_guidance":"Note that this relates to CP minimum Standard 15: \u0026quot;Case management\u0026quot; \u0026#039;Strategies\u0026#039; will need to be defined in each context, the IACPIMS is recommended ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"0.9","comments":""},{"id":"2165","label":"Percentage of surveyed communities who indictate the involvement of children in worst forms of child labour","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc6-1","code":"P1-PC6-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC6 Child Labour","description":"\u003Cp\u003EWorst form of child labour is a term defined in the ILO convention no. 182. It must be prohibited for all people under the age of 18 yrs and includes the following: (i) all forms of slavery and practices similar to slavery; (ii) using, offering, procuring a child for prostitution, production of pornographie or for pornographic performance; (iii) using, procuring, offering a child for illicit activities; (iv) hazardous work\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of surveyed communities","numerator":"# of surveyed communities who have reported involvement of children in worst forms of child labour","disaggregation":"Age \/ Sex; In phase 4 disaggregate by type of labour","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418284144","data_sources":"Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA)","general_guidance":"A CPRA is recommended for collecting this indicator before and after the response","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2355","label":"Percentage of community members surveyed  who can describe at least one action to prevent child recruitment and one action to report on child recruitment","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc5-3","code":"P1-PC5-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups","description":"\u003Cp\u003EBoth elements, i.e. reporting and prevention need to be assessed to have an idea of the communities capacity\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of community members surveyed  ","numerator":"# of communities members surveyed who can describe commonly agreed strategies to prevent and report child recruitment","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418284092","data_sources":"Survey","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F4 Income Access, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"To be determined in country and context","comments":""},{"id":"2168","label":"Percentage of children registered for tracing that have been reunified and stayed with their family for more than six months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc7-3","code":"P1-PC7-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator captures the monitoring of cases which has to be done every three months as follow up action; see Minimum CP standards\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of children registered for family tracing","numerator":"# of children registered for tracing that has been reunified and stayed with their family for more than six months","disaggregation":"Geography, sex, age","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1416233921","data_sources":"Case Management System CPIMS","general_guidance":"Note that this relates to CP minimum Standard 15: \u0026quot;Case management\u0026quot;","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, S1 Shelter","threshold":"0.9","comments":""},{"id":"2347","label":"Percentage of health facilities providing access to preventing mother to child transmission services (PMTCT)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-6","code":"P5-6","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"yes\/no","disaggregation":"geographic unit ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, E4 Educational Policy, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.1 STI \u0026amp; HIV, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2348","label":"Durable solutions strategy developed and agreed among all relevant stakeholders","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p6-3","code":"P6-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P6 Displacement and Return","description":"\u003Cp\u003Eyes\/no; indicator to track the SG\u0026#039;s decision on durable solutions where the protection cluster is responsible with UNDP to ensure that such a strategy exist\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"yes\/no","disaggregation":"geographic unit ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, F2 Livelihood Assistance, (P) Protection, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2353","label":"Percentage of surveyed communities who note the recruitment of children into armed forces and\/or groups","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc5-1","code":"P1-PC5-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of surveyed sites indicating the recruitment of children","numerator":"# of surveyed communities who reported recruitment of children in their community ","disaggregation":"% of reporting surveyed sites indicating recruitment of children","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418284009","data_sources":"Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA)","general_guidance":"A CPRA is recommended for collecting this indicator before and after the response","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F4 Income Access, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2352","label":"Percentage of Child Friendly Spaces where structured age appropriate  CFS activities are implemented based on needs identified by girls, boys and families","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc4-4","code":"P1-PC4-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated # of affected children ","numerator":"Estimated # of children with safe access to child friendly spaces for socialising, play, learning , etc ","disaggregation":"Geography; sex","key":"No","types":"Outcome, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418283980","data_sources":"Monitoring","general_guidance":"Note that this relates to CP minimum standard 17: \u0026quot;Child friendly spaces\u0026quot;","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2349","label":"Durable solutions strategy implemented and monitored","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p6-4","code":"P6-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P6 Displacement and Return","description":"\u003Cp\u003Eyes\/no; indicator to track the SG\u0026#039;s decision on durable solutions where the protection cluster is responsible with UNDP to ensure that such a strategy exist\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"yes\/no","disaggregation":"geographic unit ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, F2 Livelihood Assistance, (P) Protection, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2296","label":"Percentage of communities reporting the incidence of cases of abuse, violence or exploitation in need of assistance receiving support ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-9","code":"P5-9","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"SADD\/type of assistance ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"a minimum requirement is that assistance is provided by same sex as appropriate and children are assisted by specialized partners","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2297","label":"Percentage\/number of reported incidence of intentional physical violence and other harmful practices [broken down by victim]","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-10","code":"P5-10","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"SADD","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2298","label":"Percentage of survivors of intentional physical violence and other harmful practices  who are referred for support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-11","code":"P5-11","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"SADD","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Need to be disaggregated by age\/gender; support is any service provision as defined by the country within the referral mechanims, i.e. legal, medical, psychosocial etc. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2275","label":"Percentage of persons with disabilities identified in need of assistance who are receiving specific support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-4","code":"P5-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"\u003Cp\u003Edisabitilites includes mental and physical disabilities\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/geographic unit; type of support","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"\u0026quot;Persons with disabilities\u0026quot; include those who have long-term or temporary physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which, in interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E4 Educational Policy, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2276","label":"Percentage of persons identified in need of assistance receiving psychosocial support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-5","code":"P5-5","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPsychosocial support includes: counselling, therapy etc. by trained personnel\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E4 Educational Policy, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H4.3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2290","label":"Percentage of surveyed communities who indicate children exhibit behavioural changes that relate to symptoms of distress since [DATE-EMERGENCY-ETC]","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc4-2","code":"P1-PC4-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe date to be used for this baseline indicator needs to be determined in country - it could be the start of the emergency or an interagency agreed date in a protratcted crisis, eg the previous three months\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of surveyed communities","numerator":"# of surveyed communities who indicate that children exhibit behavioural changes that relate to signs and symptoms of distress ","disaggregation":"Geography and, where appropriate, other distinguishing characteristics of communities","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418283887","data_sources":"Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA)","general_guidance":"A CPRA is recommended for collecting this indicator before and after the response, during which the start of the emergency will be defined ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E2 Teaching and Learning, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2289","label":"Percentage of surveyed communities that indicate a change in the incidence of sexual violence against children since [DATE-EMERGENCY-ETC]","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc3-1","code":"P1-PC3-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC3 Sexual violence","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe date to be used for this baseline indicator needs to be determined in country - it could be the start of the emergency or an interagency agreed date in a protratcted crisis, eg the previous three months\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of surveyed communities","numerator":"# of surveyed communities that indicate a change in the incidence of sexual violence against children ","disaggregation":"Geography and where appropriate, other distinguishing characteristics of the communities ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418283756","data_sources":"Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA)","general_guidance":"A CPRA is recommended for collecting this indicator before and after the response, during which the start of the emergency will be defined","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"E1 Access and Learning Environment, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2288","label":"Child Protection actors have done an analysis of how sexual violence towards boys and girls is viewed and responded to ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc2-2","code":"P1-PC3-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC3 Sexual violence","description":"\u003Cp\u003Eyes\/no indicator; need to include both elements of the context analysis (viewed and responded to) to be counted as \u0026quot;yes\u0026quot;\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"n\/a","denominator":"# of child protection actors ","numerator":"# of child protection actors who have an understanding of how sexual violence (towards boys and girls) is viewed by families and communities before programming (Y\/N)","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1425485524","data_sources":"Systematic Review","general_guidance":"This indicator is measured based on whether or not proper contextual analysis has been conducted by child protection actors in country and inter-agency strategies programming reflects this","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"E1 Access and Learning Environment, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Yes","comments":""},{"id":"2287","label":"Percentage of surveyed community members who are able to articulate strategies to prevent physical violence and other harmful practices ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc2-3","code":"P1-PC2-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"# community members surveyed","numerator":"# community members surveyed who can articulate knowledge  of ways to prevent physical violence and other harmful practices ","disaggregation":"Sex of respondents, type of strategies articulated, type of intervention implemented during \u0026#039;x\u0026#039;(tdb) months prior to the survey","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418283636","data_sources":"Survey","general_guidance":"Note that this relates to CP Minimum Standard 15: \u0026quot;Case management\u0026quot;; the minimum requirements for a strategy need to be defined in the country context, e.g. Child Protection Strategy, Protection Cluster Strategy, etc. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, E2 Teaching and Learning, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, E4 Educational Policy, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2286","label":"Percentage of identified excluded children who are accessing protection services ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc2-1","code":"P1-PC2-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC10 Excluded Children","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of excluded children identified ","numerator":"# of excluded children identified who have access to protection service","disaggregation":"Geography, age, sex","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1425553646","data_sources":"Case Management System CPIMS\/Systematic Review","general_guidance":"\u0026quot;Excluded child\u0026quot; needs to be defined in the context; \u0026quot;Protection services\u0026quot; needs to be defined in the context.","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 7 to 14","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"0.8","comments":""},{"id":"2285","label":"Percentage of targeted communities with a functioning referral system for children at the community level","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc1-2","code":"P1-PC1-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC11 Case Management","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of targeted communities","numerator":"# of targeted communities with a functioning referral system","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1425553616","data_sources":"Systematic Review","general_guidance":"Functioning should be defined in the context; referral system for children includes at least the following services:","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 7 to 14","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"To be determined in the country","comments":""},{"id":"2284","label":"% of affected population lacking personal identity\/civil documents","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p7-1","code":"P7-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P7 Documentation","description":"\u003Cp\u003Epersonal\/civil documentations includes birth registration, marriage certificate, land ownership documents etc.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"geographic unit\/ age\/sex, type of documentation ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"figures must be derived from survey or registration data ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2283","label":"Number of [or percentage of] IDPs\/affected population\/returnees registered","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p6-2","code":"P6-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P6 Displacement and Return","description":"\u003Cp\u003EDepending on the country context the indicator will trace number of total IDPs or the number of the \u0026quot;affected population\u0026quot; or returnees\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Definition for targeted\/affected population etc. should be taken from the IASC Guidance on Humanitarian Profile ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2282","label":"Percentage of  communities reporting arbitrary restrictions on freedom of movement","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p6-1","code":"P6-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P6 Displacement and Return","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"camp\/non-camp communities","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"arbitrary restrictions for this purpose are those not provided for by law and those not necessary to protect security, public order, public health or morals and the rights of freedom of movement of others; must be based on credible reports ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2354","label":"Percentage of registered children separated from armed forces or groups, who are effectively reintegrated in their families or alternatively integrated","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc5-2","code":"P1-PC5-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups","description":"","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of registered girls and boys separated from armed forces or groups ","numerator":"# of registered   girls and boys separated from armed forces or groups who are effectively reintegrated in their families and the community or alternatively integrated","disaggregation":"Geography, sex, age","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418284039","data_sources":"Case Management System CPIMS","general_guidance":"Note that this relates to CP Minimum Standard 15: \u0026quot;Case management\u0026quot;. \u0026#039;Effective Reintegration\u0026#039; needs to be defined in the country. \u0026#039;Registered\u0026#039; refers to children registered in a case management system.","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from Mimimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E1 Access and Learning Environment, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F4 Income Access, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"1","comments":""},{"id":"2167","label":"Percentage of children separated from their caregivers","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc7-1","code":"P1-PC7-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC7 Unaccompanied and separated children","description":"","unit":"n\/a","denominator":"# of surveyed communities ","numerator":"# of surveyed communities that indicate incidence of children separated from their caregivers","disaggregation":"Disaggregate SC, UAC, and orphans by sex in Phase 4","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA)","general_guidance":"A CPRA is recommended for collecting this indicator before and after the response","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E2 Teaching and Learning, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, S1.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2166","label":"Percentage of surveyed community members are aware of the danger and consequences of the Worst Forms of Child Labour","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p1-pc6-2","code":"P1-PC6-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC6 Child Labour","description":"\u003Cp\u003EWorst form of child labour is a term defined in the ILO convention no. 182. It must be prohibited for all people under the age of 18 yrs and includes the following: (i) all forms of slavery and practices similar to slavery; (ii) using, offering, procuring a child for prostitution, production of pornographie or for pornographic performance; (iii) using, procuring, offering a child for illicit activities; (iv) hazardous work; Depending on the country context this indicator should specify which forms of child labour are meant to be assessed and the knowledge thereof by the community\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"#  of surveyed communities","numerator":"#  of communities that are aware of the danger and consequences of the Worst Forms of Child Labour","disaggregation":"Geography, role of community member interviewed","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1418284165","data_sources":"Survey","general_guidance":"This indicator is linked to information campaigns and awareness raising efforts.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E2 Teaching and Learning, F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"0.8","comments":""},{"id":"2278","label":"Number of civil\/individual documents issued\/supported to be issued","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p7-2","code":"P7-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P7 Documentation","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"type of documents being issued","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2277","label":"Percentage of communities providing access to voluntary counselling and testing services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-7","code":"P5-7","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"yes\/no","disaggregation":"geographic unit ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E4 Educational Policy, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.1 STI \u0026amp; HIV, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2350","label":"Percentage of communities [or camps] that have functioning safe spaces for children [and\/or youth] ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/node\/2350","code":"P1-PC4-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"# of communities or camps that were identified as in need of safe spaces for children and\/or youth","numerator":"# of communities or camps that have safe spaces for children and\/or youth","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393881754","changed":"1460119552","data_sources":"CP monitoring","general_guidance":"Note that this relates to CP Minimum Standard 17: \u0026quot;Child friendly spaces\u0026quot;; \u0026quot;Functioning\u0026quot; should be defined as per the context.","guidance_baseline":"When responding to this need, consider including indicators from CP Minimum Standards 16 and 18","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E1 Access and Learning Environment, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, R4 Governance","threshold":"1","comments":""},{"id":"2274","label":"Percentage of older people in need of assistance who are receiving specific support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-3","code":"P5-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"\u003Cp\u003Edefinition of older people depends on context\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"sex\/age\/geographic unit","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393881389","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, E1 Access and Learning Environment, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2163","label":"Percentage of communities reporting living in hazardous areas ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-13","code":"P-13","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"\u003Cp\u003EHazardous areas are those which are prone to flooding, earthquake, fires etc\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"geographic unit ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881389","changed":"1416233992","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, P6 Displacement and Return, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, S1 Shelter, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2268","label":"Estimated percentage of affected population in need of mental health and\/or psychosocial support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-12","code":"P-12","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881389","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"IASC guidelines: \u0026quot;The composite term Mental Health and Psychosocial Support is used to describe any type of local or outside support that aims to protect or promote psychosocial well-being and\/or prevent or treat mental disorders.\u0026quot;","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H4.3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2269","label":"Percentage of communities that indicate deliberate exclusion from services for a specific group (i.e. children, disabled, minority groups)  ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-15","code":"P-15","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"geographic unit ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881389","changed":"1416234002","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, F3 Food Access, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2164","label":"Percentage of communities reporting hazardous items in their area that can result in death or injury ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-14","code":"P-14","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"\u003Cp\u003EHazardous items are debris\/rubbel; for more specific indicators on mines\/landmines\/UxOs see the Mine action indicators\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"# of surveyed communities","numerator":"# of communities who have reported existence of dangerous\/hazardeous areas\/items in their area that can result in death or injury ","disaggregation":"Geography","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881389","changed":"1398422556","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, P6 Displacement and Return, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, S1 Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2273","label":"Percentage of child headed households","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-2","code":"P5-2 ","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"geographic unit ; sex and age ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881389","changed":"1398423687","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H2 Child health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2272","label":"Percentage of female-headed households","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p5-1","code":"P5-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"P5 Vulnerability","description":"\u003Cp\u003EFemale heads of household can be especially vulnerable to certain types of GBV, such as sexual exploitation and abuse.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage female headed","denominator":"total # of households","numerator":"# female-headed households","disaggregation":"Geographic unit ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393881389","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, F3 Food Access, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery, S1.1 Access, S2.1 Access, S3.1 Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2141","label":"Number of civilians reported killed by violence","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-1","code":"P-1","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Age, sex, geographic unit, ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PM4 Victim Assistance, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2142","label":"Percentage of communities reporting survivors of trafficking for exploitation (labour or sex) receiving assistance ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-9","code":"P-9","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/support activity","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"If protection monitoring is able to be done at the individual level and not just at the community level, this indicator should be adjusted to measure the number of individuals.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, P5 Vulnerability, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2344","label":"Percentage of communities reporting persons being arbitrarily detained","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-4","code":"P-4","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/geographic unit\/perpetrator ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Detention must be based on grounds and procedures established by law; information of the reasons must be given and court control of the detention must be available as well compensation in case of breach; detention that does not meet these criteria is arbitrary .\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIf protection monitoring is able to be done at the individual level and not just at the community level, this indicator should be adjusted to measure the number of individuals.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2345","label":"Percentage of communities reporting persons being forcibly recruited into armed group\/forces ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-6","code":"P-6","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/geographic unit\/perpetrator ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Any recruitment of children is to be considered forced recruitment \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIf protection monitoring is able to be done at the individual level and not just at the community level, this indicator should be adjusted to measure the number of individuals.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PC5 Children associated with armed forces and armed groups, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2346","label":"Percentage of communities to which international and\/or national humanitarian organizations\u0026#039; access to populations has been limited by duty bearers or armed actors ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-10","code":"P-10","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"geographic unit\/perpetrator\/type of settlement\/cause ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.8 Access and Movement, E1 Access and Learning Environment, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2270","label":"Percentage of persons being arbitrarily detained who are receiving legal assistance\/advice ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-5","code":"P-5","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, PC8 Justice for Children, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2281","label":"Percentage of communities reporting cases of  survivors of organized violence, torture, inhuman and\/or degrading treatment receiving assistance ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-8","code":"P-8","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAssistance could be psychosocial support, legal assistance, material assistance\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/ type of support activity","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"If protection monitoring is able to be done at the individual level and not just at the community level, this indicator should be adjusted to measure the number of individuals.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2267","label":"Percentage of persons in need of legal assistance receiving legal assistance\/advice","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-11","code":"P-11","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/geographic unit, title\/function ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P5 Vulnerability, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2280","label":"Percentage of communities reporting cases of organized violence, torture, or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-7","code":"P-7","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIt should be discussed at the coutry level whether and how appropriate it is to report on torture etc.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/diversity group\/geographic unit\/perpetrator","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1494854602","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"If protection monitoring is able to be done at the individual level and not just at the community level, this indicator should be adjusted to measure the number of individuals.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2279","label":"Percentage [or number of]  community assets (bridge, school, hospital, place of worship etc.) being attacked","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-2","code":"P-2","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis can be an absolute figure instead of a percentage if the total number of assets is not available\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Type of asset","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1494854633","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"The COD\/FODs should provide the basis on how to establish this indicator as community assets are being mapped before the crisis ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PM4 Victim Assistance, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2271","label":"Number of persons reported disappeared\/abducted \/ missing [broken down by geographical area]","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/p-3","code":"P-3","global_clusters":"Protection","domain":"(P) Protection","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"age\/sex\/diversity group\/geographic unit\/perpetrator","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393880923","changed":"1398422540","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P5 Vulnerability, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2123","label":"Percentage of shelter interventions taking into account impact on the environment","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-10","code":"S1-2-10","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"Shelter cluster or relevant shelter sector coordination mechanism should define context-specific and measurable indicators with related guidance for assessing the impact of shelter solutions on the environment. Consider unsustainable resource use, encroachment in sensitive areas, use of environmentally friendly construction techniques, and land degradation issues  (loss of forest, mangrove, or wetland) \n","unit":"Percentage\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"Total number of shelter interventions\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of shelter interventions taking into account impact on the environment \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter intervention; Type of shelter responder (local, national, or international; governmental or non-governmental; faith-based or secular; etc.) \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393604240","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2139","label":"Average cost of shelter-related non-food items","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s2-1-3","code":"S2-1-3","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S2.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe average cost of essential shelter-related NFI should be tracked over time as a key indicator of availability and accessibility of such items ; as well as the impact on the market of in kind humanitarian aid on such items\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"","numerator":"Costs of essential NFI materials","disaggregation":"Pre \/ Post emergency prices (including evolution over time from emergency onset); types of material","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2140","label":"Average cost of shelter-related energy \/ fuel","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s3-1-3","code":"S3-1-3","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S3.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe average cost of essential shelter-related energy\/fuel (e.g. wood, gas, charcoal) should be tracked over time as a key indicator of availability and accessibility of such items ; as well as the impact on the market of in kind humanitarian aid on such items\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"","numerator":"Costs of essential energy materials","disaggregation":"Pre \/ Post emergency prices (including evolution over time from emergency onset); types of material","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, F7 Utilization","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2112","label":"Percentage of shelter interventions incorporating hazard mitigation measures","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-6","code":"S1-2-6","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator aims to evaluate how a disaster risk reduction (DRR) is applied in  the shelter response with the aim strengthen the resilience of affected households, specifically in contexts where disasters associated with natural and climate-related hazards are recurrent. Appropriate hazard mitigation measures should be defined\/identified at country level.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of shelter interventions","numerator":"Number of shelter  interventions","disaggregation":"Type of shelter interventions (self-recovery or external support); Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of response provider (local, national, or international; governmental or non-governmental; faith-based or secular; etc.) ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R3 Capacity Building","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2111","label":"Number and percentage of households having recovered adequate shelter without external support ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-5","code":"S1-2-5","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator measures the degree of self-recovery among the affected household in terms of their shelter situation. For this indicator, shelter actors should define and agree at country level on what is an adequate shelter in this specific context\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total numer of of surveyed households ","numerator":"Number of households having recovered adequate shelter without external support ","disaggregation":"Shelter damage category; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2110","label":"Percentage of beneficiary households using shelter assistance as a means to address other needs ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-3","code":"S1-2-3","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator evaluates the appropriateness of the type of assistance provided. Beneficiaries of shelter assistance may have used the assistance they receive(d) for a different purpose than originally intended. For instance, beneficiaries may sell or exchange shelter materials in order to address other humanitarian needs such as food, water or health.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of households receiving shelter assistance ","numerator":"Number of beneficiary households using shelter assistance as a means to address other needs ","disaggregation":"Type and source of  shelter support received; Shelter damage category; Sex and age ; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter responder (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)  ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2339","label":"Number and percentage of households having received shelter assistance","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-1","code":"S1-2-1","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator aims to gather disaggregated data on number households supported with shelter assistance grounded in relevant sector standards\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"Total number of affected households","numerator":"Number of households having received shelter assistance","disaggregation":"Type of  shelter assistance received (cash; material; labour; transportation; other); Shelter damage category; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of response provider (local, national, or international; governmental or NGO; faith-based or secular; etc.) ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393599911","changed":"1416314405","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, (R) Early Recovery, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2109","label":"Number and percentage of households indicating shelter as a priority need","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-1-2","code":"S1-1-2","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicators collects information on the priority support requested by affected households in order to meet their shelter-related needs. Shelter needs should be disaggregated to capture various solutions\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"Total number of surveyed households","numerator":"Number of households indicating shelter as a priority need","disaggregation":"Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1415968278","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"E1.1 Equal Access, PL1 HLP Documentation, PL2 Access to Land, PL3 HLP Disputes, P5 Vulnerability, R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":"For STANDARDS: \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSee also: Sphere: Shelter and settlement standard 1: Strategic planning, key indicator 1: Shelter and settlement solutions to meet the essential needs of all the disasteraffected\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\npopulation are agreed with the population themselves and relevant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nauthorities in coordination with all responding agencies (see guidance note 1)."},{"id":"2338","label":"Number and percentage of households receiving non-food items","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s2-2-1","code":"S2-2-1","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator aims to gather disaggregated data on number households supported with NFIs. Overall number of NFIs delivered should also be collected\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of affected households","numerator":"Number of households having received  non-food items","disaggregation":"Type and source of  non-food item received; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family) ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393599911","changed":"1416314622","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, F1 Food Assistance, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, W1.1 Hygiene items, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2337","label":" Average covered living area per person among population receiving shelter assistance","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-2","code":"S1-2-2","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe indicator captures the population density within the provided shelter solutions. Note that Sphere standards are of 3.5 m2 per person\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number ","denominator":"","numerator":" Average covered living area per person ","disaggregation":"Shelter damage category;Type and source of  shelter assistance received; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422478","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2336","label":"Number and percentage of households in need of shelter assistance","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-1-1","code":"S1-1-1","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator aims to identify the caseload for the shelter response, within the overall population affected by the emergency.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"Total number of surveyed households","numerator":"Number of households in need of shelter assistance","disaggregation":"Type of  shelter assistance needed (cash; material; labour; other); Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1416314252","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, E1.1 Equal Access, PL1 HLP Documentation, PL2 Access to Land, PL3 HLP Disputes, P5 Vulnerability, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":"For Standards: See also: Sphere: Shelter and settlement standard 1: Strategic planning, key indicator 1: Shelter and settlement solutions to meet the essential needs of all the disasteraffected\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\npopulation are agreed with the population themselves and relevant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nauthorities in coordination with all responding agencies (see guidance note 1)"},{"id":"2242","label":"Percentage of shelter-related non-food item interventions taking into account impact on the environment ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s2-2-4","code":"S2-2-4","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S2.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EShelter cluster or relevant shelter sector coordination mechanism should define context-specific and measurable indicators with related guidance for assessing the impact of shelter solutions on the environment. Consider unsustainable resource use, encroachment in sensitive areas, use of environmentally friendly construction techniques, and land degradation issues  (loss of forest, mangrove, or wetland)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of NFI interventions","numerator":"Number of NFI interventions taking into account impact on the environment ","disaggregation":"Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter intervention; Type of shelter responder (local, national, or international; governmental or non-governmental; faith-based or secular; etc.) ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422478","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2138","label":"Average cost of housing construction materials ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-1-4","code":"S1-1-4","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe average cost of commonly-used housing construction material should be tracked over time as a key indicator of availability and accessibility of such items ; as well as the impact on the market of in kind humanitarian aid on such items\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"","numerator":"Costs of essential shelter materials ","disaggregation":"Pre \/ Post emergency prices (including evolution over time from emergency onset); types of material","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2113","label":"Percentage of shelter solutions incorporating accessibility measures for people with specific needs","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-8","code":"S1-2-8","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicators aims to evaluate how the settlement solution is inclusive, and in particular physical accessibility, are addressed as part of the shelter support provided to beneficiary households, especially those including persons with specific needs such as persons living with disabilities, older persons, children, etc.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of shelter interventions","numerator":"Number of shelter  interventions","disaggregation":"Type of measures implemented as part of shelter solution provided with an accessible approach (steps, handrails, ramp, dors, locks); Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of response provider (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2241","label":"Number of persons \/ households \/ communities provided with training related to non-food item assistance ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s2-2-2","code":"S2-2-2","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S2.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENon-food item training could cover a broad range of issues within the shelter sector. As part of the training evaluation, participants should be asked whether or not they have implemented the learnings from the training.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"","numerator":"Number of persons \/ households \/ communities provided with training related to NFI assistance ","disaggregation":"Type and theme of training; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393599911","changed":"1415968446","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":"For STANDARDS:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSee also: Sphere: NFI standard 5: Tools and fixings, Key Indicator 2: All households or community groups have access to training and awareness-raising in the safe use of tools and fixings provided."},{"id":"2243","label":"Percentage of shelter solutions incorporating measures to prevent\/mitigate security risks, in particular gender based violence, for beneficiary households","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-7","code":"S1-2-7","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicators aims to evaluate how security risks, and in particular gender based violence, are addressed as part of the shelter and non-food item support provided to beneficiary households, especially the most vulnerable households such as women-headed households.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of shelter interventions","numerator":"Number of shelter interventions","disaggregation":"Type of security measures implemented as part of the shelter solutions (doors, locks, fixed lighting, flashlights, portable radios, re-inforced shelter structure\/cover material, etc.); Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of response provider (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)  ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422478","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2115","label":"Number and percentage of households in need of non-food items","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s2-1-1","code":"S2-1-1","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S2.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator identifies the overall caseload for the NFI response.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of surveyed households","numerator":"Number of households in need of non-food items","disaggregation":"Type of  non-food item needed; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family) ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1416314786","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, W1.1 Hygiene items, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2122","label":"Percentage of beneficiary households satisfied with the  shelter-related energy suppprt they receive(d)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s3-2-5","code":"S3-2-5","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S3.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe indicator enables beneficiaries of energy to feedback on the degree of satisfaction on the assistance received\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of households receiving energy assistance ","numerator":"number of beneficiary households satisfied with the  energy assistance they receive(d)","disaggregation":"Type and source of  energy\/fuel assistance received; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter responder (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)  ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2240","label":"Number of persons \/ households \/ communities provided with training related to energy\/fuel assistance ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s3-2-2","code":"S3-2-2","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S3.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EEnergy\/fuel training could cover a broad range of issues within the shelter sector. As part of the training evaluation, participants should be asked whether or not they have implemented the learnings from the training.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"","numerator":"Number of persons \/ households \/ communities provided with training related to energy\/fuel assistance ","disaggregation":"Type and theme of training; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422478","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2239","label":"Number of persons \/ households \/ communities provided with training related to shelter assistance ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-4","code":"S1-2-4","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EShelter and non-food item (including energy) training could cover a broad range of issues within the shelter sector.  As part of the training evaluation, participants should be asked whether or not they have implemented the learnings from the training.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"","numerator":"Number of persons \/ households \/ communities provided with training related to shelter assistance ","disaggregation":"Type and theme of training; Age; Sex; Specific groups \/ categories of persons (ethnicity, religion, disability; etc.);  Individual status (i.e. refugee, IDP, host community)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422478","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2121","label":"Percentage of shelter-related energy\/fuel interventions taking into account impact on the environment ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s3-2-4","code":"S3-2-4","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S3.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EShelter cluster or relevant shelter sector coordination mechanism should define context-specific and measurable indicators with related guidance for assessing the impact of shelter solutions on the environment. Consider unsustainable resource use, encroachment in sensitive areas, use of environmentally friendly construction techniques, and land degradation issues  (loss of forest, mangrove, or wetland)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of energy\/fuel interventions","numerator":"Number of energy\/fuel interventions taking into account impact on the environment ","disaggregation":"Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter intervention; Type of shelter responder (local, national, or international; governmental or non-governmental; faith-based or secular; etc.) ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2244","label":"Number and percentage of damaged houses \/ dwellings ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-1-3","code":"S1-1-3","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator focuses on the impact of the crisis \/ disaster on housing structures by degree of damage, enabling the development of a well targetted shelter response and associated response monitoring. Shelter damage category are to be defined at country level as relevant. It is recommended to have three to five levels of damage. (1) No Damage; (2) Partially Damaged; (3) Completely Destroyed. Partially damaged could be furher broken down into: (2.1) Minor damage; (2.2) Significant damage but habitable; ie: structurally sound; (2.3) Severely damaged and inhabitable; structurally not-sound\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number ","denominator":" Total number of surveyed houses \/ dwellings","numerator":"Number of damaged houses \/ dwellings","disaggregation":" Settlement type (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal; etc.); Housing type (house \/ appartment); Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier \/ renter; no tenure);  Sex and age ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422478","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2120","label":"Percentage of beneficiary households using shelter-related energy\/fuel  assistance as a means to address other needs ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s3-2-3","code":"S3-2-3","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S3.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator evaluates the appropriateness of the type of assistance provided. Beneficiaries of shelter-related energy\/fuel assistance may have used the assistance they receive(d) for a different purpose than originally intended. For instance, beneficiaries may sell or exchange fuel in order to address other humanitarian needs such as food, water or health.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of households receiving energy\/fuel assistance ","numerator":"Number of beneficiary households using energy\/fuel assistance as a means to address other needs ","disaggregation":"Type and source of  energy\/fuel support received; Shelter damage category; Sex and age ; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter responder (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)  ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2119","label":"Number and percentage of affected households provided with assistance to cover energy needs","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s3-2-1","code":"S3-2-1","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S3.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator aims to gather disaggregated data on number households supported with energy assistance. It is important to collect information separately from men and women as they will have received different types of energy support.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"Total number of affected households","numerator":"Number of affected households provided with assistance to cover energy needs","disaggregation":"Type of energy support (different stoves \/ fuel types; etc); Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of response provider (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2118","label":"Number and percentage of affected households requiring assistance to cover their energy needs ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s3-1-1","code":"S3-1-1","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S3.1 Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator identifies the overall caseload for supporting energy requirements of affected populations. Energy needs include all activities for which households need fuel: cooking, heating, lighting, etc. It is particularly imporatnt to track where winterisation interventions are planned. It is important to collect information separately from men and women as they have differing energy needs.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"Total number of surveyed households","numerator":"Number of households requiring assistance to cover energy needs","disaggregation":"Type of energy support (different stoves \/ fuel types; etc);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family) ","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1415968919","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2117","label":"Percentage of beneficiary households satisfied with the  shelter-related non-food items they receive(d)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s2-2-5","code":"S2-2-5","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S2.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe indicator enables beneficiaries of NFI to feedback on the degree of satisfaction on the assistance received\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of households receiving NFI assistance ","numerator":"number of beneficiary households satisfied with the  NFI assistance they receive(d)","disaggregation":"Type and source of  NFI assistance received; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter responder (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)  ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2116","label":"Percentage of beneficiary households using shelter-related NFI assistance as a means to address other needs ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s2-2-3","code":"S2-2-3","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S2.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator evaluates the appropriateness of the type of assistance provided. Beneficiaries of shelter-related non-food item assistance may have used the assistance they receive(d) for a different purpose than originally intended. For instance, beneficiaries may sell or exchange non food items in order to address other humanitarian needs such as food, water or health.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of households receiving NFI assistance ","numerator":"Number of beneficiary households using NFI assistance as a means to address other needs ","disaggregation":"Type and source of  NFI support received; Shelter damage category; Sex and age ; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter responder (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)  ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2114","label":"Percentage of beneficiary households satisfied with the  shelter assistance they receive(d)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/s1-2-9","code":"S1-2-9","global_clusters":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","domain":"S1.2 Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe indicator enables beneficiaries of shelter to feedback on the degree of satisfaction on the assistance received\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of households receiving shelter assistance ","numerator":"number of beneficiary households satisfied with the  shelter assistance they receive(d)","disaggregation":"Type and source of  shelter assistance received; Sex and age; Household tenure situation (owner \/ owner-occupier; renter; no tenure);  Type of settlement (urban \/ rural; formal \/ informal) or displacement site\/situation (self-settled \/ planned camp; collective centre; host family); Type of shelter responder (national or international; governmental or non-governmental; etc.)  ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393599911","changed":"1398422500","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"PL1 HLP Documentation, PL2 Access to Land, PL3 HLP Disputes, PL4 Security of tenure for informal rights holders or vulnerable groups, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2228","label":"Number and Percentage of health facilities supported by humanitarian organisations","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a9b","code":"H-A.9b","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIndicator of support by health cluster partners beside MoH to the health system; in very disrupted health system can be a proxy for functional health facilities\/services as non-supported health facilities have stopped functioning\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"","denominator":"Number of health facilities supported by stakeholders other than MoH in a defined administrative or health area at a given point in time\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of health facilities in the same administrative or health area at a given point in time\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"administrative area; health area; type of health facilities, i.e. basic health units, health centres, rural\/district hospitals\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393439704","changed":"1424794985","data_sources":"Numerator:  3 Ws , Denominator: census of health facilities\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"\u0026quot;Calculation: only sustained comprehensive support should be included, e.g. staffing support to run\/manage the facility; one-off medicine supplies or equipment, for example, should not be included. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSupport should be further measured, wherever possible, against established needs as explained under A.1.a and A.1.b\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nInterpretation: this indicator can be used to assess gaps and overlaps in the health response\u0026quot;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...                                                  \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Follow-up of trends\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"Health Resource Availability Mapping System HeRAMS (http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac\/global_health_cluster\/guide\/tools\/en\/)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2234","label":"Number of functional health facility with Basic Emergency Obstetric Care (BEmOC) per 500,000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a2a","code":"H-A.2a","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy indicator for the physical availability and geographical accessibility of emergency obstetric services and their distribution across districts. An unbalance between the availability of BEmOC and CEmOC (with too few BEmOC) is often observed.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area, at the same point in time\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of functional health facilities, i.e. all public and private health facilities, with Basic Emergency Obstetric Care in a defined administrative or health area at a certain point in time\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; public\/private; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393439242","changed":"1424794789","data_sources":"Numerator: census of health facilities; assessment of functionality of health facilities; assessment of service availability (eg SARA, HeRAMS); Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health area;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"Calculation: BEmOC includes parenteral antibiotics, oxytocic\/anticonvulsant drugs, manual removal of placenta, removal of retained products with manual vacuum aspiration (MVA), assisted vaginal delivery available 24 hours and 7 days Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a certain period of time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator will indicate the baseline availability of health services. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health services) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in term of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health services. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of health services but does not measure access to the service by the popualtion nor the quality of service and is therefore only a proxy for coverage. Quality of services (including trained staff and adequate supplies) should be further appraised.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities and assessment of service availability should be available pre-crisis through the realisation of SARA or HeRAMS.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P1 (PC) Child Protection, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026gt;= 4 health facilities with Basic Emergency Obstetric Care\/ 500,000 population Follow-up of trends\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"\u0026quot;Further guidance: Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care (http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/monitoring\/9789241547734\/en\/)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u0026quot;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2227","label":"Number and Percentage of non functional health facilities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a9a","code":"H-A.9a","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIndicator of the consequence of the crisis on the availability of the health services\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"","denominator":"Number of health facilities in the same administrative or health area at the same point in time\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of non-functional health facilities in a defined administrative or health area at a given point in time\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"administrative area; health area; type of health facilities, i.e. basic health units, health centres, rural\/district hospitals\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393438754","changed":"1424794952","data_sources":"Numerator: assessment of functionality of health facilities Denominator: census of health facilities\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"Calculation: A facility is considered non-functional when health care activities cannot take place e.g. because of destruction of building, absence of personnel or no supplies. If some activities can be conducted, even partially and\/or non-optimally, the structure is considered functional. Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a given point in time. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health facilities) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in terms of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health facilities.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Follow-up of trends\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":""},{"id":"2224","label":"Number of functional basic health units\/10 000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a1a","code":"H-A.1.a","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy indicator of geographical accessibility, and of equity in availability of health facilities across different administrative units.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area, at the same point in time","numerator":"The number of basic health units, i.e. all public and private health facilities, defined as a static facility (a designated building) or mobile clinics in which general health services are offered, in a defined administrative or health area, at a given point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; public\/private; fixed\/mobile; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393438549","changed":"1424794614","data_sources":"Numerator: census of health facilities; assessment of functionality of health facilities; 3 Ws Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health area;","general_guidance":"Calculation: Basic health unit is related to the lowest level of health facility at the national level. This indicator can be adjusted to measure the support provided by one or several humanitarian organisations beside the MoH: number of functional basic health units supported by humanitarian organisation\/10 000 population. Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a given point in time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator indicates the baseline availability of functional health facilities. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health facilities) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in terms of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health facilities. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of health facilities but does not measure access to the facilities by the population nor the quality of service provided. It is therefore only a proxy for coverage.","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities, administrative boundaries, health areas boundaries, population per administrative areas,and population per health areas should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument; the indicator itself could be available pre-crisis.","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"1 Basic Health Unit per 10,000 population Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring the building blocks of the health system (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/monitoring\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2235","label":"Number of functional health facilities with Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care (CEmOC) per 500,000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a2","code":"H-A.2","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy indicator for the physical availability and geographical accessibility of emergency obstetric services and their distribution across districts in the affected areas. An unbalance between the availability of BEmOC and CEmOC (with too few BEmOC) is often observed.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area, at the same point in time","numerator":"Number of functional health facilities, i.e. all public and private health facilities, with Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care in a defined administrative or health area at a certain point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; public\/private; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393438549","changed":"1424794740","data_sources":"Numerator: census of health facilities; assessment of functionality of health facilities; assessment of service availability (eg SARA, HeRAMS); Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health area;","general_guidance":"Calculation: CEmOC includes BEmOC plus caesarian sesction plus safe blood transfusion available 24 hours and 7 days Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a certain period of time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator will indicate the baseline availability of health services. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health services) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in term of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health services. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of health services but does not measure access to the service by the popualtion nor the quality of service and is therefore only a proxy for coverage. Quality of services (including trained staff and adequate supplies) should be further appraised.","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities and assessment of service availability should be available pre-crisis through the realisation of SARA or HeRAMS.","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P1 (PC) Child Protection, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026gt;= 1 health facilities with Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care\/ 500,000 population; Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care (http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/monitoring\/9789241547734\/en\/)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2236","label":"Percentage of births assisted by a skilled attendant","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-c5","code":"H-C.5","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy measure for the utilization rate of obstetrics services in health facilities and in communities where Village-Trained Midwives are operating. It is a measure of a health system?s ability to provide adequate care for pregnant women during labour and delivery.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Estimated total number of births in the same administrative or health area in the same period of time","numerator":"Number of births in a defined administrative or health area in a given period of time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393438549","changed":"1424795149","data_sources":"Numerator: routine health facility reporting system Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health areas; fertility rate (from DHS, for example) Alternatively numerator and denominator can be recorded through household surveys","general_guidance":"Calculation: Numerator: A skilled birth attendant is an accredited health professional ? such as a midwife, doctor or nurse ? who has been educated and trained to proficiency in the skills needed to manage normal (uncomplicated) pregnancies, childbirth and the immediate postnatal period, and in the identification, management and referral of complications in women and newborns. Traditional birth attendants, trained or not, are excluded from the category of skilled attendant at delivery. Denominator should be calculated by using the fertility rate by age class and region (e.g. obtained via demographic and health surveys). In Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, the expected proportion of births is between 4 and 5 % of the total population. Alternatively, percentage of births assisted by a skilled attendant can be assessed through household surveys where the numerator is the number of reported deliveries over a certain period of time assisted by a skilled attendant and the denominator is the reported number of births over the same period of time. Interpretation: This indicator can serve as a proxy for monitoring progress in the health response. Limitations: the indicator may not sufficiently capture women?s access to high quality care, particularly when complications arise. It also does not provide information on availability of any supplies and equipment a skilled attendant may need. Both administrative and household survey methods have limitations. The calculation of the number of births from administrative population number and fertility rates can be very imprecise. Reporting bias in houshold surveys can lead to imprecision in the estimate.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc... Periodical household surveys should be considered. Households surveys will be more doable in later phases of the emergency.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P1 (PC) Child Protection, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026gt;90% Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: monitoring maternal and newborn child health (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthmetrics\/news\/monitoring_maternal_newborn_child_health.pdf)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2238","label":"Percentage of functional health facilities with clinical management of rape survivor services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a6","code":"H-A.6","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H4.3 Sexual violence","description":"\u003Cp\u003EKey indicator to measure the allocation of resources and the availability of services to address consequences of sexual violence.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Total number of functional health facilities in the same administrative or health area at the same point in time","numerator":"Number of functional health facilities, i.e. all public and private health facilities, with clinical management of rape survivors in a defined administrative or health area at a certain point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; public\/private; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393438549","changed":"1424794831","data_sources":"Numerator: assessment of service availability (eg SARA, HeRAMS); Denominator: census of health facilities; assessment of functionality of health facilities;","general_guidance":"Calculation: should include clinical management of rape survivor plus contraception and PEP as a target. However countries must define which elements of this package are in place to define the locally appropriate monitoring package. Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a certain period of time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator will indicate the baseline availability of health services. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health services) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in term of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health services. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of health services but does not measure access to the service by the popualtion nor the quality of service and is therefore only a proxy for coverage. Quality of services (including trained staff and adequate supplies) should be further appraised.","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities and assessment of service availability should be available pre-crisis through the realisation of SARA or HeRAMS.","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"PC3 Sexual violence, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG4 Advocacy, awareness, education with affected populations, local authorities, international community, PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PG6 Prevention Programming, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"100% of health facilities with clinical management of rape survivor services Follow-up of trends","comments":""},{"id":"2237","label":"Percentage of deliveries by caesarean section","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-c6","code":"H-C.6","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe proportion of all deliveries by caesarean section in a geographical area is a measure of access to and use of a common obstetric interventions for averting maternal and neonatal deaths and for preventing complications such as obstetric fistula. Of all the procedures used to treat major obstetric complications, caesarean section is one of the commonest, and reporting is relatively reliable.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Estimated total number of births in the same administrative or health area in the same period of time","numerator":"Number of births by Caesarean section in a defined administrative or health area in a given period of time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393438549","changed":"1424795200","data_sources":"Numerator: routine health faicility reporting system; Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health areas; fertility rate (from DHS, for example) Alternatively numerator and denominator can be recorded through household surveys","general_guidance":"Calculation: Denominator should be calculated by using the fertility rate by age class and region (e.g. obtained via demographic and health surveys). In Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, the expected proportion of births is between 4 and 5 % of the total population. Alternatively, percentage of deliveries by Caesarean section can be assessed through household surveys where the numerator is the number of reported deliveries by Caesarian section over a certain period of time and the denominator is the reported number of births over the same period of time. Interpretation: This indicator can serve as a proxy for monitoring progress in the health response. Limitations: Both administrative and household survey methods have limitations. The calculation of the number of births from administrative population number and fertility rates can be very imprecise. Reporting bias in houshold surveys can lead to imprecision in the estimate.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc... Periodical household surveys should be considered. Households surveys will be more doable in later phases of the emergency.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, P1 (PC) Child Protection, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026gt;=5% and \u0026lt;=15% of deliveries by ceasarian section Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care (http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/monitoring\/9789241547734\/en\/)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2233","label":"Case Fatality Ratio (CFR) for most common diseases","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-r3","code":"H-R.3","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H3 Communicable diseases, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProbability of dying as a result of a given disease. Is a result of a mixture of disease severity and quality of health care.\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"","denominator":"Total number of cases related to the disease in the same administrative or health area and the same time period\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Total number of fatalities related to the disease in a defined administrative or health area in a given time period\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; sex\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393438464","changed":"1424795233","data_sources":"Numerator: health facility based surveillance; routine health facility reporting system Denominator: health facility based surveillance; routine health facility reporting system\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"Interpretation: the CFR is an indicator of the quality of case management, late arrival at the facility or severity of disease. Limitations: most likely to be biased upwards because only more severe cases normally go to clinics.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, (R) Early Recovery, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Cholera\u00a0: 1 per cent or lower; Shigella dysentery\u00a0: 1 per cent or lower; typhoid\u00a0: 1 per cent or lower; meningococcal meningitis\u00a0: varies, 5-15 per cent; malaria\u00a0: varies, aim for \u0026lt;5 per cent in severely ill malaria patients; measles\u00a0: varies, 2-21 per cent reported in conflict-affected settings, aim for \u0026lt;5 per cent. Follow-up of trends\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"Further guidance: IDSR guide CDC Afro. NB: This indicator is relevant to WASH only for certain diseases. (http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/globalhealth\/dphswd\/idsr\/pdf\/Technical%20Guidelines\/IDSR%20Technical%20Guidelines%202nd%20Edition_2010_English.pdf)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2226","label":"Number of functional district-rural hospitals\/250 000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a1c","code":"H-A.1.c","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy indicator of geographical accessibility, and of equity in availability of Health Facilties across different administrative units\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area, at the same point in time","numerator":"The number of district\/rural hospitals, i.e. all public and private district-rural hospitals, including field hospitals, in a defined administrative or health area, at a given point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; public\/private; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424794693","data_sources":"Numerator: census of health facilities; assessment of functionality of health facilities; 3 Ws Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health area;","general_guidance":"Calculation: This indicator can be adjusted to measure the support provided by one or several humanitarian organisations beside the MoH: number of functional rural\/district hospitals supported by humanitarian organisation\/250 000 population. Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a given point in time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator indicates the baseline availability of functional health facilities. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the needs in terms of support to health facilities and the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health facilities) when compared to pre-crisis. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health facilities. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of health facilities but does not measure access to the facilities by the population nor the quality of service provided. It is therefore only a proxy for coverage.","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities, administrative boundaries, health areas boundaries, population per administrative areas,and population per health areas should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument; the indicator itself could be available pre-crisis.","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG4 Advocacy, awareness, education with affected populations, local authorities, international community, PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"1 Rural\/District Hospital per 250 000 population Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring the building blocks of the health system  (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/monitoring\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2232","label":"Incidence for selected diseases relevant to the local context","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-r1","code":"H-R.1","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H3 Communicable diseases, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","description":"\u003Cp\u003EUseful measure of the burden of diseases and detect outbreaks. The list of diseases is context specific and can include communicable and non-communicable diseases.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Total population in the same administrative or health area and at the same time period","numerator":"Number of cases of selected disease in a defined administrative or health area in a given period of time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; age (usually \u0026lt; 5 years; \u0026gt;= 5 years)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424795213","data_sources":"Numerator: EWARS, health facility based surveillance, routine health facility reporting system Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health areas;","general_guidance":"Calculation: incidence rate, i.e. number of cases per pers per time period, should be calculated, especially when large population movement occurs; however, in many settings, accurate calculation of incidence is severely limited by inaccurate population data, and total number of cases seen should be used instead. Proportional morbidity (cases of disease divided by total cases and expressed as a percentage) is also useful when the population denominators are unknown or changing. Interpretation: can be used both for detection of outbreaks and for monitoring of the effect of the health response. Limitations: Health facility surveillance may have low sensitivity for conditions that do not commonly go to clinic. Access to health services is another factor.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, (R) Early Recovery, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Thresholds for alert\/outbreak depending on disease Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Outbreak surveillance and response in humanitarian emergencies (http:\/\/whqlibdoc.who.int\/hq\/2012\/WHO_HSE_GAR_DCE_2012_1_eng.pdf)"},{"id":"2231","label":"coverage of DTP3 in \u0026lt; 1 year old (%)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-c4","code":"H-C.4","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H2 Child health","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIndicators used for estimating the vaccine coverage of the total EPI strategy. To avoid overestimation, measles vaccination coverage is often used as a proxy since it is usually lower than DTP3 coverage.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Estimated number of infants (under 12 months of age) in the same year","numerator":"Number of infants (under 12 months of age) who received DTP3 in a given year","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424795136","data_sources":"Numerator: routine health facility reporting system Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health areas; Alternatively numerator and denominator can be recorded through household surveys","general_guidance":"Calculation: DTP3 coverage refers to the percentage of one-year-olds who have received three doses of the combined diphtheria, tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine in a given year; Limitations: The coverage estimates calculated using the administrative method can be biased due to inaccurate numerators or denominators. Numerators may be underestimated (due to incomplete reporting from reporting units or non-inclusion of other vaccinating sources (e.g. private sector, non-governmental organizations), or overestimated (due to over-reporting from reporting units e.g. inclusion of other target groups) Denominator inaccuracies may be due to issues such as: population movement, inaccurate census estimations or projections and\/or numerous sources of denominator data Alternatively, vaccination coverage can be estimated by household surveys, where the numerator will be the number of children in a given age range vaccinated and the denominator will be the total number of children in the same age range in the survey.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc... Periodical household vaccination coverage surveys should be considered, particularly following a campaign. Households surveys will be more doable in later phases of the emergency.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"\u0026gt;95% Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Immunisation coverage (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/WHO_MBHSS_2010_full_web.pdf)"},{"id":"2343","label":"Number and percentage of functional health facilities providing selected relevant services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a9","code":"H-A.9","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H3 Communicable diseases, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy indicator for the physical availability and geographical accessibility of selected services relevant to the local context.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area, at the same point in time","numerator":"The number of basic health units, i.e. all public and private health facilities, defined as a static facility (a designated building) or mobile clinics in which general health services are offered, in a defined administrative or health area, at a given point in time","disaggregation":"administrative area; health area; health services; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424794923","data_sources":"Numerator: assessment of service availability (e.g. SARA, HeRAMS); Denominator: census of health facilities; assessment of functionality of health facilities;","general_guidance":"Calculation: relevant services and package of services should be chosen according to the local context. Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a certain period of time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator will indicate the baseline availability of health services. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health services) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in term of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health services. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of health services but does not measure access to the service by the popualtion nor the quality of service and is therefore only a proxy for coverage. Quality of services (including trained staff and adequate supplies) should be further appraised.","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities and assessment of service availability should be available pre-crisis through the realisation of SARA or HeRAMS.","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, F1 Food Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PG6 Prevention Programming, PM4 Victim Assistance, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Depending on services and country; Follow-up of trends","comments":"Health Resource Availability Mapping System HeRAMS (http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac\/global_health_cluster\/guide\/tools\/en\/)"},{"id":"2225","label":"Number of functional health centres\/50 000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a1b","code":"H-A.1.b","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy indicator of geographical accessibility, and of equity in availability of Health Facilties across different administrative units\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area, at the same point in time","numerator":"The number of basic health units, i.e. all public and private health facilities, defined as a static facility (a designated building) or mobile clinics in which general health services are offered, in a defined administrative or health area, at a given point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; public\/private; fixed\/mobile; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424794676","data_sources":"Numerator: census of health facilities; assessment of functionality of health facilities; 3 Ws Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health area;","general_guidance":"Calculation: This indicator can be adjusted to measure the support provided by one or several humanitarian organisations beside the MoH: number of health centres supported by humanitarian organisation\/50 000 population. Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a given point in time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator indicates the baseline availability of functional health facilities. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health facilities) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in terms of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health facilities. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of health facilities but does not measure access to the facilities by the population nor the quality of service provided. It is therefore only a proxy for coverage.","guidance_baseline":"Census of health facilities, administrative boundaries, health areas boundaries, population per administrative areas,and population per health areas should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument; the indicator itself could be available pre-crisis.","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"1 Health Centre per 50 000 population Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring the building blocks of the health system (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/monitoring\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2342","label":"Number of Community Health Workers per 10,000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a8","code":"H-A.8","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIndicator monitoring the availability of human resources key to delivering community-based intervention.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area at the same point in time","numerator":"Total number of community health workers in crisis affected areas in a defined administrative or health area at a given point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative Area; health area; sex of community health workers; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424794904","data_sources":"Numerator: health statistics; assessment of service availability (eg SARA, HeRAMS); Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health areas;","general_guidance":"Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a certain period of time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator will indicate the baseline availability of work force. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in work force reporting to the facilities) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in term of support. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health services. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of work force but does not measure the competencies of the work force. Competencies should be further appraised.","guidance_baseline":"Number of health workers, administrative boundaries, health areas boundaries, population per administrative areas and population per health areas should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026gt;=10 community health workers per 10 000 population Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring the building blocks of the health system (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/monitoring\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2230","label":"Coverage of measles vaccination (%)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-c3","code":"H-C.3","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMeasles coverage refers to the percentage of children who have received at least one dose of measles-containing vaccine in a given year. This indicator is used for estimating the vaccine coverage of the total EPI strategy. To avoid overestimation, measles vaccination coverage is often used as a proxy since it is usually lower than DPT3 coverage.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Estimated total number of children in the target age group in the same administrative or health area in the same period of time","numerator":"Number of children in the target age group who received measles vaccination in a defined administrative or health area in a given period of time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424795100","data_sources":"Numerator: routine health facility reporting system Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health areas; Alternatively numerator and denominator can be recorded through household surveys","general_guidance":"Calculation: Measles vaccination coverage can be estimated after a mass vaccination campaign and for EPI; target age group should be determined according to local circumstances. Limitations: The coverage estimates calculated using the administrative method can be biased due to inaccurate numerators or denominators. Numerators may be underestimated (due to incomplete reporting from reporting units or non-inclusion of other vaccinating sources (e.g. private sector, non-governmental organizations), or overestimated (due to over-reporting from reporting units e.g. inclusion of other target groups) Denominator inaccuracies may be due to issues such as: population movement, inaccurate census estimations or projections and\/or numerous sources of denominator data Alternatively, vaccination coverage can be estimated by household surveys, where the numerator will be the number of children in a given age range vaccinated and the denominator will be the total number of children in the same age range in the survey.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc... Periodical household vaccination coverage surveys should be considered, particularly following a campaign. Households surveys will be more doable in later phases of the emergency.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"\u0026gt; 95% in camps or urban areas; \u0026gt; 90% in rural areas Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Immunisation coverage (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/WHO_MBHSS_2010_full_web.pdf)"},{"id":"2340","label":"Number of inpatient beds per 10,000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a5","code":"H-A.5","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIndicator for the availability of hospital beds across crisis areas and proxy indicator of equity in the allocation of resources.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area, at the same point in time","numerator":"Number of inpatient beds in functional health facilities, i.e. all public and private health facilities, in a defined administrative or health area at a given point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; public\/private; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424794815","data_sources":"Numerator: health statistics; assessment of service availability (eg SARA, HeRAMS); Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health area;","general_guidance":"Calculation: this includes total hospital beds (for long-term and acute care), maternity beds and paediatric beds, but not delivery beds. Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a certain period of time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator will indicate the baseline availability of health services. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in availability of health services) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in term of support to health facilities. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health services. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of inpatient beds but does not measure access by the popualtion.","guidance_baseline":"Number of inpatient beds, administrative boundaries, health areas boundaries, population per administrative areas and population per health areas should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PM4 Victim Assistance, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"\u0026gt;10 inpatient beds per 10 000 population Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring the building blocks of the health system (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/monitoring\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2229","label":"Number of consultations per clinician per day","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-c2","code":"H-C.2","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMeasure for the workload and proxy indicator of the quality of care.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Number of full-time equivalent clinicians in the outpatient departement in the same health facility x number of working days in the same health facility in period of analysis","numerator":"Number of outpatient consultations in a given health facility during a given period of time","disaggregation":"","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424795071","data_sources":"Numerator: routine health facility reporting system Denominator: health statistics","general_guidance":"Calculation: Numerator: outpatient consultations include new and repeated cases; denominator: a clinician is a health care practitioner that works as a primary care giver in outpatient department. This can include physicians, midwives, nurses and paramedics.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026lt; 50 consultations per clinician per day Follow-up of trends","comments":""},{"id":"2341","label":"Number of health workers per 10,000 population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-a7","code":"H-A.7","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EKey indicator to monitor the availability of health workers. It can serve as a proxy to monitor equity in the allocation of resources by humanitarian actors across different groups within the humanitarian case load and\/or crisis affected population versus local populations.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same geographical or health area at a certain point in time","numerator":"Total number of health workers (medical doctor + nurse + midwife) in a defined administrative or health area at a certain point in time","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; sex of health workers; level of health workers (medical doctor, nurse, midwife); support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424794879","data_sources":"Numerator: health statistics; assessment of service availability (eg SARA, HeRAMS); Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health area;","general_guidance":"Calculation: health workers include medical doctors, nurses and midwifes Interpretation: This indicator is a snapshot of the situation at a certain period of time. At the pre-crisis phase, this indicator will indicate the baseline availability of work force. In the early phase after a crisis occurs, this indicator will show the consequences of the crisis (decrease\/reduction in work force reporting to the facilities) when compared to pre-crisis and the needs in term of support. At later stages of crisis, trends in this indicator will allow to monitor the response in supporting health services. There is no consensus about optimal level of health workers for a population. Limitation: this indicator measures the availability of work force but does not measure the competencies of the work force. Competencies should be further appraised.","guidance_baseline":"Number of health workers, administrative boundaries, health areas boundaries, population per administrative areas and population per health areas should be available for crisis-prone countries, possibly as part of the COD\/FOD, as a prepardness instrument","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C2.3 Service Provision, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.10 Service Provision - Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P1 (PC) Child Protection, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG1 Developing Referral Pathway for Survivors, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026gt; 22 health workers per 10 000 population Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring the building blocks of the health system (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/monitoring\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2108","label":"Number of outpatient consultations per person per year (attendance rate or consultation rate)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/h-c1","code":"H-C.1","global_clusters":"Health","domain":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProxy indicator for accessibility and utilization of health services that may reflect the quality of services. It does not measure the coverage of this service, but the average number of visits in a defined population.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"The total population for the same administrative or health area","numerator":"The number of visits to health facilities, i.e. all public and private health facilities and mobile clinics, for ambulant care in a defined administrative or health area during a year","disaggregation":"Administrative area; health area; age; sex; support\/no support from humanitarian organisations;","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393437931","changed":"1424795046","data_sources":"Numerator: routine health facility reporting system; Denominator: administrative boundaries; health areas boundaries; population per administrative area; population per health areas;","general_guidance":"Calculation: The numerator is defined as the number of visits to health facilities for ambulant care, not including immunization (can be divided into children under five years of age and aged five years and over); The attendance rate is usually calculated annualy. It can be used, nevertheless, to monitor the monthly evolution. In that case, the denominator (target population) should be divided by 12 for keeping the same unit. Interpretation: the patient volumes at outpatient facilities are not a coverage indicator because the population in need is not well defined. Low rates, however, are indicative of poor availability and quality of services. For example, several countries have demonstrated that outpatient department rates go up when constraints to using health services are removed, such as by bringing services closer to the people or reducing user fees. In contrast, once rates exceed a certain threshold the number of visits is no longer an indicator of the strength of the health services.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"There is a differing level of quality of data which can be collected at different phases of the emergency depending on the context, eg the data available and the systems for data collection in place before the crisis, the accessibility of the affected areas, the resources on the ground, etc...","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, PC1 Dangers and Injuries, PC2 Physical violence and other harmful practices, PC3 Sexual violence, PC4 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, PG3 Multi sectoral engagement (health, legal\/justice, security, psychosocial), PG5 Data collection, storage and sharing, PM4 Victim Assistance, P7 Documentation, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"\u0026gt; = 1 new visit\/person per year Follow-up of trends","comments":"Further guidance: Monitoring the building blocks of the health  (http:\/\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/systems\/monitoring\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2021","label":" IYCF support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-097","code":"N-097","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of caregivers received skilled IYCF support\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of caregivers eligible to receive skilled IYCF support according to national protocols  surveyed","numerator":"Number of caregivers received skilled IYCF support","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872166","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":"\u0026quot;skilled \u0026quot;should be defined"},{"id":"2020","label":"Infants who have access to BMS supplies and support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-081","code":"N-081","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of non-breastfed infants under 6 months of age who have access to BMS supplies and support\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of non-breastfed infants under 6 months of age in surveyed area","numerator":"Total number of non-breastfed infants under 6 months of age who have access to BMS supplies and support","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871965","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2019","label":"The code labelling of BMS","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-095","code":"N-095","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where the labels of BMS DO NOT comply with the labelling requirements of the Code\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of programs where BMS are provided","numerator":"Number of programs where labels do not comply with the CODE","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872140","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2018","label":"IYCF in HIV context","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-096","code":"N-096","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes that follows national policy on HIV\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of programmes","numerator":"Number of programmes where individual risk assessment (applying AFASS criteria) is carried out on an ongoing basis for artificially fed infants","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872153","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2017","label":"Body to deal with donations","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-109","code":"N-109","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA body to deal with any donations of BMS, milk products, bottles and teats is designated\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872349","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All phases","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Yes","comments":""},{"id":"2016","label":"IYCF-E orphans and unaccompanied children receiving services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-098","code":"N-098","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of orphans and unaccompanied infants and  children 0-23 months who receive nutritional and care support\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"Total number of orphans, unaccompanied infants and young children in need of nutritional care and support","numerator":"Number of orphans, unaccompanied young children and young children who receive nutritional care and support","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872177","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2015","label":"Voucher\/cash IYCF","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-099","code":"N-099","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of voucher\/cash programmes targeting families with children U2 with an IYCF objective\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of voucher\/cash programmes targeting families with children U2 with an IYCF objective","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872195","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2014","label":"Voucher\/cash infants","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-100","code":"N-100","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of voucher\/cash programmes targeting families with infants under 6 months with a breastfeeding objective\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of voucher\/cash programmes targeting families with infants under 6 months with a breastfeeding objective","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872209","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2013","label":"Code violations followed up","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-101","code":"N-101","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of reported code violations which were followed up\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of reported code violations","numerator":"Number of reported code violations which were followed up","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872224","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All phases","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Target - 100%","comments":""},{"id":"2012","label":"Satisfaction with access to services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-104","code":"N-104","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of target population disaggregated by sex satisfied with their access to services at the end of the project\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of men\/women benefited from the project","numerator":"Number of men\/women satisfied with their access to services at the end of the project","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, response domain","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872269","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phases  III, IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Target - 100%","comments":""},{"id":"2100","label":"Donations not intercepted ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-094","code":"N-094","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of  donations of BMS, complementary foods, bottles or teats not successfully intercepted\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of  donations of BMS, complementary foods, bottles or teats not successfully intercepted","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1494582815","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2098","label":"Code violations","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-092","code":"N-092","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of recorded Code violations\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of recorded Code violations","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1494582800","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2022","label":"Proportion of mothers relactated","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-078","code":"N-078","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of mothers who successfully relactated\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"Total number of mothers who received relactation support","numerator":"Number of mothers who successfully relactated","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871912","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":"Need to define criteria for \u0026quot;successful\u0026quot; relactation"},{"id":"2023","label":"BSFPs coverage","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-064","code":"N-064","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of target beneficiaries enrolled in blanket supplementary feeding programme\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of beneficiaries meeting the selection criteria for the blanket supplementary feeding programme","numerator":"Number of target beneficiaries meeting the selection criteria for the blanket supplementary feeding programme enrolled","disaggregation":"Geographical area, rural\/urban\/IDPs, sex, group of beneficiaries based on national criteria","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871720","data_sources":"BSFP management reporting and coverage survey","general_guidance":"The total number of children admitted will be based on the target set (the estimated burden of malnutrition x the total number of children who can be reached).  This can be over a specified time period.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"N\/A","comments":""},{"id":"2106","label":"IYCF coordinating body","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-108","code":"N-108","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA lead coordinating body on IYCF is designated\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872326","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All phases","response":"No","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Yes","comments":""},{"id":"2091","label":"Calcium supplementation in pregnant women","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-075","code":"N-075","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of pregnant women who received calcium supplements during their last pregnancy\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of pregnant women eligible to receive calcium supplements during their last pregnancy","numerator":"Number of pregnant women who received calcium supplements during their last pregnancy","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age group, pregnancy status","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871875","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Where a survey has been done, these data should be utilized, otherwise administrative or facility level data can be utilized, however a caution should be paid that denominator of this coverage utilizes estimated number of people that meets criteria for supplementation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"","comments":"In populations where calcium intake is low, calcium supplementation is recommended for the prevention of pre-eclampsia among pregnant women, particularly those at higher risk of hypertension. Calcium for pregnant women http:\/\/www.who.int\/nutrition\/publications\/micronutrients\/guidelines\/calcium_supplementation\/en\/index.html)"},{"id":"2090","label":"Prophylactic zinc supplementation in children coverage","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-074","code":"N-074","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of  children received prophylactic zinc supplements according to national  protocols\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of  children eligible to receive prophylactic zinc supplements according to national  protocols","numerator":"Number of  children received prophylactic zinc supplements according to national  protocols","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, age group","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871862","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"Only applicable for countries where zinc supplementation for prophylaxis is a policy","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2089","label":"Zinc utilization for diarrhoea treatment","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-073","code":"N-073","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of non-SAM children with diarrhoea treated with ORS supplemented with zinc\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of non-SAM children with diarrhoea treated","numerator":"Number of non-SAM children with diarrhoea treated with ORS supplemented with zinc","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871850","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2088","label":"Micronutrient  knowledge (in-depth)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-072","code":"N-072","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of target population who knows key elements of the nutrition messages provided on availability, use and benefits of micronutrient supplements or micronutrient rich or fortified foods\/ food supplements\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated total number of target population that meets selection criteria","numerator":"Number of target population that meets selection criteria who know key elements of the nutrition messages provided on availability, use and benefits of micronutrient supplements or micronutrient rich or fortified foods\/ food supplements","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, age group","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871838","data_sources":"Survey","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"target - 85%","comments":"Attention should be paid on how mothers\/fathers, women\/men are equally knowledgeable about micronutrients. It is important to ensure that target group consists of both males and females."},{"id":"2087","label":"Multiple micronutrients coverage","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-071","code":"N-071","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of target population that received multiple micronutrient  powder\/capsules\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated total number of target population that meets selection criteria","numerator":"Number of target population that received multiple micronutrient  powder\/capsules","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, age group","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871826","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Countries or affected areas may choose to modify the age group to 6-23 months or 6-36 months depending on needs. Where a survey has been done, these data should be utilized, otherwise administrative or facility level data can be utilised, however a caution should be paid that denominator of this coverage utilizes estimated number of people that meets criteria for supplementation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"","comments":"Capsules are used for PLW supplementation and powders are used for children"},{"id":"2086","label":"Deworming coverage in pregnant women","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-070","code":"N-070","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of mothers of children 0-59 months of age who took deworming medication during the last pregnancy.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated total number of  mothers of children 0-59 months of age","numerator":"Number of mothers of children 0-59 months of age who took deworming medication during the last pregnancy","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871815","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Where a survey has been done, these data should be utilized, otherwise administrative or facility level data can be utilised, however a caution should be paid that denominator of this coverage utilizes estimated number of people that meets criteria for supplementation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2085","label":"Deworming coverage in adolescents","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-069","code":"N-069","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of adolescent girls who received deworming medication in the previous 6 months\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated total number of adolescent girls","numerator":"Number of  adolescent girls who received deworming medication in the previous 6 months","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871803","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Where a survey has been done, these data should be utilized, otherwise administrative or facility level data can be utilized, however a caution should be paid that denominator of this coverage utilizes estimated number of people that meets criteria for supplementation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2083","label":"Women iodine supplementation coverage","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-067","code":"N-067","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of women of child-bearing age who received iodine supplements\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated total number of women of child-bearing age","numerator":"Number of women of child-bearing age who received iodine supplements","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age group","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871775","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Where a survey has been done, these data should be utilized, otherwise administrative or facility level data can be utilized, however a caution should be paid that denominator of this coverage utilizes estimated number of people that meets criteria for supplementation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"","comments":"Iodine supplements for women and\/or children according to guideline (http:\/\/www.who.int\/nutrition\/publications\/micronutrients\/WHOStatement__IDD_pregnancy.pdf). "},{"id":"2082","label":"Iron-folic acid supplementation coverage  in adolescent girls","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-066","code":"N-066","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of adolescent girls receiving micronutrient supplements that contain adequate iron\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated total number of adolescent girls who meet target criteria for iron-folic acid supplementation","numerator":"Number of adolescent girls who received micronutrient supplements with adequate iron-folic acid in\/with one of their meals the previous day","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871763","data_sources":"Population survey with representative sampling methods (eg, MICS, DHA, SMART)","general_guidance":"Where a survey has been done, these data should be utilized, otherwise administrative or facility level data can be utilized, however a caution should be paid that denominator of this coverage utilizes estimated number of people that meets criteria for supplementation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2081","label":"Children Screened","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-065","code":"N-065","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of children screened for acute malnutrition in a community\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of children screened for acute malnutrition in a community","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, rural\/urban\/IDP, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, PLW, other groups","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871730","data_sources":"SAM and MAM management reports at district or higher level","general_guidance":"This can be calculated through a coverage survey or using a proxy indicator from the reporting system","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"N\/A","comments":""},{"id":"2103","label":"Knowledge of good nutrition\/IYCF practices","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-105","code":"N-105","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of target population disaggregated by sex who have increased knowledge of good nutrition\/IYCF practices at the end of the project\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of men and total number of women participated in the project","numerator":"Number of men\/women who have increased knowledge of good nutrition practices at the end of the project","disaggregation":"Geographical area, response domain","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872281","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phases  III, IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Target - 100%","comments":""},{"id":"2093","label":"Breastfeeding support inclusion","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-077","code":"N-077","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes that includes support of breastfeeding mothers as a specific programme component\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of programmes","numerator":"Number of programmes where breastfeeding mothers receive support as a specific component","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871900","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2105","label":"IYCF-E Capacity","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-110","code":"N-110","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of emergency-affected areas that have an adequate number of skilled IYCF counsellors and\/or functioning support groups\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of emergency-affected areas","numerator":"Number of emergency-affected areas that have an adequate number of skilled IYCF counsellors and\/or functioning support groups","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872366","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2104","label":"Men participation in nutrition programmes","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-106","code":"N-106","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of men participated in nutritional education programmes\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of people participated in nutritional education programmes","numerator":"Number of men participated in nutritional education programmes","disaggregation":"Geographical area, response domain","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872296","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phases II, III, IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2102","label":"Single sex consultations on effective response","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-103","code":"N-103","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of partners routinely conducting single sex consultations to discuss about how effectively they respond to distinct nutritional needs of the affected population and to address any challenges in accessing assistance\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of partners responding to the emergency","numerator":"Number of partners routinely conducting single sex consultations to discuss about how effectively they respond to distinct nutritional needs of the affected population and to address any challenges in accessing assistance","disaggregation":"Response domain","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872257","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phases  III, IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Target - 100%","comments":""},{"id":"2101","label":"Focus group discussions","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-102","code":"N-102","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of nutrition programmes that had separate focus group discussions with affected girls, women, boys and men during assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of nutrition programmes","numerator":"Number of nutrition programmes that had separate focus group discussions with affected girls, women, boys and men during assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, age, phase of project (assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation), response domain","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872241","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All phases","response":"No","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Target - 100%","comments":""},{"id":"2099","label":"Donations intercepted","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-093","code":"N-093","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of donations of BMS, complementary foods, bottles or teats successfully intercepted\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of donations of BMS, complementary foods, bottles or teats successfully intercepted","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1494582808","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2097","label":"BMS distribution","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-091","code":"N-091","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where BMS are distributed as part of the food aid distribution\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of programmes where BMS are distributed","numerator":"Number of programmes where BMS are distributed as part of food aid","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872096","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2096","label":"Preparation BMS education","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-083","code":"N-083","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where education and practical training on safe preparation of BMS for caregivers is included\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of programmes where BMS are distributed","numerator":"Number of programmes where education and practical training for caregivers on safe preparation od BMS is included","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871993","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery, W1 Hygiene Promotion","threshold":"","comments":"Should be targeted to caregivers or children that will receive BMS (avoid spill over effect)"},{"id":"2084","label":"Deworming coverage in children","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-068","code":"N-068","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 12-59 months who received deworming medication in the previous 6 months\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated total number of children 12-59 months","numerator":"Number of children 12-59 months who received deworming medication in the previous 6 months","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871791","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Where a survey has been done, these data should be utilized, otherwise administrative or facility level data can be utilized, however a caution should be paid that denominator of this coverage utilizes estimated number of people that meets criteria for supplementation. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2095","label":"Proportion of FBF","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-080","code":"N-080","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6-23 months received fortified blended foods\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of children 6-23 months","numerator":"Number of children 6-23 months received fortified blended foods","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871952","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2094","label":"Consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-079","code":"N-079","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6-23 months of age who receive an iron-rich food or iron-fortified food that is specially designed for infants and young children, or that is fortified in the home.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of children 6-23 months","numerator":"Number of children 6-23 months who receive an iron-rich food or iron fortified food","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871933","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2092","label":"Access to breastfeeding corners ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-076","code":"N-076","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of breastfeeding mothers of children 0-2 years with access to breastfeeding corners\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of breastfeeding mothers of children 0-2 years of age","numerator":"Number of breastfeeding mothers of children 0-2 years of age with access to breastfeeding corners","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871888","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P5 Vulnerability, S1.2 Assistance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2024","label":"BMS follow up","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-084","code":"N-084","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where there is follow-up of BMS recipients, both at distribution point and at household level\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of programmes with BMS distribution","numerator":"Number of programmes where there is follow-up of BMS recipients at distribution point and at household level","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872005","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2107","label":"IYCF policy","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-107","code":"N-107","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA national and\/or agency policy is in place that addresses IYCF and reflects the Operational Guidance on IFE\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"N\/A","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872311","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All phases","response":"No","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Yes","comments":""},{"id":"2031","label":"BMS targeting","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-082","code":"N-082","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where BMS are appropriately targeted, based on qualified assessment and governed by accepted criteria\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of programmes where BMS are provided","numerator":"Number of programmes where BMS are appropriately targeted","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424871976","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2030","label":"Baby bottles or teats distribution","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-090","code":"N-090","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where baby bottles or teats are being used and\/or distributed as feeding utensils?\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of programmes where BMS are distributed","numerator":"Number of programmes where baby bottles or teats are being used or distributed","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1494582791","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2029","label":"Infants in need of BMS","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-089","code":"N-089","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children admitted to programme who are in  need of BMS\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"Total number of children admitted to programme","numerator":"Number of children admitted to programme who are in need of BMS","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872066","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phases I, II, III, IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2028","label":"Admissions with BMS","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-088","code":"N-088","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children who were already on BMS when admitted to the programme\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"Total number of children admitted to programme","numerator":"Number of children admitted to programme who were already BMS","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1494582783","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phases I, II, III, IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"target: 100%","comments":""},{"id":"2027","label":"No secure supply of BMS","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-087","code":"N-087","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where a secure supply of BMS been HAS NOT been established\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of programmes where BMS are distributed","numerator":"Number of programmes where a secure supply of BMS have not been established","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872037","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2026","label":"BMS shelf life","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-086","code":"N-086","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where distributed BMS DOES NOT have a shelf-life of at least six months\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Number of programs where BMS are provided","numerator":"Number of programs where BMS does not have a shelf life of at least six months","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872026","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2025","label":"BMS labelling language","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-085","code":"N-085","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of programmes where BMS used labelled in an appropriate language\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of programmes where BMS are used","numerator":"Number of programmes where BMS used are labelled in an appropriate language","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248745","changed":"1424872015","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2011","label":"Access to MAM services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-063","code":"N-063","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"Proportion of the moderate acute malnutrition target population living within less than one day\u0027s return walk from management of MAM site \n","unit":"Percentage\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"Estimated MAM target population (based on the prevalence of MAM in the area)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of the moderate acute malnutrition target population living within less than one day\u0026#039;s return walk from management of moderate acute or malnutrition site\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geographical area, rural\/urban, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, other groups\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248736","changed":"1424871707","data_sources":"MAM management reporting and SQUEAC survey\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"This can be calculated through a coverage survey or using a proxy indicator from the reporting system\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"SPHERE: More than 90 per cent of the target population is within less than one day\u2019s return walk (including time for treatment) of the programme site.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":""},{"id":"2006","label":" MAM currently treated","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-055","code":"N-055","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of cases with moderate acute malnutrition receiving treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition receiving treatment","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871522","data_sources":"MAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"N\/A","comments":""},{"id":"2010","label":"MAM treatment coverage","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-056","code":"N-056","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of cases with moderate acute malnutrition receiving treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition","numerator":"Number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition receiving for treatment","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871534","data_sources":"SQUEAC survey","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"geographical area or impact area: Sphere Minimum Standards:  \u0026gt;50% for rural; \u0026gt;70% for urban; \u0026gt;90% for camps\u0026quot;","comments":""},{"id":"2009","label":"MAM discharged defaulted","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-059","code":"N-059","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of discharged cases with moderate acute malnutrition who defaulted\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of discharged cases with moderate acute malnutrition who defaulted","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5, children 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years old and older, other groups, confirmed\/non-confirmed","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871589","data_sources":"MAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Sphere Standards:  should be less than 15%","comments":"Where possible, it can be useful to break this indicator down to confirmed and non confirmed defaulters as defaulters can mask high death rates if not confirmed.  This can be an optional category where capacity to trace defaulters is limited "},{"id":"2008","label":"MAM follow-up","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-062","code":"N-062","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of moderate acute malnutrition problem cases receiving treatment in need for follow-up at home who are visited at home\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of moderate acute malnutrition problem cases receiving treatment in need for follow-up at home","numerator":"Number of moderate acute malnutrition problem cases receiving treatment in need for follow-up at home who are visited at home","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, other groups","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871633","data_sources":"MAM management reporting and SQUEAC survey","general_guidance":"This can be calculated through a coverage survey or using a proxy indicator from the reporting system","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2007","label":"MAM discharged recovered","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-058","code":"N-058","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of discharged cases with moderate acute malnutrition who  recovered\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of discharged cases with moderate acute malnutrition who  recovered","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 0-59 months, 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years and older, other groups, inpatient\/outpatient\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871575","data_sources":"MAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Sphere Standards: should be more than 75%","comments":""},{"id":"2078","label":" MAM new admissions","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-054","code":"N-054","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of cases with moderate acute malnutrition newly admitted for treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition newly admitted for treatment","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871510","data_sources":"MAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"N\/A","comments":""},{"id":"2079","label":"MAM discharged died","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-057","code":"N-057","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of cases with moderate acute malnutrition who died during treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition who died during treatment","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871558","data_sources":"MAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"Sphere Standards:  should be less than 3%","comments":""},{"id":"2005","label":"MAM discharged non-recovered","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-060","code":"N-060","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of discharged cases with moderate acute malnutrition who non-recovered\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of discharged cases with moderate acute malnutrition who non-recovered","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 0-59 months, 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years and older, other groups, inpatient\/outpatient\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871600","data_sources":"MAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2080","label":"MAM referred","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-061","code":"N-061","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of cases with moderate acute malnutrition referred for treatment of severe acute malnutrition, to inpatient care or hospital\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of cases with moderate acute malnutrition referred to inpatient care or hospital","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years and older, other groups","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248546","changed":"1424871612","data_sources":"MAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2004","label":"Access to SAM services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-053","code":"N-053","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"Proportion of the severe acute malnutrition target population living within less than one day\u0027s return walk from management of SAM site \n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Estimated SAM target population (based on the prevalence of SAM in the area)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of the severe acute malnutrition target population living within less than one day\u0026#039;s return walk from management of severe acute malnutrition site\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geographical area, rural\/urban, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, other groups\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248524","changed":"1424871496","data_sources":" SQUEAC survey\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"This can be calculated through a coverage survey or using a proxy indicator from the reporting system\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"SPHERE: More than 90 per cent of the target population is within less than one day\u2019s return walk (including time for treatment) of the programme site.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"Management includes: detection, diagnosis, triage, treatment, follow-up at health facility and\/or home for treatment progress, prevention of adverse effects, rehabilitation\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2002","label":"SAM follow-up","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-052","code":"N-052","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of severe acute malnutrition problem cases receiving treatment in need for follow-up at home who are visited at home\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of severe acute malnutrition problem cases receiving treatment in need for follow-up at home","numerator":"Number of severe acute malnutrition problem cases receiving treatment in need for follow-up at home who are visited at home","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, other groups","key":"No","types":"Process","created":"1393248345","changed":"1424871485","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"This can be calculated through a coverage survey or using a proxy indicator from the reporting system","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"Example of SAM problem cases: defaulting, non-response to treatment, refusal referral. Each programme will define which cases are problem ones and should be followed up at home."},{"id":"2003","label":"SAM average length of stay","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-051","code":"N-051","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAverage duration of SAM treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"days","denominator":"Number of beneficiaries","numerator":"Sum of lengths of stay for beneficiaries in therapeutic treatment programme (in days)","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, PLW, people 60 years old and older,  other groups","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248345","changed":"1424871468","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"Average Length Of Stay is calculated on a randomized sample of cured discharges for kwashiorkor and marasmus. A reasonable randomized sample of discharged cured cases is 20. If lower numbers have been discharged cured during the period of reporting, take all discharged cured.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"According to guidelines in use","comments":"Guidelines define limits for the mean length of stay for treatment and are aimed at avoiding prolonged recovery periods. Mean length of stay will differ depending on the guidelines in use and so should be adjusted to national context and guidelines in use. (SPHERE)"},{"id":"2001","label":"SAM average weight gain","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-050","code":"N-050","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"Average weight gain for cases with severe acute malnutrition receiving treatment \n","unit":"gram weight gain per kilogram of body mass per day\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"\u0026quot;Calculating weight gain :\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThe example is for weight gain over 7 days, but the same procedure can be applied to any interval:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n* subtract from today\u2019s weight (in g) the child\u2019s weight 7 days earlier ;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n* divide by 7 to determine the average daily weight gain (g\/day) ;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n* divide by the child\u2019s average weight in kg to calculate the weight gain as g\/kg\/da\u0026quot;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"\u0026quot;Calculating weight gain :\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThe example is for weight gain over 7 days, but the same procedure can be applied to any interval:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n* subtract from today\u2019s weight (in g) the child\u2019s weight 7 days earlier ;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n* divide by 7 to determine the average daily weight gain (g\/day) ;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n* divide by the child\u2019s average weight in kg to calculate the weight gain as g\/kg\/da\u0026quot;\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, people 60 years old and older, other groups\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1393248328","changed":"1424871456","data_sources":"SAM management reporting\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"Average Daily Weight Gain is calculated on a randomized sample of cured discharges for kwashiorkor and marasmus. A reasonable randomized sample of discharged cured cases is 20. If lower numbers have been discharged cured during the period of reporting, take all discharged cured. See Guidelines for the inpatient treatment of severely malnourished children, WHO 2003\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"poor \u0026lt;5 g\/kg\/d,  moderate 5-10 g\/kg\/d, good \u0026gt;10 g\/kg\/d\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":""},{"id":"2064","label":"Bottle feeding","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-034","code":"N-034","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 0-23 months of age who are fed with a bottle\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of infants 0-23 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of infants 0-23 months who are fed with a bottle","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871077","data_sources":"Preparatory, Phase III and IV: representative IYCF survey. Phase I and II  use key informant interviews and opportunistic sampling to give an ALERT indication","general_guidance":" WHO IYCF optional indicator. This indicator determines the use of bottles which carry risk;  is not an indicator of use of infant formula or breast milk substitutes, since it records any item fed using a bottle including breast milk, water, semi-solids, etc.). ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                                          Phases I, II,  III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2068","label":"Introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft food ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-038","code":"N-038","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6-8 months of age who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods during the previous day\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of infants 5-8 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of infants 5-8 months who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods during the previous day","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871134","data_sources":"representative IYCF survey","general_guidance":" WHO IYCF core indicator. Need guidance on sample size","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                                          Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group","comments":""},{"id":"2065","label":"Minimum dietary diversity","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-035","code":"N-035","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6-23 months of age who receive foods from 4 or more food groups\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 6-23 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children 6-23 months who receive food from 4 or more food groups","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871094","data_sources":"representative IYCF survey","general_guidance":"This indicator is adapted from the WHO IYCF core indicator for children 6-23 months.  ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                                          Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group","comments":"Data  should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific limitation girls or boys might face in accessing dietary diversity. In case there is an important difference, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs (i.e. food taboos) that might differently impact on girls\u0026#039; and boys\u0026#039; dietary diversity."},{"id":"2066","label":"Minimum meal frequency","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-036","code":"N-036","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6-23 months who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods the minimum number of times or more.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 6-23 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children 6-23 months who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods for the minimum number of times or more","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871107","data_sources":"representative IYCF survey","general_guidance":" WHO IYCF core indicator","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                                          Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group","comments":""},{"id":"2067","label":"Minimum acceptable diet","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-037","code":"N-037","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6-23 months of age who receive a minimum acceptable diet (apart from breast milk)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 6-23 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children 6-23 months who receive a minimum acceptable diet","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871122","data_sources":"representative IYCF survey","general_guidance":" WHO IYCF core indicator","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                                          Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group","comments":""},{"id":"2069","label":"Not breastfed","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-039","code":"N-039","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of infants 0\u0026lt;12 months and 12\u0026lt;24 months not breastfed\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 0\u0026lt;12 months and 12\u0026lt;24 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of infants 0-12 months and 12-24 months not breastfed","disaggregation":"Geographical area; 0-\u0026lt;12 months, 12-\u0026lt;24 months, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871158","data_sources":"Preparatory, Phases 111 and IV: Indicator produced from data collected  from MICS\/DHS.  Phase I and II will use key informant interviews and opportunistic sampling to give an ALERT indication.","general_guidance":"This is not a standard indicator. However it is possible to calculate this indicator using standardized data collected to produce  WHO IYCF core indicators.  ","guidance_baseline":"Preparatory: calculate this indicator based on standardized data collected. In phases 1 and 11, an indication of the proportion of non-breastfed infants should be estimated based on key informant interviews and opportunistic sampling.","guidance_phases":"Calculate this indicator based on standardized data collected. In phases 1 and 2, an indication of the proportion of non-breastfed infants should be estimated based on key informant interviews and opportunistic sampling.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":"Need to raise this with WHO to see how we might develop this as a standard indicator to report in emergency prone contexts."},{"id":"2071","label":"Inappropriate distribution of infant formula, dried or liquid milk to children 0-\u0026lt;2 years","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-041","code":"N-041","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EConfirmed distribution of infant formula, dried or liquid milk to children 0-\u0026lt; 2 years\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871208","data_sources":"Key informant interviews (include logistics and any agencies involved in distribution, as well as health and nutrition staff and caregivers).  Distribution reports. Observations.","general_guidance":"This is an alert to problems. Inappropriate distribution is where distribution is not in accordance with the Operational Guidance on IFE in meeting criteria for assessment of need, skilled support available, guaranteed continuity of supplies,   individual follow up, availability of storage and preparation facilities, appropriate labelling, and monitoring for spill over to breastfed infants. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":" Phases I,II,III and IV.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"zero tolerance","comments":""},{"id":"2075","label":"SAM discharged died","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-045","code":"N-045","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of cases with severe acute malnutrition who died during treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with severe acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of cases with severe acute malnutrition who died during treatment ","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871366","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"Sphere Standards:  should be less than 10%","comments":""},{"id":"2070","label":"Distribution of infant formula, dried or liquid milk to the affected population","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-040","code":"N-040","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EConfirmed distribution of infant formula, dried or liquid milk to the affected population\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Yes\/No","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871185","data_sources":"Key informant interviews (include logistics and any agencies involved in distribution, as well as health and nutrition staff and caregivers).  Distribution reports. Observations.","general_guidance":"This is an alert to problems. Any general distribution of these products to the affected population is a concern as there is a risk of spill over to infants and young children.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":" Phases I,II, III and IV.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"zero tolerance","comments":""},{"id":"2073","label":" SAM currently treated","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-043","code":"N-043","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of cases with severe acute malnutrition receiving treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of cases with severe acute malnutrition receiving treatment","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Process","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871339","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"The total number of children admitted will be based on the target set (the estimated burden of malnutrition x the total number of children who can be reached).  This can be over a specified time period.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"We recognize that PLW with SAM are missing from this disaggregation, however this is work in progress to define case definitions. The reporting period is usually monthly, in major emergencies the reporting can be weekly, bi-weekly.  Admission rates should be analysed in order to identify if boys, girls, men, women are equally accessing nutrition services. If a group identified as potentially vulnerable, is not oriented to the nutrition centres, it is important to understand why this is (i.e. gender-based discrimination, mobility restrictions, etc.) and to take required actions."},{"id":"2074","label":"SAM treatment coverage","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-044","code":"N-044","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of cases with severe acute malnutrition receiving treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with severe acute malnutrition","numerator":"Number of cases with severe acute malnutrition receiving for treatment","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871352","data_sources":"SQUEAC surveys","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"Sphere Minimum Standards:  \u0026gt;50% for rural; \u0026gt;70% for urban; \u0026gt;90% for IDPs\u0026quot;","comments":"Definitions of different types of coverage are being developed.  Admission rates should be analysed in order to identify if boys, girls, men, women are equally accessing nutrition services. If a group identified as potentially vulnerable, is not oriented to the nutrition centres, it is important to understand why this is (i.e. gender-based discrimination, mobility restrictions, etc.) and to take required actions."},{"id":"1999","label":"SAM discharged recovered","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-046","code":"N-046","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of discharged cases with severe acute malnutrition who  recovered\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with severe acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of discharged cases with severe acute malnutrition who  recovered","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 0-59 months, 6-59 months,  people 60 years and older, other groups, inpatient\/outpatient\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871379","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Sphere Standards:  should be more than 75%","comments":""},{"id":"2072","label":" SAM new admissions","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-042","code":"N-042","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of cases with severe acute malnutrition newly admitted for treatment\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of cases with severe acute malnutrition newly admitted for treatment","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5 months, children 6-59 months, people 60 years of age and older, inpatient\/outpatient, rural\/urban\/IDPs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n ","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871316","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"The total number of newly admitted children should be based on the aggregate monthly admissions data.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"N\/A","comments":"We recognize that PLW with SAM are missing from this disaggregation, however this is work in progress to define case definitions. The reporting period is usually monthly, in major emergencies the reporting can be weekly, bi-weekly. Admission rates should be analysed in order to identify if boys, girls, men, women are equally accessing nutrition services. If a group identified as potentially vulnerable, is not oriented to the nutrition centres, it is important to understand why this is (i.e. gender-based discrimination, mobility restrictions, etc.) and to take required actions."},{"id":"2000","label":"SAM discharged defaulted","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-047","code":"N-047","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of discharged cases with severe acute malnutrition who defaulted\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with severe acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of discharged cases with severe acute malnutrition who defaulted","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: infants 0-5, children 6-59 months, people 60 years old and older, other groups, confirmed\/non-confirmed","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871403","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Sphere Standards:  should be less than 15%","comments":"Specify timing for defaulters. Unconfirmed defaulter includes defaulted, moved, died. . If you have capacity to confirm the reason for defaulting, correct  the relevant discharged indicators"},{"id":"2077","label":"SAM referred","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-049","code":"N-049","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of cases with severe acute malnutrition referred to inpatient care or hospital\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"Number of cases with severe acute malnutrition referred to inpatient care or hospital","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 6-59 months, people 60 years and older,  other groups","key":"No","types":"Output, Process","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871434","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care","threshold":"NA","comments":""},{"id":"2076","label":"SAM discharged non-recovered","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-048","code":"N-048","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of discharged cases with severe acute malnutrition who non-recovered\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of cases with severe acute malnutrition discharged","numerator":"Number of discharged cases with severe acute malnutrition who non-recovered","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, group of beneficiaries: children 0-59 months, 6-59 months,  people 60 years and older, other groups, inpatient\/outpatient\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"No","types":"Output, Process","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871416","data_sources":"SAM management reporting","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health","threshold":"NA","comments":"Specify timing for non-recovery. Non-response to treatment should be identified and acted upon with the full medical investigation."},{"id":"2063","label":"Predominant breastfeeding under 6 months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-033","code":"N-033","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of infants 0-5 months of age who are predominantly breastfed\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of infants 0 to 5 months of age surveyed","numerator":"Number of infants 0-5 months of age who are predominantly breastfed","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline","created":"1393248182","changed":"1424871060","data_sources":"representative IYCF survey","general_guidance":" WHO IYCF optional indicator","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                                          Phase III and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group","comments":"Attention should be paid on the potential difference in breastfeeding male and female infants. If difference exists, this should inform the nutritional education messages."},{"id":"2062","label":"Children ever breastfed","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-032","code":"N-032","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children born in the last 24 months who were ever breastfed\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of infants born in the past 23 months in the surveyed area","numerator":"Number of infants 0-23 months of age who ever received breast milk","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248122","changed":"1424871043","data_sources":"Preparatory, Phase III and IV: representative IYCF survey. Phase I and II: use key informant interviews and opportunistic sampling to give an ALERT indication","general_guidance":"WHO IYCF core indicator.  ","guidance_baseline":"For preparatory phase, the core WHO Indicator should be used as a baseline where the denominator is infants born in the last 24 months. ","guidance_phases":"For measurement in Phases 1-IV, an adapted indicator should be used where the denominator should be infants born since onset of the emergency.    In phases 1 and 2, opportunistic sampling will be necessary, e.g. piggy backed onto reproductive health sampling or anthropometric screening or food security assessment.    ","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group","comments":""},{"id":"2061","label":"Continued breastfeeding at one year and at 2 years","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-031","code":"N-031","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 12-15 months of age and 20-23 months of age who are fed breast milk\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of infants 12-15 months of age and total number of infants 20-23 months of age surveyed","numerator":"Infants 12-15 months of age and 20-23 months of age who receive any breast milk","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248122","changed":"1424871025","data_sources":"representative IYCF survey","general_guidance":"The WHO IYCF core indicator reports continued breastfeeding at 1 year. In emergencies,  it is important to also monitor continued breastfeeding rate at 2 years (WHO IYCF optional indicator) as children 1-2 years are also  at significant risk of increased morbidity and mortality if not breastfed in this context. ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                                          Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":"Attention should be paid on the potential difference in breastfeeding male and female infants. If difference exists, this should inform the nutritional education messages."},{"id":"2060","label":"Exclusive breastfeeding under 6 months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-030","code":"N-030","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of infants 0-5 months of age who are fed exclusively with breast milk\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of infants 0 to 5 months of age surveyed","numerator":"Infants 0 to 5 months of age who received only breast milk during the previous day","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex, age: 0-1, 2-3, 4-5 months if available","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393248122","changed":"1424871010","data_sources":"Preparatory, Phase III and IV: representative IYCF survey. Phase I and II: use key informant interviews and opportunistic sampling to give an ALERT indication ","general_guidance":" WHO IYCF core indicator.","guidance_baseline":" For preparatory phase, core WHO indicator should be measured","guidance_phases":"For  Phases III and IV, core WHO indicator should be measured. In Phases 1 and 2, it is not possible to accurately assess the exclusive breastfeeding rate in the population. Baseline information  and N-40 (not breastfed) will  be key information in Phases I and II.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group","comments":"Attention should be paid on the potential difference in breastfeeding male and female infants. If difference exists, this should inform the nutritional education messages."},{"id":"2059","label":"Early initiation of breastfeeding","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-029","code":"N-029","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 0-23 months who were put to the breast within one hour of birth.\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Percentage \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"Total number of women with a live birth in the X years prior to the survey\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of women with a live birth in the X years prior to the survey who put the newborn infant to the breast within\u00a0one hour of birth\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"No","types":"Baseline","created":"1393248026","changed":"1424870965","data_sources":"Preparatory, Phase III and IV: representative IYCF survey. Phase I and II: use key informant interviews and opportunistic sampling to give an ALERT indication\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":" WHO IYCF core indicator.  \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"For preparatory phase, the WHO core indicator should be used as a baseline where the denominator is children born in the last 24 months (Proportion of children born in the last 24 months who were put to the breastfed within one hour of birth).\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_phases":"For Phases III-IV,  an adapted indicator should be used where the same methodology is used but the denominator is infants born since onset of the emergency. (Proportion of children born since the onset of the emergency who were put to the breastfed within one hour of birth).    In Phase 1 and 2, the denominator used should be infants born since onset of the emergency. In these phases opportunistic sampling will be necessary, e.g. at facilities providing obstetric services\/newborn support.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"No standard; \u0026lt; 80Proportion of is generally a priority. Discuss high, medium and low designations as a group\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"Note: DHS data are based on the three years or five years prior to survey and MICS data are based on the two years prior to survey\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2058","label":"Under-five mortality","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-028","code":"N-028","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe rate of death among children below of 5 years of age in the population\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"death per 10,000 children under 5 years\/day\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"Total number of children under 5 years multiple by number of days in time period over 10,000 persons\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Total number of death in children under 5 years during time period\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geographical area\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393247861","changed":"1424870937","data_sources":"Representative survey and or from health facility \/ community records\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"Under-five mortality rate as defined here is strictly speaking not a rate (i.e. the\u00a0number of deaths divided by the number of population at risk during a certain\u00a0period of time) but a probability of death derived from a life table and\u00a0expressed as rate per 1000 live births\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phases I, II  III and IV\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"See Sphere (http:\/\/www.spherehandbook.org\/en\/essential-health-services-standard-1-prioritising-health-services\/) for emergency thresholds for different regions. When the baseline rate is unknown or of doubtful validity, agencies should aim to maintain the U5MR at least below 2.0\/10,000\/day\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"These data should be taken from Health Cluster or specific mortality surveys, representative surveys, A proxy can be  calculated through health facilities and community records in early phases of emergency. Under-five mortality rate measures child survival. It also reflects the social, economic and environmental conditions in which children (and others in society) live, including their health care. Because data on the incidences and prevalence of diseases (morbidity data) frequently are unavailable, mortality rates are often used to identify vulnerable populations. Under-five mortality rate is an MDG indicator\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2057","label":"Child morbidity ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-027","code":"N-027","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 0-59 months whose caregiver reported an illness in the previous 2 weeks\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 0 to 59 months of age surveyed","numerator":"Number of children 0-59 months whose caregiver reported an illness in the previous 2 weeks","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393247632","changed":"1424870919","data_sources":"SMART surveys, Disease early warning systems","general_guidance":"survey data","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase I and II;                         Phase II and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H3 Communicable diseases, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"No threshold","comments":"This information may be available through the Health Cluster, but nutrition surveys may provide updated representative information"},{"id":"2056","label":"Prevalence rate of iodine deficiency","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-026","code":"N-026","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMedian urinary iodine concentration (?g\/L) in children aged 6-12 years\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children aged 6- 12 years surveyed\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Median urinary iodine concentration (?g\/L) in children aged 6-12 years\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393247609","changed":"1424870902","data_sources":"primary data - National Surveys, Local studies; secondary data - VMNIS\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"A median urinary iodine concentration in a population of \u0026lt; 100 ?g\/l indicates that the iodine intake is insufficient. A non-invasive method of measurement, the cost of spoturine samples tests is affordable. School age children 6-12 years can be easily tested in population-based surveys.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Preparatory\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F6 Availability, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"For children under-5, Public Health significance if \u0026lt;100\u00b5g\/l but I don\u0026#039;t know for children 6-12 years of age (ref:  WHO, UNICEF, ICCIDD 2007)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"WHO guideline: apps.who.int\/iris\/bitstream\/10665\/85972\/1\/WHO_NMH_NHD_EPG_13.1_eng.pdf; According to WHO ideally one should also assess PLW\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2055","label":"Prevalence rate of anaemia","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-025","code":"N-025","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children below five years of age with Hb concentration of \u0026lt;11 g\/dL                                  Proportion of women in reproductive age with Hb concentration of \u0026lt;12 g\/dL\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children below five years of age surveyed or Total number of women of reproductive age surveyed","numerator":"Number of children below five years of age with Hb concentration of \u0026lt;11 g\/dL or Number of women of reproductive age with  anaemia (Hb\u0026lt;11g\/dl for pregnant women; \u0026lt;12 g\/dl for non pregnant women)","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393246903","changed":"1424870889","data_sources":"primary data - National Surveys, Local studies, DHS, MICS; secondary data - VMNIS","general_guidance":"The finger-prick blood sample test is easy to administer in the field. The test could be easily integrated in regular health or prenatal visit to capture all women in reproductive ages. Cost of equipment may be prohibitive","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Preparatory","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"Public Health Significance: \u0026lt;4.9Proportion of Normal\/Adequate; 5-19.9Proportion of Low; 20-39.9Proportion of Medium; \u0026gt;40Proportion of High (ref:  WHO 2001).","comments":"WHO guideline: who.int\/indicators\/haemolobin.pdf; "},{"id":"2054","label":"Prevalence rate of vitamin A deficiency","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-024","code":"N-024","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003E(1)Proportion of children below five years of age with sub-clinical vitamin A deficiency (2) Proportion of women of reproductive age with clinical vitamin A deficiency\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children below five years of age surveyed or Total number of women of reproductive age surveyed\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of children below five years of age with vitamin A deficiency (serum retinol values \u0026lt;0.70\u00b5mol\/l) or Proportion of women of reproductive age or 15-49 years of age) with Vitamin A deficiency (serum retinol values\u0026lt;0.70\u00b5mol\/l)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geographical area, boys and girls 0-59 months, women of reproductive age\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393246877","changed":"1424870866","data_sources":"primary data - National Surveys, Local studies, DHS, MICS; secondary data - VMNIS\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":" FOR CHILDREN - Serum or plasma retinol levels measured in capillary or venous samples is an invasive test that is expensive if HPLC is used. Newer methods for dry blood spots with the capillary method are emerging. FOR WOMEN - Information can be ascertained verbally. Since the question is targeted at a specific subset of women, the indicator fails to capture the full range of women of reproductive ages. There is a need to standardize the phrasing of the question. \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Preparatory\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"No","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"Public Health Significance:  \u0026lt;2Proportion of normal; 2-9.9Proportion of Low; 10-19.9Proportion of Medium; \u0026gt;20Proportion of High (ref:  WHO 1996)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":"WHO guideline: who.int\/vmnis\/retinol.pdf\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2053","label":"Iodized salt consumption ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-023","code":"N-023","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion  households using adequately iodized salt in previous 6 months\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of households surveyed","numerator":"Number of households using adequately iodized salt (20-40 ppm) in previous 6 months","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393246628","changed":"1424870845","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Adequately iodized salt is salt containing 15 to 40 ppm of iodine at the household level. Reference: Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders and monitoring their elimination : a guide for programme managers. 3rd edition WHO, 2008","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F6 Availability, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"Indicator should be equal to or greater than 90Proportion of(reference?) -Number of households using adequately iodized salt (20-40 ppm) in previous 6 months","comments":"Use of  \u0026quot;using\u0026quot; rather than \u0026quot;having regularly consumed in previous 6 months\u0026quot; based on recommended assessment methods, which is measuring iodine level in salt in households at a time of assessment and not collecting retrospective data (as the level of iodine in salt consumed cannot be assessed and many people do not know if salt is \/ was iodized). Alternative formulation: \u0026quot;Proportion of households using adequately iodized salt\u0026quot; - see reference.        Apparently not a food security indicator; "},{"id":"2051","label":"Iron supplementation coverage rate in children ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-021","code":"N-021","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6-59 months of age receiving micronutrient supplements that contain adequate iron\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 6-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children 6-59 months who received micronutrient supplements with adequate iron in\/with one of their meals the previous day","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age (6-24,  24-59 months), sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393246519","changed":"1424870814","data_sources":"population surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2052","label":"Iron-folic acid supplementation in pregnant women","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-022","code":"N-022","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of pregnant women having received iron-folic acid contained supplementation daily in previous 6 months\/during pregnancy\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of pregnant women surveyed","numerator":"Number of pregnant women who bought or received iron-folic acid contained supplementation daily in the previous 6 months during pregnancy","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393246519","changed":"1424870830","data_sources":"Population survey with representative sampling methods (eg, MICS, DHA, SMART)","general_guidance":"In some countries iron-folic acid supplements are replaced by multiple micronutrients, therefore depending on the situation the indicator should be changed to \u0026quot;received iron-folic acid supplements \u0026quot;or \u0026quot;received multiple micronutrient supplements\u0026quot;","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F6 Availability, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2050","label":"Vitamin A coverage in children 6--59 months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-020","code":"N-020","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 6 - 59 months having received vitamin A in previous 6 months\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"Total number of children 6-59 months surveyed\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Number of children 6 - 59 months that received vitamin A in the previous 6 months (mother\u0026#039;s recall or card verified)","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age (6-11, 12-23 months), sex\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1393246490","changed":"1424870763","data_sources":"population surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health","threshold":"Target: 95%. Upon completion of measles vaccination campaign  at least 95 per cent of children aged 6\u201359 months have received an appropriate dose of Vitamin A","comments":"The indicator applies for children living in settings where VAD is a public health problem, WHO follows the GAVA recommendation and advocates for two doses in the last year. In case there is an important difference, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs that might differently impact on girls\u0026#039; and boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being. Consider the  dates of the actual vitamin A supplementation to get an indication of number of children uncovered (0 to 5 months old) and who should be included in the new supplementation programme.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n"},{"id":"2049","label":"Level of risk to common micronutrient deficiencies (high, medium, low)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-019","code":"N-019","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EQualitative assessment of nutritional risk of common micronutrient deficiencies (anaemia, iodine deficiency, vitamin A deficiency (night blindness), scurvy, beri beri, vitamin D deficiency) based on composite indicator analysis on prevalence rates, diet analysis, water quality and diarrheal disease, case finding\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"high, medium, low","denominator":"N\/A","numerator":"N\/A","disaggregation":"By deficiency; geographical area, sex, potentially vulnerable groups: PLW, children 6-59 months, other potentially vulnerable groups","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1393245226","changed":"1494575767","data_sources":"use survey data ;                                 estimate from numbers of affected population by type of vulnerable groups","general_guidance":"List prevalence rates for micronutrient status known for any vitamins and minerals and collect additional information on diet, water quality and disease, to assess the severity of the risk for specific population groups","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Preparatory;                               Phase II, III, IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, (R) Early Recovery, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"SPHERE 2011, appendix 5 - thresholds (http:\/\/www.spherehandbook.org\/en\/appendix-15\/)","comments":""},{"id":"2048","label":"Minimum dietary diversity for children 24-59  months ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-018","code":"N-018","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of children 24-59 months who receive foods from 4 or more food groups\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 24-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children 24-59 months who receive from 4 or more of the following food groups.","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline","created":"1393245226","changed":"1424870721","data_sources":"surveys;                   rapid assessments;                 ","general_guidance":"Use 6-23 months  age group indicator as proxy for 24-59 months, and assume older age group is worse off - CAN be an important ALERT indicator in early phases of an emergency (WHO uses a parameter of previous 24 hours). Food groups defined as follows: (1) grains, roots and tubers (2) legumes and nuts (3) dairy products (milk, yogurt, cheese) (4) flesh foods (meat, fish, poultry and liver\/organ meats) (5) eggs (6) vitamin-A rich fruits and vegetables (7) other fruits and vegetables","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase I and II;                         Phase II and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"No standard identified, only WHO source indicator","comments":"Indicator used for IYCF for 6-23 month age group based on WHO indicator"},{"id":"2044","label":"Undernutrition for adults","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-013","code":"N-013","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of adults aged 19.1 to 59.9 years old with BMI less than 17.00 kg\/m2 and\/or having bilateral pitting oedema\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of adults aged 19.1 to 59.9 years old surveyed","numerator":"Number of adults aged 19.1 to 59.9 years old  that meet the criteria for undernutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424870572","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Preparatory and phase IV and beyond ","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H3 Communicable diseases, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"WHO TRS 854 classification: mild thinness (BMI = 17.00-18.49 kg\/m2), moderate thinness  (BMI = 16.00-16.99 kg\/m2), and severe thinness  (BMI \u0026lt; 16.00 kg\/m2).","comments":"Anthropometric data should be interpreted with a contextual analysis of the associated nutritional risks for the population using underlying causes. In particular, data on the undernutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination adult women or adult men might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of women and the percentage of men suffering from undernutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs that might differently impact their nutritional well being."},{"id":"2038","label":"Childhood stunting","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-007","code":"N-007","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of stunting in children 0 to 59 months of age based on height-for-age z-score less than -2 standard deviations of the median of the standard population (WHO 2006)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 0 to 59 months of age surveyed","numerator":"Number of children 0 to 59 months of age that meet the criteria for stunting","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424861170","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"Aim should be to assess stunting in the entire age group 0-59 months","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"WHO TRS 854. Severity classification: 20,30,40 %","comments":"Disaggregation by sex and age group should be aimed for and results should be analysed.  Note: if surveys being undertaken include 0-59 then use this age group - if not - and the survey is including 6-59 then we may use 6-59. Ideally the Proportion of should be adjusted for 0-59 months)"},{"id":"2047","label":"Minimum meal frequency  for children 24-59  months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-016","code":"N-016","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EProportion of  children 24-59 months  who are eating 3 meals a day or more\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children 24-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of  children 24-59 months  who are eating 3 meals a day or more","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424870661","data_sources":"surveys;                   rapid assessments;                 ","general_guidance":"Use 6-23 months  age group indicator as proxy for 24-59 months, and assume older age group is worse off CAN be an important ALERT indicator in early phases of an emergency ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase I and II;                         Phase II and IV","response":"No","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care","threshold":"","comments":"Indicator used for IYCF for 6-23 month age group based on WHO indicator. "},{"id":"2046","label":"Acute malnutrition for older people","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-015","code":"N-015","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of older people with a MUAC below 210mm or having  bilateral pitting oedema\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of older people surveyed ","numerator":"Number of older people that meet the criteria for acute malnutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex: in preparatory, Phase III and IV, disaggregate by severity (\u0026lt;185mm and between 185 and 209mm)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424870635","data_sources":"surveys: rapid assessments","general_guidance":"Rapid assessment methods can be used at any phase.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nThe questionnaire should include questions about socio-economic status, health, household food security, water and sanitation.","guidance_baseline":"In preparatory phase,:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nCollect baseline demographic data about the percentage of people 50 and above (or 60 and above) disaggregated by sex and by age groups of 5 years (50-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-80, 80 and above)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nAssess household food security\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nOrganize focus group discussions with older people to have an idea of their access to food.","guidance_phases":"In preparatory phase as well as phases I and II: use rapid assessment methods \u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nIn phases III and IV, organize surveys with larger samples or use rapid assessment method, with multi-indicator questionnaire","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H3 Communicable diseases, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"MUAC \u0026gt;210mm: no malnutrition;                                       MAM: MUAC \u0026lt;210mm                            SAM: MUAC\u0026lt;185mm or oedema (Help Age guidelines 2013)","comments":"older people are defined as \u0026quot;people aged 60 and above\u0026quot; (UN definition), but in some contexts (e.g. Somali, Ethiopia, Sudan etc.), can be 50 and above (as people are considered \u0026quot;old\u0026quot; from this age); Note: Nutritional oedema in older people may be difficult to distinguish from other types of oedema, so suggestion to separate BMI and oedema cases if necessary. Data on acute malnutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination elderly women and elderly men might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of elderly women and the percentage of elderly men suffering from acute malnutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs as well as on the social and family support networks available to them that might differ, hence impacting differently  their nutritional well being."},{"id":"2039","label":"Acute malnutrition based on MUAC and oedema","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-008","code":"N-008","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%)  of children 6-59 months with MUAC less than 125 mm and\/or having bilateral pitting oedema\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children aged  6-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children aged 6-59 months that meet the criteria for wasting based on MUAC","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424861217","data_sources":"Population surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART) \u0026amp; rapid nutrition assessment ","general_guidance":"When possible to use representative surveys, alternatively  -  rapid nutrition assessment with smaller number of children can give an idea of the situation - but these findings from a rapid nutrition assessment - with small numbers of children need to be treated with caution and should NOT be presented as prevalence but as number of children ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase I,II;                            added to surveys Phase III,IV ","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F5 Market Access, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children\u0026#039;s Fund, 2009. ","comments":"It is a good practice to disaggregate  oedema cases, however there is a concern of accuracy and precision"},{"id":"2043","label":"Stunting in women of reproductive age","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-012","code":"N-012","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of  women 15-49 years old who have height less than 145 cm\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of women 15-49 years surveyed","numerator":"Number of women 15-49 years that meet the criteria for stunting","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424862224","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2042","label":"Acute malnutrition in Pregnant and Lactating Women","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-011","code":"N-011","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) PLW with MUAC less than 210-230 mm (Note: Countries use a range of different cut-offs depending on resources)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of Pregnant and Lactating Women with infants below age of 0 to 5 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of Pregnant and Lactating Women with infants 0-5 months that meet the criteria for acute malnutrition based on MUAC","disaggregation":"Geographical area","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424862201","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART) or rapid nutrition assessment ","general_guidance":"There are NO agreed international Cut off points for MUAC for PLW so National MUAC cut off points may vary,  If available\/possible, use representative survey, if not -  rapid nutrition assessment with smaller number of PLW can give you some idea of the situation","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"All phases ","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":"PLW may be a problematic to define and identify, SMART surveys provide data for women with children, so definition of lactating should be mothers with infants 0-5 months; caution on excluding women in first pregnancy"},{"id":"2041","label":"Moderate acute malnutrition based on MUAC","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-010","code":"N-010","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) children 6-59 months with MUAC less than 125 mm but equal or  more than 115 mm\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children aged  6-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children aged 6-59 months that meet the criteria for moderate wasting based on MUAC","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424861305","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"When possible to use representative survey, alternatively  -  rapid nutrition assessment with smaller number of children can give you a idea of the situation - but these findings from a rapid nutrition assessment - with small numbers of children need to be treated with caution and should NOT be presented as prevalence but as number of children ","guidance_baseline":"Prevalence easy to derive by subtracting Proportion of severe wasting based on low MUAC from Proportion of wasting based on low MUAC","guidance_phases":"Phase I,II;                            added to surveys Phase III,IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F5 Market Access, F7 Utilization, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2040","label":"Severe acute malnutrition based on  MUAC and oedema","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-009","code":"N-009","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) children 6-59 months with MUAC less than 115 mm and\/or having bilateral pitting oedema\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children aged  6-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children aged 6-59 months that meet the criteria for severe wasting based on MUAC","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424861240","data_sources":"Population surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART) \u0026amp; rapid nutrition assessment ","general_guidance":"When possible to use representative surveys, alternatively  -  rapid nutrition assessment with smaller number of children can give an idea of the situation - but these findings from a rapid nutrition assessment - with small numbers of children need to be treated with caution and should NOT be presented as prevalence but as number of children ","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase I,II;                            added to surveys Phase III,IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F5 Market Access, F7 Utilization, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children\u0026#039;s Fund, 2009. ","comments":"It is a good practice to disaggregate  oedema cases, however there is a concern of accuracy and precision."},{"id":"2037","label":"Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) in infants 0-5 months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-006","code":"N-006","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of moderate acute malnutrition in infants less than 6 months of age based on weight-for-height z-score less than -2 and equal or greater than -3 standard deviations of the median of the standard population (WHO 2006)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children  less than 6 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of infants less than 6 months that meet the criteria for moderate acute malnutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424861156","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"Prevalence easy to derive by subtracting Proportion of SAM from Proportion of GAM","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"No standard WHO thresholds; this indicator cut-off should be interpreted in consideration of other indicators including  morbidity, mortality and proportion of GAM","comments":"Note that WFH and MUAC do not measure the same things and are not comparable. Data on the moderate acute malnutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination baby girls or baby boys might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of infant girls and the percentage of infant boys suffering from malnutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs on breastfeeding that might differently impact on baby girls\u0026#039; and baby boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being."},{"id":"2036","label":"Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-005","code":"N-005","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of moderate acute malnutrition in children 6 to 59 months of age based on presence of weight-for-height z-score less than -2 and equal or greater than -3 standard deviations of the median of the standard population (WHO 2006)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children aged  6-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children aged 6-59 months that meet the criteria for moderate acute malnutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424861097","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"Prevalence easy to derive by subtracting SAM from GAM","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"No standard WHO thresholds; this indicator cut-off should be interpreted in consideration of other indicators including  morbidity, mortality and proportion of GAM","comments":"Note that WFH and MUAC do not measure the same things and are not comparable. Data on the moderate acute malnutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination girls or boys might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of girls and the percentage of boys suffering from malnutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing in equally accessing nutrition, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs that might differently impact on girls\u0026#039; and boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being."},{"id":"2045","label":"Undernutrition for 5 to 19 year olds","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-014","code":"N-014","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of children and adolescents 5-19 years of age with Z-scores defined as BMI-for-age index less than -2 standard deviations from the median BMI of  a reference population of children\/adolescents of the same age and\/or having bilateral pitting oedema\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children and adolescents 5-19 years surveyed","numerator":"Number of children  and adolescents 5-19 years that meet the criteria for undernutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"No","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244988","changed":"1424870611","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Preparatory and phase iv and beyond ","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, H3 Communicable diseases, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W4 Vector Control, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"WHO Reference 2007 www.who.int\/growthref. ","comments":"Particularly important for adolescent girls. Data on the undernutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination girls, boys, adolescent girls and adolescent boys might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of girls and the percentage of  boys suffering from undernutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs that might differently impact on girls\u0026#039; and boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being. Note: the indicator includes 5.0 to 19.0 years. Based on WHO 2007 reference population"},{"id":"2033","label":"Acute malnutrition in infants less than 6 months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-002","code":"N-002","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of global acute malnutrition in infants less than 6 months of age based on presence of bilateral pitting oedema and \/or weight-for-height z-score less than -2 standard deviations of the median of the standard population (WHO 2006)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children  less than 6 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of infants 0-5 months that meet the criteria for global acute malnutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244353","changed":"1424861019","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"WHO TRS 854. Severity classification: 5,10, 15%","comments":"Note that WFH and MUAC do not measure the same things and are not comparable. Data on the acute malnutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination baby girls or baby boys might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of infant girls and the percentage of infant boys suffering from malnutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs on breastfeeding that might differently impact on baby girls\u0026#039; and baby boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being."},{"id":"2034","label":"Severe acute malnutrition (SAM)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-003","code":"N-003","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of severe acute malnutrition in children 6 to 59 months of age based on presence of bilateral pitting oedema and \/ or weight-for-height z-score less than -3 standard deviations of the median of the standard population (WHO 2006)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children aged  6-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children aged 6-59 months that meet the criteria for severe acute malnutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244353","changed":"1424861043","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"No standard WHO thresholds; this indicator cut-off should be interpreted in consideration of other indicators including  morbidity, mortality and proportion of GAM; Reference: WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children\u0026#039;s Fund, 2009. ","comments":"Note that WFH and MUAC do not measure the same things and are not comparable. Data on the severe acute malnutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination girls or boys might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of girls and the percentage of boys suffering from malnutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing in equally accessing nutrition, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs that might differently impact on girls\u0026#039; and boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being."},{"id":"2035","label":"Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in infants 0-5 months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-004","code":"N-004","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of severe acute malnutrition in infants less than 6 months of age based on presence of bilateral pitting oedema and weight-for-height z-score less than -3 standard deviations of the median of the standard population (WHO 2006)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children  0-5 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of infants 0-5 months that meet the criteria for severe acute malnutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244353","changed":"1424861079","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory;                             Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"No standard WHO thresholds; this indicator cut-off should be interpreted in consideration of other indicators including  morbidity, mortality and proportion of GAM; Reference: WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children\u0026#039;s Fund, 2009. ","comments":"Note that WFH and MUAC do not measure the same things and are not comparable. Data on the severe acute malnutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination baby girls or baby boys might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of infant girls and the percentage of infant boys suffering from malnutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs on breastfeeding that might differently impact on baby girls\u0026#039; and baby boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being."},{"id":"2032","label":"Global acute malnutrition  (GAM) ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/n-001","code":"N-001","global_clusters":"Nutrition","domain":"N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPrevalence rate (%) of global acute malnutrition in children 6 to 59 months of age based on presence of bilateral pitting oedema and \/ or weight-for-height z-score less than -2 standard deviations of the median of the standard population (WHO 2006)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage ","denominator":"Total number of children aged  6-59 months surveyed","numerator":"Number of children aged 6-59 months that meet the criteria for global acute malnutrition","disaggregation":"Geographical area, age, sex","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393244277","changed":"1424860968","data_sources":"Population-based surveys with representative sampling methods (MICS, DHS, SMART)","general_guidance":"Should be based on a methodologically solid anthropometric nutrition survey finding and include Confidence Intervals","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"preparatory; Phase III and IV","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, H2 Child health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, W1 Hygiene Promotion, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"WHO TRS 854. Severity classification: 5,10, 15%","comments":"Note that WFH and MUAC do not measure the same things and are not comparable.  Data on the global malnutrition rate should be compared by sex in order to identify any specific discrimination girls or boys might face in accessing nutrition. In case there is an important difference between the percentage of girls and the percentage of boys suffering from malnutrition, the programme should address these gaps by undertaking a gender analysis of the specific challenges the disadvantaged group is facing in equally accessing nutrition, including an analysis of the socio cultural habits and beliefs that might differently impact on girls\u0026#039; and boys\u0026#039; nutritional well being."},{"id":"1972","label":"Percentage of households that have changed intra-household food distribution","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-19","code":"F-19","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F7 Utilization","description":"\u003Cp\u003EAssessing the impact of the crisis on food distribution patterns inside the HHs. The change can occur in several ways and have several degrees of severity: i.e. adults restrict consumption for children to eat, women do not eat to give food only to men (as they work) etc.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Households","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112629","changed":"1415971625","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"N2 Infant and Young Child Feeding","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1971","label":"Percentage of HHs with capacity to prepare food safely","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-18","code":"F-18","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F7 Utilization","description":"\u003Cdiv\u003Eproportion of households with capacity to prepare food safely (fuel, water, cooking utensils, food)\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/div\u003E","unit":"Households\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393112568","changed":"1416231467","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"H6 Environmental Health, N1 Prevention and Management of Acute Malnutrition, W1.1 Hygiene items, W1.2 Hygiene Practices","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1975","label":"Percentage of individuals having daily access to an appropriate amount of safe water","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-17","code":"F-17","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F7 Utilization","description":"\u003Cdiv\u003EPercentage of individuals\/HHs that have daily access to an appropriate quantity \u0026nbsp;(a minimum of 15 litres per person per day of water) and quality of water, coming from an improved water source.\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/div\u003E","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393112444","changed":"1416231388","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2222","label":"Change in production compared to previous year\u2019s harvest by commodity","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-12","code":"F-12","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F6.1 Food Availability and Agriculture","description":"\u003Cdiv\u003EComparing the last years\u0026#39; (normal production) with the post crisis crop production which is also an indicator that can give information on household access to income\u003C\/div\u003E\u003Cdiv\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/div\u003E","unit":"","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112290","changed":"1424860183","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"Significant Change. To be compared with pre-crisis baseline\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","comments":""},{"id":"1979","label":"Change in access to functioning markets","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-9","code":"F-9","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EA market is here understood as a place where people are able to buy and sell products, including food, agricultural inputs and other consumption goods. Functioning markets are characterised by the existence of competition (between sellers as well as buyers), and availability of information.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Village","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860103","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1978","label":"Change in availability of key commodities in markets","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-10","code":"F-10","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F6 Availability","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMeasuring the difference in availability of key commodities will indicate if markets are under stress at different periods of time in comparison to the baseline.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"number of food commudities","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393112079","changed":"1415969192","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1977","label":"Percentage of Households\/ communities unable to plant for next season","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-13","code":"F-13","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F6 Availability","description":"\u003Cp\u003EShare of households that are unable to restart their agricultural activities in the upcoming cropping season. To be able to farm, HHs need access to arable land, seeds, tools and other agricultural inputs. Depending on the type of crisis, one or more of these can become unavailable.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860201","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"This indicator is more precise measured as % of HH, however if this information is not available particularly in early phases of the emergency then % of communities can be used as a proxy.","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1976","label":"Change in herd sizes","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-14","code":"F-14","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F6 Availability","description":"\u003Cp\u003EReporting on the percentage of change to overall herd sizes (households that either lost animals because of the crisis or had to sell or slaughter their animals as an emergency measure).\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Household","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860254","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"This indicator is more precise measured as % of HH, however if this information is not available particularly in early phases of the emergency then % of communities can be used as a proxy.","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1980","label":"Expenditure patterns","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-7","code":"F-7","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EChange in expenditure patterns in % terms, especially on items such as food, health, education, housing, transportation, clothing fuel and water among others..\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Household","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860031","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"Levels \/ threshold will vary according to context","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Signficant Change. To be compared with pre-crisis baseline","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1973","label":"Number of reported animal disease outbreaks","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-15","code":"F-15","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F6 Availability","description":"\u003Cp\u003ENumber of animal disease outbreaks in a community or in any given geographical area.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number (animals)","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860268","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"Need to define which HHs to be included in the denominator","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"H6 Environmental Health","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2223","label":"change in HH ownership of productive assets","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-8","code":"F-8","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003ERecording of the pre- and post-crises ownership of specific assets. Assets are generally classified as productive assets (if linked to a livelihood and income generating activities) and household assets.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Households","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860055","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2221","label":"Percentage of Households by duration of staple food stock","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-11","code":"F-11","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F6 Availability","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPercentage of households that have stocks of staple food to feed their family or have the capacity to access food stocks for a given duration of time.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Households","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860161","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(R) Early Recovery","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1974","label":"Percentage of Households with suitable daily water and fodder consumption for livestock","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-16","code":"F-16","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F6 Availability","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPercentage of households that have enough suitable water and fodder available for their animals. In many contexts in may be relevant to collect the data by community.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Households","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393112079","changed":"1424860331","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"Need to define which HHs to be included in the denominator","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1970","label":"Change in ability to meet survival and livelihoods protection thresholds","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-6","code":"F-6","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cdiv\u003EThis indicator uses the HEA approach to determine households\u0026rsquo; survival and livelihoods protection thresholds and with shocks, their ability to meet their needs, using their coping strategies, as per the baseline.\u003C\/div\u003E","unit":"Household","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393112046","changed":"1416231259","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"P5 Vulnerability, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":"For Standards, also see:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\nSphere: Food security and nutrition chapter + assessment annexes"},{"id":"1981","label":"Change in food consumption patterns","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-1","code":"F-1","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003ECan be measured by several indicatos like Food Consumption Score (FCS) And Household dietary diveristy score (HDDS). Current compared to pre-crisis. Frequency of meals, dietary diversity, increase\/ decrease of certain food items.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Household","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Context specific (HH, Community, Individual); Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393111882","changed":"1424859906","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Signficant Change. To be compared with pre-crisis baseline","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1998","label":"Number of institutional sites assisted (e.g. schools, health centres), as % of planned","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-13","code":"F-Output-13","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"","unit":"School, health centres or other","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393111882","changed":"1416231574","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"E1 Access and Learning Environment, R4 Governance, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1996","label":"Number of people trained as % of planned (e.g. best nutrition practice or land conservation etc.)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-11","code":"F-Output-11","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"Total planned people","numerator":"Actual number of people","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393111882","changed":"1415975406","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"R3 Capacity Building","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1983","label":"% change in key food \u0026amp; non-food commodity prices","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-3","code":"F-3","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EComparison between pre-crisis and actual prices of the main food and non-food commodities in the market.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Prices","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393111882","changed":"1416231232","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"No","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, W1.1 Hygiene items, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1997","label":"Number of market system actors involved in emergency response","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-12","code":"F-Output-12","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"","unit":"Traders, retailes, or other","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393111882","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1982","label":"Change in food source","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-2","code":"F-2","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003EChange in % share of sources for obtaining food compared to baseline, which could include food purchase, food production, borrowed food, food aid, gifts, barter or wild foods.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Household","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393111882","changed":"1424859953","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 1-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"Signficant Change. To be compared with pre-crisis baseline","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1985","label":"Change in main source of income","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-5","code":"F-5","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003Ethe changes occurred to the income derived from any given sources. It is imperative to have pre-crisis information to be able to value it. Example of sources of income can include crop production, wage labour, trading, livestock, fishery, exploitation of natural resources, salary and remittances.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Household","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1393111882","changed":"1424859994","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"Specify what is intended by staple food; levels \/ threshold will vary according to context.","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"Signficant Change. To be compared with pre-crisis baseline","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1984","label":"Coping Strategies","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-4","code":"F-4","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F3 Food Access","description":"\u003Cp\u003ECan be measured by several indicatos like the reduced Coping Strategy Index, the Household Hunger Scale or similar hunger experience indicator. Also the livelihood component can be included.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Household","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393111882","changed":"1416231175","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"P5 Vulnerability, S3.2 Assistance, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1995","label":"Quantity of input items distributed,\u00a0as % of planned","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-10","code":"F-Output-10","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F8 Agriculture and Livestock","description":"","unit":"Agricultural inputs\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393111853","changed":"1415975372","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1993","label":"Number of beneficiaries receiving agricultural inputs as % of planned beneficiaries","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-8","code":"F-Output-8","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F8 Agriculture and Livestock","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIncluding animals\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Output","created":"1393111679","changed":"1424860440","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1994","label":"Germination rates\/harvest quantities as % of planned","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-9","code":"F-Output-9","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F8 Agriculture and Livestock","description":"\u003Cp\u003EPending Food Cluster review in 2013.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"n\/a","denominator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","numerator":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Output","created":"1393111679","changed":"1424860456","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1992","label":"Number of\u00a0assets built, restored or maintained to targeted beneficiaries, by type and unit of measure (e.g. hectares of land where conservation activities were implemented, length and type of irrigation systems restored, hectares recovered for farming)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-7","code":"F-Output-7","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003ETitle: Number of assets built, restored or maintained to targeted beneficiaries, by type and unit of measure (e.g. hectares of land where conservation activities were implemented, length and type of irrigation systems restored, hectares recovered for farming) as % of planned\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Number of assets\u003Cbr \/\u003E\r\n","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393111494","changed":"1416231591","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"R4 Governance, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1986","label":"Number of beneficiaries receiving food, non-food items, cash transfers and vouchers as % of planned","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-1","code":"F-Output-1","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Output","created":"1393110976","changed":"1424860394","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"W1.1 Hygiene items, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1989","label":"Total value of cash or vouchers for food and basic needs distributed, as % of planned","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-4","code":"F-Output-4","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"","unit":"Value of cahs and\/or vouchers","denominator":"Total quantity planned","numerator":"Actual distributed","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393110976","changed":"1415975468","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1988","label":"Quantity of food assistance distributed, as % of planned","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-3","code":"F-Output-3","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"","unit":"Tons, or value of cash or vouchers","denominator":"Total quantity planned","numerator":"Actual distributed","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393110976","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1990","label":"Frequency of food\/cash assistance to beneficiary HH (months)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-5","code":"F-Output-5","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"","unit":"Number of months","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1393110976","changed":"1398422581","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1987","label":"Quantity of food\/value of cash\/voucher received by beneficiary HH (and proportion in relation to food basket)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-2","code":"F-Output-2","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1 Food Assistance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator should express the percentage of the food needs that are covered by the ration distributed\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"n\/a","denominator":"Total planned food basket per HH","numerator":"Actual received by HH","disaggregation":"Geography; Sex; Age; Disabilities; Any other relevant criteria, such as urban\/rural, community, household, religious, ethnic or political identities)","key":"","types":"Output","created":"1393110976","changed":"1424860419","data_sources":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"Pending Food Cluster review in 2013.","guidance_phases":"Appropriate in phases 2-4 of a new L3 emergency","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1960","label":"Number and Percentage of spontaneous displacement sites where a site plan\/ map has been created and is kept up to date.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-29","code":"CM-29","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination","description":"\u003Cp\u003EUpdates to a displacement site plan provide us with a way to measure improvements to the infrastructure of spontaneous displacement sites.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage (spontaneous)","denominator":"Total number of spontaneous displacement sites","numerator":"Number of spontaneous displacement sites with improvements in site planning and facilities","disaggregation":"Type of displacement site","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424946265","data_sources":"DTM reports, CODs, FODs, site management reports, Site Manager meeting minutes","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P5 Vulnerability, W7 Aggravating Factors, E1.1 Equal Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1962","label":"Number of displacement sites where consultations with all strata of displaced populations take place about their needs to inform planning and programs","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-32","code":"CM-32","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of displacement sites","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where consultations with all strata of displaced populations about their needs occur","disaggregation":"Displacement site, vulnerable groups; age, sex, other diversity concerns of  consulted individuals","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1416222514","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"(P) Protection","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1961","label":"Number and Percentage of site managers with CCCM training","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-31","code":"CM-31","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.1 Displacement Site Managers","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of site managers","numerator":"Number of site managers with CCCM training","disaggregation":"Site manager; CCCM training; Training beneficiary type (Government, NGO, UN, other) ; sex, age, other diversity concerns of site manager with CCCM training","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424793064","data_sources":"DTM reports, CODs, FODs, site management reports, CCCM training reports","general_guidance":"Training includes CORE, CMC \u0026amp; CCCM trainings.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination","threshold":"See Camp Management ToR to define who is a camp manager","comments":""},{"id":"1959","label":"Number and Percentage of displaced persons in displacement sites that cannot return","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-28","code":"CM-28","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2.2 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator refers to displaced persons by sex and age who intend to return but cannot. This may be for a number of reasons including: lack of money, disability, ongoing security concerns, government or other restrictions on movement.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of displaced persons that intend to return","numerator":"Number of displaced persons that cannot return","disaggregation":"Number of displaced persons; Intention of return; reason for inability to return; sex; age","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424946209","data_sources":"DTM reports, Protection Monitoring Tool reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 3-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R3 Capacity Building, S2 Shelter-related NFI, PL2 Access to Land, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1958","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites where common services are targetted to reach vulnerable groups","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/indicator\/cm-26","code":"CM-25","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination","description":"\u003Cp\u003ECommon services can incude general distributions, food, WASH, and Education (to be define at the national\/ local level). This indicator is linked to indicator 16 measuring general services reaching all populations including most vulnerable populations. Such mechanisms are put in place to ensure that general services provided reach the most vulnerable populations (minority groups, female-headed households, disabled, elderly, children). An example of common service targetting would be placing vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, at the front of distribution queues.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with assistance targeting mechanisms in place","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Vulnerable group (disabled, elderly, singel headed household, children, etc)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792535","data_sources":"DTM reports, FOCUS, Meetings in Camp, camp\/site Focal Point, CODs, FODs, MIRA","general_guidance":"Vulnerable sectors of the population include the disabled, single-headed households, UAMs, elderly, GBV, et cetera","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"(C) Camp Coordination \/ Management, E1.1 Equal Access, E1.2 Facilities and services, E1.3 Protection and Well-being, F1 Food Assistance, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (N) Nutrition, (R) Early Recovery, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1957","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites that have functioning health services within walking distance that IDP populations can attend","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-23","code":"CM-23","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.10 Service Provision - Health","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors whether IDP populations in displacement sites have access to basic health services. Health services include health clinics and moblie health teams. Even if functioning, health services may not be equally accessible to all members of the displaced population (eg. because of disability, sex, and related security concerns). Qualitative data should be sought on who is able\/unable to access health services.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites that have functioning health services within walking distance that IDP populations can attend","disaggregation":"Displacement Site; Type of service; age, sex, other diversity concerns of those who have access to health services","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792430","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phases 3-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H2 Child health, H3 Communicable diseases, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H5 Non communicable diseases and mental health, H6 Environmental Health, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence","threshold":"","comments":"When using this indicator the cluster should be careful to define whether this is or is not including the host population, as this may greatly affect whether needs are met."},{"id":"1956","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites with food\/nutrition needs where at least one food distribution has taken place within the past month","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-22","code":"CM-22","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.5 Service Provision - Food and Nutrition","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors whether IDP populations in displacement sites with food needs have access to food distributions.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with food\/nutrition needs where at least one food distribution has taken place within the past month","disaggregation":"Displacement Site; Type of service; sex, age, other diversity concerns of food\/nutrition recipients","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792414","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, F1 Food Assistance, F3 Food Access, (N) Nutrition, P5 Vulnerability, E1.2 Facilities and services","threshold":"","comments":"When using this indicator the cluster should be careful to define whether this is or is not including the host population, as this may greatly affect whether needs are met."},{"id":"1954","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites with NFI needs, in which at least one NFI distribution has taken place in the last three months","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-19","code":"CM-19","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.9 Service Provision - WASH \u0026amp;\/or Shelter","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors whether people in displacement sites with NFI needs are receiving distributions. This indicator is also a component of WASH and\/or Shelter service provision.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with NFI needs that have received at least one NFI distribution","disaggregation":"Displacement site; sex, age, other diversity concerns of NFI recipients","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792309","data_sources":"DTM reports, FOCUS","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phases 3-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H3 Communicable diseases, H4 Sexual and Reproductive Health, H4.2 Maternal and newborn care, H6 Environmental Health, P5 Vulnerability, S1 Shelter, W1.1 Hygiene items, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, E1.1 Equal Access, E1.2 Facilities and services","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1953","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites where all IDPs have access to shelter","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-18","code":"CM-18","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors whether people in a displacement site have access to shelter in each phase of an emergency. Where all IDPs do not have access to shelter, qualitative data should also be sought about who lacks access (eg. sex, age, ethnicity).\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where all IDPs have access to shelter","disaggregation":"Displacement Site; shelter type; sex, age, other diversity concerns of IDPs who have access to shelter","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792276","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phases 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods, R4 Governance, S2 Shelter-related NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1964","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites where gaps in services identified by site managers\/DTM are referred, monitored and followed up for response","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-34","code":"CM-34","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator seeks to keep site managers and the CCCM cluster accountable by ensuring gaps which are identified at the displacement site level are referred, monitored and followed up for action by relevant actors (WASH, Shelter, Health, Education, etc.)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of displacement sites","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where gaps in services have been referred, monitored and followed up for response","disaggregation":"Displacement Site","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1402048877","data_sources":"DTM reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"W7 Aggravating Factors, (P) Protection","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2219","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites in natural disasters with national authorities as site managers","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-30","code":"CM-30","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C1.1 Displacement Site Managers","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of displacement sites in natural disasters","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with national authorities as site managers","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Site management committee; National authority participation in site management committee; sex, age, other diversity concerns of site manager","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424793121","data_sources":"DTM reports, CODs, FODs, site management reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1963","label":"Percentage of site management personnel (including partners) that have undertaken the IASC Gender E-learning course.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-33","code":"CM-33","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of site managers","numerator":"Number of site managers that have completed the IASC Gender E-learning course","disaggregation":"Site manager, partners; age, sex, other diversity concerns of those who have taken the IASC course","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1402048872","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"(P) Protection","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2217","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites where specific services exist for vulnerable groups","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-26","code":"CM-26","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESpecific services are services required by vulnerable groups; Examples in this category include: support for survivors of sexual and gender based violence (SGBV), psychosocial support, sensitization projects (peace, reconciliation etc.), community services, youth programmes, support for special needs, camp committees, Child Friendly Spaces, and Disabled Access. Vulnerable groups may include, but are not limited to: Minority groups; disabled; single headed households; female-headed households; elderly; children\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where specific services exist for vulnerable groups (minority groups, disabled, single headed household, elderly, children)","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Vulnerable group (disabled, elderly, singel headed household, children)","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1416238824","data_sources":"FOCUS, Meetings in displacement site, Camp\/Site Focal Point, Pre-distribution reports, distribution reports, monitoring reports, DTM reports, Protection Monitoring Tool reports, MIRA","general_guidance":"Generic services include WASH, Shelter, NFIs, Health, Education, etc. Vulnerable sectors of the population include the disabled, single-headed households, UAMs, elderly, GBV.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, (R) Early Recovery, P1 (PC) Child Protection, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, E1.1 Equal Access, E1.2 Facilities and services, E1.3 Protection and Well-being, E2.1 Curricula, W7 Aggravating Factors, W8 WASH Programme Design and Implementation","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1955","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites where IDP population has access to potable water supply within walking distance.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-20","code":"CM-20","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors whether IDP populations in displacement sites have access to potable water.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where IDP population has access to potable water supply within walking distance.","disaggregation":"Displacement Site; Type of service; sex, age, other diversity concerns of those who have access to potable water","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792348","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, H6 Environmental Health, (N) Nutrition, P5 Vulnerability, W2.1 Access and Water Quantity, W2.2 Water Quality, F1 Food Assistance, F7 Utilization, E1.2 Facilities and services","threshold":"","comments":"When using this indicator the cluster should be careful to define whether this is or is not including the host population, as this may greatly affect whether needs are met."},{"id":"2214","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites where residents have access to law enforcement mechanisms","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-17","code":"CM-17","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.4 Service Provision - Protection","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator covers one aspect of protection in displacement sites. Law enforcement mechanisms, such as policing, civilian security patrols, access to courts and national justice systems, codes for dispute resolution, reporting mechanisms, and referral systems, contribute to a safer site environment by reducing the risk of protection incidents and providing a means to address them when they occur. Even when law enforcement mechanisms are in place, these may not be equally accessible to all members of the displaced population. Qualitative data should also be sought about who is represented in these structures (eg. youth, disabled, women, minority groups).\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where residents have access to law enforcement mechanisms","disaggregation":"Displacement site; law enforcement mechanism; law enforcement structure representation and users should be broken down by age, sex,  disability, other diversity concerns","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792088","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phases 2-4","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, (P) Protection, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":"When using this indicator the cluster should be careful to define whether this is or is not including the host population, as this may greatly affect whether needs are met."},{"id":"2215","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites where IDP population has access to WASH infrastructure.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-21","code":"CM-21","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.2 Service Provision - WASH","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors whether IDP populations in displacement sites have access to WASH infrastructure. A displacement site must have sex separated lockable latrines, solid waste disposal, bathing faciliities, and drainage in order to answer yes to this question.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where IDP population has access to WASH infrastructure.","disaggregation":"Displacement Site; Type of service; sex, age, other diversity concerns of those who have access to WASH infrastructure","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792392","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, (R) Early Recovery, W2.3 Water Facilities, W3.1 Environment, W3.2 Toilet Facilities, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":"When using this indicator the cluster should be careful to define whether this is or is not including the host population, as this may greatly affect whether needs are met."},{"id":"2216","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites that have schools within walking distance that IDP children\/youth can attend.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-24","code":"CM-24","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.6 Service Provision - Education","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors whether IDP children and youth in displacement sites have access to education. Even if present, schools may not be equally accessible to all children (eg. because of disability, sex and related security concerns). Qualitative data should also be sought on who is able\/unable to attend school based on sex and age.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites that have schools within walking distance that IDP children\/youth can attend.","disaggregation":"Displacement Site; Type of educational institution ; sex, age, other diversity concerns of children who have access to school","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424792486","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phases 3-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P1 (PC) Child Protection, (R) Early Recovery, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E1.1 Equal Access, E1.2 Facilities and services, E1.3 Protection and Well-being","threshold":"","comments":"When using this indicator the cluster should be careful to define whether this is or is not including the host population, as this may greatly affect whether needs are met."},{"id":"2218","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites with active relocation, reintegration or return programmes.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-27","code":"CM-27","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C4.1 Return\/ Relocation\/ Integration","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator is intended to measure how many camp managers are actively working on durable solutions.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with active relocation, resettlement or return programmes","disaggregation":"Displacement site; sex, age, other diversity concerns of programme participants","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392992533","changed":"1424946119","data_sources":"DTM, Site Manager Meeting Minutes, Intention Surveys","general_guidance":"Evidence of activities will come from a responsible reporting party, such as the site manager or government official responsible for the site.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, R4 Governance, E1.1 Equal Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2211","label":"Estimated number and percentage of displaced persons in displacement sites without documentation","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-06","code":"CM-06","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator is linked to the registration process when displaced people\u0026#039;s documents can be seen\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of displaced persons","numerator":"Number of displaced persons without documentation","disaggregation":"Type of registration documentation; Vulnerable persons by sex and age","key":"No","types":"Baseline","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791322","data_sources":"DTM reports, MIRA, Protection Monitoring Tool reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -  Phase 1-2","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, S2 Shelter-related NFI","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1944","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites in urban areas receiving urban site management services.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-05","code":"CM-05","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator is concerned with displacement sites in urban areas. The definition of an urban area should be decided at national level. \u0026#039;Urban site management services\u0026#039; include CCCM mechanisms such as population statistics monitoring, self governance mechanisms, monitoring service provision, site manager.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated in urban areas","numerator":"Number of displacement sites in urban areas receiving urban site management services","disaggregation":"Displacement site; site type; population size.  If displacement sites vary significantly by size, it may be necessary to disaggregate by population size or displacement site type (eg collective centre\/ spontaneous site); sex, age, disability, and other diversity concerns of service users","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791307","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, (E) Education, F1 Food Assistance, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (N) Nutrition, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, (R) Early Recovery, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1941","label":"Number of displacement sites","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-02","code":"CM-02","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis data is already recorded and available as a FOD and will feed into other indicators.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage (spontaneous)","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of spontaneous displacement sites","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Type of displacement site (camps, spontaneous sites and collective centres)","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791187","data_sources":"FOD","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 1-4","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, E1.1 Equal Access, F1 Food Assistance, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (N) Nutrition, P6 Displacement and Return, (R) Early Recovery, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":"This data is already recorded and available as a FOD"},{"id":"1943","label":"Number and percentage of IDP populations living in displacement sites in urban areas.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-04","code":"CM-04","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator is concerned with displacement sites in urban areas with sex and age disaggregation. The definition of an urban area should be decided at national level.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated in urban areas","numerator":"Number of displaced people living in displacement sites in urban areas","disaggregation":"Displacement site; site type; population size.  If displacement sites vary significantly by size, it may be necessary to disaggregate by population size or displacement site type (eg collective centre\/ spontaneous site) ; sex, age, disability, and other diversity concerns","key":"No","types":"Baseline","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791233","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"As per Indicator description the quality of data collection sources will improve over the duration of the emergency with population profiling early in the emergency and registration in later phases.","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, E1.1 Equal Access, F1 Food Assistance, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (N) Nutrition, P6 Displacement and Return, (R) Early Recovery, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2220","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites conducting IDP registration activities","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-08","code":"CM-08","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2.1 CCCM Mechanisms","description":"\u003Cp\u003ERegistration activities may be at the household or individual level with sex and age disaggregation. An estimiation of the displacement site population is important for creating distibution lists, tracking population movements, monitoring site programing, case management, and ensuring accurate representation of vulnerable populations.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number and percentage of displacement sites conducting population registration","disaggregation":"Displacement site; sex, age, disability, and other diversity concerns of registered IDPs","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791958","data_sources":"DTM, Site Manager Records","general_guidance":"De-registration\/departure should be monitored but not controlled in order to adequately calculate needs within the displacement site","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, (P) Protection, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1940","label":"Total estimated number displaced people living in displacement sites (this includes camps, spontaneous sites and collective centres)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-01","code":"CM-01","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe number of people in need of different types of assistance will need to be defined at the national and local level. This data is already recorded as a COD and will feed into other indicators.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Estimation","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"Total estimated number displaced people living in displacement sites (this includes camps, spontaneous sites and collective centres)","disaggregation":"Displacement site; type of displacement site (camps, spontaneous sites and collective centres) ; sex, age, disability, and other diversity concerns","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1392991592","changed":"1495441584","data_sources":"COD","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"As per Indicator description the quality of data collection sources will improve over the duration of the emergency with population profiling early in the emergency and registration in later phases.","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, E1.1 Equal Access, F1 Food Assistance, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (N) Nutrition, P6 Displacement and Return, (R) Early Recovery, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"This data is already recorded and available as a COD"},{"id":"1942","label":"Number and percentage of IDP population living in displacement sites that have been registered at the household level","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-03","code":"CM-03","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis can express a need in terms of people requiring registration, or an output in terms of what partners have done to register displaced people by sex and age.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage (IDP)","denominator":"Total estimated number displaced people living in displacement sites (this includes camps, spontaneous sites and collective centres)","numerator":"Number of people registered by household registration living in displacement sites","disaggregation":"Displacement site; sex, age, disability, and other diversity concerns","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791210","data_sources":"DTM reports, FOCUS","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phases 3-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, (E) Education, F1 Food Assistance, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F8 Agriculture and Livestock, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (N) Nutrition, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (R) Early Recovery, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1945","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites with established CCCM mechanisms","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-07","code":"CM-07","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2.1 CCCM Mechanisms","description":"\u003Cp\u003ESites which have any one of the following mechanisms operational - population statistics monitoring by sex and age, women\u0026#039;s committees, and camp committees with women representation, self governance mechanisms, monitoring service provision, site manager\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with established CCCM mechanisms","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Types of mechanisms (population statistics monitoring, self governance mechanisms, monitoring service provision) ; sex, age, disability, and other diversity concerns","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791349","data_sources":"CCCM Cluster Meetings","general_guidance":"CCCM mechanisms could include administrative, management and\/or coordination structures.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4; Early phases may use displacement profiling; and later phases likely to use registration. Although registration is always recommended where possible.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, (P) Protection, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, (N) Nutrition","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1946","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites where de-registration\/ departure is monitored","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-09","code":"CM-09","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2.1 CCCM Mechanisms","description":"\u003Cp\u003EDe-registration\/departure should be monitored but not controlled in order to adequately calculate needs within the displacement site and plan accordingly.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites where de-registration\/ departure is monitored","disaggregation":"Displacement site; sex, age, disability, and other diversity concerns of departed IDPs","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392991592","changed":"1424791967","data_sources":"DTM, Site Manager Records","general_guidance":"De-registration\/departure should be monitored but not controlled in order to adequately calculate needs within the displacement site","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, (P) Protection, R4 Governance, S1 Shelter, S2 Shelter-related NFI, S3 Shelter-related Fuel\/Energy","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2313","label":"Percentage of debris collected which is recycled (e.g. for shelter, furniture, livelihoods production etc)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-11","code":"R-11","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","description":"\u003Cp\u003EDebris or rubble can be recycled for shelter purposes - e.g. timber and bricks can be used for shelter. Some timber can be recycled for furniture construction and other debris can be processed and sold and contribute to strengthening economic livelihoods. Create opportunities for women and vulnerble groups to engage and benefit from recycling\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"age\/gender-different groups of society will recycle different things egg rags for sanitary napkins, or children\u0026#039;s toys can be made out of different items.","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392628964","changed":"1456907152","data_sources":"Cluster members- programme monitoring","general_guidance":"This indicator may be monitored together with the Shelter cluster or livelihoods clusters who support recycling of debris. For shelter purposes a standards and specs can be calculated. This can also be done for recycling for furniture and scrap metal (CGI) purposes. However the calculations will have to be done locally.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: in preliminary assessment determine the damage and losses (DALA) of materials Phase 2: together with local authorities and private sector and communities establish the type and amount material to be recycled. Phase 3: support the assessment, mapping, salvaging, transport and recycling mechanisms (roofing, shelter, construction, furniture, scrap metal, car repair etc.)","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3.11 Service Provision - Shelter, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, F2.3 In-kind Transfer, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2314","label":"Number of safe waste disposal sites identified in each targeted debris removal area","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-12","code":"R-12","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","description":"\u003Cp\u003EDebris removal and processing, including debris recycling, can be critical to helping a population to recover from crisis. It can also be essential to dispose of debris that is blocking humanitarian actives. Safe and well managed disposal sites are key to debris removal. They have to be established in suitable locations, follow national safety rules and be able to process all of the debris removed.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392628964","changed":"1456907285","data_sources":"Cluster members -programme monitoring","general_guidance":"This indicator may be monitored together with the Shelter cluster or livelihoods clusters who support the clearing of roads and private housing as well as the processing of debris. There is no recommended number of sites per location required.  The number of sites needed  must be ascertained by  specialist after estimating the amount of debris that needs removal and processing, and the context of the crisis.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"Selecting a safe disposal site for debris and rubble is important. This is done together with the local government and environmental experts to ensure that safety standards are adhered to. The approach will vary from context to context. The best solution should be found in the field together with partners.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2315","label":"Area and Percentage of affected landmass with problematic rubble\/debris present","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-10","code":"R-10","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","description":"\u003Cp\u003EDebris or rubble is the wreckage of the devastation and it includes everything that could possibly destroyed\/damaged, or materials brought about by a catastrophic event. Problematic refers to situations where such debris causes immediate physical and psychological barriers for emergency relief and recovery activities.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Meters squared and percentage","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1392628964","changed":"1456906821","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey","general_guidance":"The type of debris varies considerably depending on the type of hazards and vulnerable objects in the communities. Often building materials and broken\/ scattered remains form a major part of debris. Immediate clearance of debris becomes a pre-condition for restoration of accessibility in the affected sites. Debris management is a labour intensive process and offers employment opportunity for the unemployed labourers in the affected region. Recycling plays an important role for re-usable building materials from the debris\/rubble. The key steps in the management of debris include collection (putting them together in certain places\/points), clearance (putting them aside or stabilising unstable wreckages to ensure safe access), removal (taking them away from the site), recycling (salvaging or reusing), or disposal (taking the to the final solution) with the objectives of making debris no longer pose hindrance to humanitarian and recovery actions or obstacle and\/or hazard to the crisis affected populations. Clearance of debris is a labour intensive process. It is important to assess the problems of debris and specify the number of problematic sites in accordance with geographic subdivision of the crisis-affected areas. Refer to the Guidelines for Dealing with Disaster Waste (forthcoming) being developed by UNEP\/OCHA Environment Unit with the support of Swedish Civil Contingency Agency (MSB).","guidance_baseline":"Pre-crisis level information about land-use plan and built environment, types and use of building materials. Pre-crisis level information on unemployed day labourers including information about any cultural\/religious barrier for woman to work outside their homes.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: Determine if the catastrophic event\/crisis generates debris; Information about type and intensity of hazards combined with the knowledge of existing vulnerability should guide the understanding about possibility of debris accumulation. Undertake assessment of the type of debris and its geographic distribution in the affected areas. Analyse the problematic characteristics of debris in terms of both ? the way the presence of accumulated debris hinders emergency response and recovery as well as the efforts required for debris management including collection, recycling and disposal. Determine the number of problematic sites in line with the common parameters (eg.. site location, type and volume\/unit of debris, number of labours, crushers\/tools etc.) of the humanitarian operation; Phase 2: Confirm the number of sites with the common parameters. Gather field information for verification of the problem characteristics of debris with greater detail of its management including availability of sites for preservation of re-usable building materials during recovery period. Assess spontaneous responses of the affected communities and identify if emergency response actions include debris management component; Phase 3: Verify the numbers of sites and estimations with formal records when necessary triangulate with field data and third party analysis; Phase 4: Conduct in depth analysis of the debris management in relation to other indicators","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, H6 Environmental Health, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2316","label":"Number and Percentage of population with access to basic community infrastructure not covered by other sectors or clusters, e.g. police stations, town halls, administrative buildings. Schools (if not covered by Edu), playgrounds, parks","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-13","code":"R-13","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","description":"\u003Cp\u003En\/a\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"Type of basic infrastructure, e.g. police stations, town halls, administrative buildings, schools (if not covered by Edu), playgrounds, parks, By age\/gender\/other diversity issues such as mobility. These different grounds have to have access to services such a women friendly police stations, girls friendly schools, or those that have mobility access routes.","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1392628964","changed":"1456907463","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey","general_guidance":"Standards and local customs to be defined according to context. Basic community infrastructure are small scale, low cost, and community self-constructed basic infrastructure, technical facilities and systems to ensure basic services and thus are critical for sustenance of lives and livelihood of the population. Access refers to populations ability to make use of or take advantage of basic infrastructure. Types of basic community infrastructure are locally determined, usually include but not limited to community access roads, small drainage and water structures, socio-economic infrastructures, communication and early warning, community non-conventional energy plants, and community small and micro enterprises. Recovery of basic community infrastructure should be guided by the participation and insights of the affected communities. The process should use labour-intensive technologies particular attention should be given to ensure that future disaster risks and minimised during recovery. The extent of damage may suitably be categorized as minor damage, partial damage and complete damage with the understanding that minor damage can be repaired with little efforts by the community themselves. In the absence of a country-wide established method, cross-sectoral and community consultation will be needed to draw a balanced perspective in devising a method of estimation for people\u0026#039;s access with data disaggregated for each type of basic community infrastructure.","guidance_baseline":"Secondary data from National Statistical offices, special reports, report on community resources and risk mapping from local institutions, NGOs and Community Based Organisations. Statistical techniques may require to be applied for necessary extrapolation in preparing the baseline data.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: Identify and assess the type and the extent of damages of the basic community infrastructure and their distribution in the affected communities. The sources of information are likely to be different for each type of basic community infrastructure and it is also important to determine the number of population served in the community by an affected basic infrastructure of each type. Determine the number or persons affected by the crisis ? refer to the common parameter (common dataset) adopted by the Humanitarian Country Team. Analyse the impacts in the lives and livelihoods of community population and determine the numbers and types of basic community infrastructure for which repair and reconstruction are critically important for livelihood recovery of the community population. Assess spontaneous responses of the affected communities and identify if emergency response actions include a component of restoration of basic community infrastructure. Phase 2: Verify the information about the types and number of basic infrastructure to improve the data disaggregation. Determine the number of population having access to basic infrastructure; Phase 3: Verify and update the numbers and types of basic community infrastructure based on the available report of comprehensive joint assessment such as PDNA. Improve the precision by documenting population\u0026#039;s access to different types of basic infrastructure; Phase 4: Conduct in depth analysis of the basic community infrastructure","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"E1 Access and Learning Environment, F3 Food Access, F5 Market Access, F7 Utilization, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P6 Displacement and Return, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2317","label":"Number and location of community reconciliation efforts undertaken","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-14","code":"R-14","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R4 Governance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMeasured through the number of entities engaged in peace building\/reconciliation. E.g. schools, womens groups, ethnic groups, state\/non state actors, consultation of elders\/community leaders, faithbased organisations\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"Geography, sex, age, diversity, state\/non state","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1392628964","changed":"1456907719","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey and\/or cluster members - programme monitoring","general_guidance":"In order to do no harm - considerations should be made to understand the context, its players, existing capacities and resources and to build on services the community wants, rather than creating new services. ","guidance_baseline":"Stakeholder mapping, context analysis, analysis of social grievances, monitoring and intensive negotiations with aggrieved groups to prevent outbreak of conflict. Dissemination of early warning indicators.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: stakeholder mapping and risk analysis Phase 2: efforts by humanitarian community either establish or reinforce reconciliation mechanisms Phase 3: establish the type of support needed for the reconciliation groups to reach their peace goals","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E2 Teaching and Learning, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, E4 Educational Policy, F4 Income Access, P2 (PG) Gender-Based Violence, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":""},{"id":"2318","label":"Number and Percentage of non-functioning markets","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-15","code":"R-15","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMeasured through level of functionality: increased \/ unchanged \/ decreased activity\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"# of markets operational pre-crisis","numerator":"# of markets currently operational","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1392628964","changed":"1456907808","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey","general_guidance":"The ER Cluster must define carefully what constitutes a market in affected locations, before finding baseline information about pre-crisis markets and counting markets that are operational. ","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"n\/a","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2319","label":"Number and Percentage of affected population with no access to any formal or informal financial service","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-16","code":"R-16","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","description":"\u003Cp\u003EMeasured through level of functionality: increased \/ unchanged \/ decreased activity\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and percentage","denominator":"# people in population","numerator":"# of affected population with no access to any formal or informal financial service","disaggregation":"Geography, sex and age","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1392628964","changed":"1456908096","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"In order to do no harm - attempt should be made to understand the context, its players, existing capacities and resources and to build on these rather than creating new systems. When reaching out to non state actors - ensure understanding, acceptance and agreement with the community.","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"n\/a","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"F1 Food Assistance, F2 Livelihood Assistance, F3 Food Access, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, F6 Availability, F7 Utilization, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1991","label":"Total value of cash and vouchers for livelihood recovery distributed to targeted beneficiaries as % of planned","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/f-output-6","code":"F-Output-6","global_clusters":"Food Security","domain":"F1.4 Livelihood Recovery","description":"\u003Cp\u003Eother\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"","key":"","types":"","created":"1392075017","changed":"1415975499","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"","cross_tagging":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1939","label":"Weight of cargo transported\/stored","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/l-1","code":"L-1","global_clusters":"Logistics","domain":"L2 Weight","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"Type of logistics service (Storage or Transport by Mode); Organisation who requested the service; Sector supported; Date(s) of service provision; Location(s)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392069094","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"Logistics Cluster Reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"Note: The Logistics cluster does not provide transport and storage services in all countries where the cluster is activated, and even where it does the Logs cluster is not the only, and often not the primary supplier of services for humanitarian actors. Therefore this indicator will only provide a partial picture of total humanitarian logistics in a given country. When the logs cluster uses this indicator in a country, an explanation of the limitations on its usage should also be provided."},{"id":"1938","label":"Volume of cargo transported\/stored","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/l-2","code":"L-2","global_clusters":"Logistics","domain":"L1 Volume","description":"","unit":"","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"Type of logistics service (Storage or Transport by Mode); Organisation who requested the service; Sector supported; Date(s) of service provision; Location(s)","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392069094","changed":"1398422527","data_sources":"Logistics Cluster Reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"Note: The Logistics cluster does not provide transport and storage services in all countries where the cluster is activated, and even where it does the Logs cluster is not the only, and often not the primary supplier of services for humanitarian actors. Therefore this indicator will only provide a partial picture of total humanitarian logistics in a given country. When the logs cluster uses this indicator in a country, an explanation of the limitations on its usage should also be provided."},{"id":"2307","label":"Number of areas where local government across sectors use knowledge, innovation and education to build a culture of preparedness, safety and resilience. This is to be differentiated by age\/sex","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-4","code":"R-4","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R4 Governance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis could include Relevant information on disasters is available and accessible at all levels, to all stakeholders (through networks, development of information sharing system. ii. School curricula, education material and relevant trainings include risk reduction and recovery concepts and practices. iii. Research methods and tools for multi risk assessments and cost benefit analysis are developed and strengthened. iv. Country wide public awareness strategy exists to stimulate a culture of disaster resilience, with outreach to  urban and rural communities.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"# of affected areas","numerator":"# of affected areas with local government-led intersectoral resilience building initiatives","disaggregation":"Children, adults, elderly, vulnerable","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456906092","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey","general_guidance":"Livelihood assets are (human, capital, natural, physical, social, or financial) resource base of the household that when combined with capabilities and activities will generate means of living, and if sustainable, generate the well being of a household. Livelihood assets are to be determined locally. e.g. Fishing boats for coastal community, land and agricultural implements in the hinterlands, education, skills and capitals in urban area, house, car, household utilities, land, physical infrastructure, social networks, associations, etc.","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"This indicator should be monitored together with other cluster\/sector indicators on DRR, where local knowledge, innovation and education has been used build resilience across sectors and building disaster risk reduction capacity at sectoral level. This activity should take into account the variety of strengths and weakness of different parts of the community to ensure the plans are efficient and offer assistance to everyone.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.1 Displacement Site Managers, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2308","label":"Number and Percentage of households in need of income support","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-5","code":"R-5","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","description":"\u003Cp\u003EExamples of Households in Need of Income Support include those with very low income sources, female-headed households, Internally displaced people, households with a sex worker\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Percentage","denominator":"# of Households in affected area","numerator":"# of Households in affected area in need of income support","disaggregation":"Sex (male-\/female-headed household), and age","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456906190","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"n\/a","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"n\/a","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, F4 Income Access, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2309","label":"Number and Percentage of households with no income sources provided with income support (transfer or generation)","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-6","code":"R-6","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","description":"\u003Cp\u003En\/a\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"n\/a","numerator":"n\/a","disaggregation":"Sex (male-\/female-headed household), and age","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456906315","data_sources":"Cluster members- programme monitoring","general_guidance":"Disaster\/conflict affect peoples access to income and sustainable employment. This should take into account the varying needs, skills and social norms to ensure equitable access. Distinction has to be made between having no income even before the crisis and losing income due to the impact of crisis. This indicator focuses on the former.","guidance_baseline":"Pre-crisis census, other official reports, or media quoted household income types and levels. Determine rapidly the crisis? impacts on livelihood, to the extent possible specified by sectors\/type of employment, geographical area, and population segment based on damage assessment report, economic\/social welfare authorities, and \/ or other analysis such as livelihoods assessments (See ILO\/FAO Guide on Livelihoods Assessments, 2008), Household Economy Analysis, or Household profiling. Incorporate basic conflict\/disaster risk analysis as part of the overall assessments on livelihoods.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: Establish the estimated number and characteristics of households whose income is affected by the crisis to establish the scale of impact on livelihood Identify emergency responses (e.g.. cash\/food for work, emergency response-related employment, grants scheme, livelihoods start-up packs\/kits etc.) that has income transfer and \/ or income generation scheme and estimate the coverage; Phase 2: Update the estimated number and characteristics of households whose income is affected by the crisis to establish the scale of impact on livelihood. Update the emergency responses that have cash transfer and \/ or income generation scheme and estimate the coverage. Identify responses that can evolve into sustainable income and employment and share information with development actors to ensure linkage to long term recovery; Phase 3: Verify the estimations with formal records ? when necessary triangulate with field data and third party analysis; Phase 4: Conduct in depth sectoral analysis.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, F2.1 Cash Transfer, F2.2 Voucher Transfer, F2.3 In-kind Transfer, F4 Income Access, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2310","label":"Number and Percentage of households with no livelihood assets","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-7","code":"R-7","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","description":"\u003Cp\u003En\/a\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"# of crisis affected households","numerator":"# of crisis affected households with no livelihood assets","disaggregation":"Sex (male-\/female-headed household), and age","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Output","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456906435","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"Livelihood assets are (human, capital, natural, physical, social, or financial) resource base of the household that when combined with capabilities and activities will generate means of living, and if sustainable, generate the well being of a household. Livelihood assets are to be determined locally. e.g. Fishing boats for coastal community, land and agricultural implements in the hinterlands, education, skills and capitals in urban area, house, car, household utilities, land, physical infrastructure, social networks, associations, etc.","guidance_baseline":"Pre-crisis census on types of livelihood to the extent possible at household level. Official pre-crisis reports describing economic assets of the crisis-affected areas. Livelihoods assessment that include wealth ranking in pre-crisis situations; Ensure assessments incorporate basic disaster risk\/conflict analysis to ensure crisis sensitivity.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: Determine which livelihood sectors and estimate the number of households affected by the crisis. Establish up to five most critical livelihood assets associated with the livelihood sectors affected by the crisis. Determine if there are livelihood assets component in any emergency response measures and estimate the number of households that benefitted in terms of receiving livelihood assets from such measures. Livelihoods assessment that include wealth ranking can be done periodically to monitor replacement and replenishment of assets through emergency response. Incorporate a basic disaster\/conflict risk analysis as part of the livelihoods assessments; Phase 2: Update the estimated number and characteristics of households whose income is affected by the crisis to establish the scale of impact on livelihood. Update the emergency responses that has income transfer and \/ or income generation scheme and estimate the coverage. Determine that interventions are conflict and disaster risk sensitive. Determine households and individuals already engaged in self employment and wage employment due to crisis response. Document set of assets acquired due to crisis response activities. Compile the information on income earning opportunities, and assets replacement\/replenishment levels, and share this with recovery and development actors, where possible; Phase 3: verify the estimations with formal records, when necessary triangulate with field data and third party analysis. Share information with other stakeholders to enable the link between early and long term recovery; Phase 4: Conduct in depth sectoral analysis","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, F2.1 Cash Transfer, F2.2 Voucher Transfer, F2.3 In-kind Transfer, F4 Income Access, F5 Market Access, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"This will be specified in the guidance per phase: e.g. household goods, income, shelter\/housing, domestic animals, etc."},{"id":"2305","label":"Number and Percentage of affected areas with local government-led response planning capacity, with the ability to meet the needs of the enitre community in its diversity ","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-2","code":"R-2","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R4 Governance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EArea: Locality normally refers to government unit at the lowest level usually municipality\/ town\/ city. However, Locality to be defined according to context. Response Plan: Presence of recovery plan at local level indicates the relative readiness of the locality to undertake recovery activities. Recovery plan refers to organised multisectoral workplan to restore, resume, rebuild, or reconstruct with an intention to maintain the function permanently. Should be differentiated from emergency repsonse which purpose may only be restoring the functions for the most immediate term. Recovery plan may be short (up to 1 year), medium (up to 3 to 5 years), or long term (5 years or longer).Government-led refers to planning process that is either sanctioned, endorsed, or directly led by the government.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Affected areas (Areas to be defined at the national level - whether regional, district or local level)","denominator":"# of affected areas","numerator":"# of affected areas with local government-led response planning capacity","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456905715","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey","general_guidance":"Recovery planning at this level usually has budgetary implications. This should not be confused with community level planning.","guidance_baseline":"Number of localities with either crisis\/disaster preparedness and\/or contingency plan that have recovery component in it.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: Determine the lowest governance \/ administrative unit and the form of disaster\/crisis related planning, e.g. preparedness or contingency planning, emergency response, or recovery plan. Count the number of localities that have completed their recovery plans; Phase 2: Count the number of locality that have completed their recovery plans; Phase 3: Count the number of locality that have completed their recovery plans; Phase 4: Count the number of locality that have completed their recovery plans.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"The earlier the locality has a recovery plan, the higher the chance for recovery success."},{"id":"2311","label":"Percentage of economically active workforce that is employed on: a) a short term\/ temporary basis; and b) a long term\/ permanent basis","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-8","code":"R-8","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R1 Economic Recovery and Livelihoods","description":"\u003Cp\u003En\/a\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"(Total workforce) # of people in economically active workforce","numerator":"(Employed workers) # of people in economically active workforce that is employed on: a) a short term\/ temporary basis; and b) a long term\/ permanent basis. Consider the influence of the unofficial sector, such as street selling of goods. ","disaggregation":"Sex, Age","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456906603","data_sources":"n\/a","general_guidance":"Employment is work or occupational activities to which one is used or being paid wage\/salary. Short term refers to gainful engagement between 1 to12 months?; long term is an engagement with tenure more than one year. Engagement that is less than 1 month, in this case, shouldn\u0026#039;t be considered as employment. Eligible workforce refers to the number of people of working age and below retirement age who are expected to be actively in the gainful work activities or are actively seeking employment.","guidance_baseline":"Census or other formal records on percentage of employment, usually at the labour statistics, statistics office, or at the general administration office, to the extent possible disaggregated by type\/sector and gender. Determine impact of the crisis on employment differentiated by types\/sectors. Determine possible sectors that might require labour intensive work through e.g. cash for work. Determine level of demand for goods and services; Document month by moth inflation.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: Update the estimated number and characteristics of persons whose employment is affected by the crisis to establish the scale of impact. Update the emergency responses and other measures that has employment generation and estimate the coverage. Undertake rough and quick hazard mapping and conflict analysis and ensure that short and long term employment are crisis sensitive; Phase 3: Verify the estimations with formal records when necessary triangulate with field data and third party analysis. Document information and share with recovery and development partners to ensure sustainable recovery support; Phase 4: Conduct in depth sectoral analysis","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, F4 Income Access, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2312","label":"Number and Percentage of population directly affected by problematic rubble\/debris","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-9","code":"R-9","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R2 Basic Infrastructure Restoration","description":"\u003Cp\u003EDebris or rubble is the wreckage of the devastation and it includes everything that could possibly destroyed\/damaged, or materials brought about by a catastrophic event. Problematic refers to situations where such debris causes immediate physical and psychological barriers for emergency relief and recovery activities.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"# of crisis-hit people","numerator":"# of crisis-hit people directly affected by rubble\/ debris","disaggregation":"Geography, sex and age","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline, Outcome, Output","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456906720","data_sources":"Household survey","general_guidance":"The guidance per phase will specify alternatively roads, services, etc.: Depending on the situation and phase, the following might be taking into account: number of people affected by debris (example : 1 million people\/60% of the population of a city affected by debris)","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"Taking gender\/age and other diversity issues into account will allow for the prioritization of clearance based on needs of the most vulnerable. ","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E1 Access and Learning Environment, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, H6 Environmental Health, P4 (PM) Mine Action, P5 Vulnerability, P6 Displacement and Return, P7 Documentation, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"2304","label":"Number and Percentage of public sector employees (male\/female) unavailable because of crisis by gender\/grade or post","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-1","code":"R-1","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R4 Governance","description":"\u003Cp\u003En\/a\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"# of public sector employees pre-crisis","numerator":"# of public sector employees","disaggregation":"a) general administration; b) civil registry; c) justice; d) civil protection; e) security; f) sex by grade","key":"Yes","types":"Baseline","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456905480","data_sources":"Government data","general_guidance":"\u0026quot;Public sector\u0026quot; refer to sectors funded by a government budget at all levels of government, from national to local, within the defined areas affected by the crisis. \u0026quot;Available\u0026quot; refers to those being employed on regular basis of at least one month tenure. Data for this indicator can be available either at the administrative offices, the office where they should be working, or at the treasury.","guidance_baseline":"Data is usually available from past government reports or census.","guidance_phases":"Phase 1: Different data collection modules: i) To the extent possible obtain official figure from the treasury at central level or local level if possible; ii) Figures can be obtained from the media. Where possible obtain numbers of personnel from at least three separate sources and take the average. Obtain at least global data and disaggregated by sectors only when possible. Phase 2: Obtain data from authoritative \/ formal sources, determine the number at pre crisis level of employment, determine number at current level. Phase 3: Obtain data from authoritative \/ formal sources and corroborate with other formal reports\/records. Phase 4: Conduct In-depth analysis based on formal records of the government disaggregated by sectors","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"Number of public sector employees is one of crucial proxy indicators to the functioning of government in post crisis setting. Personnel management or human resources is a key component of public sector. As public sectors employees are often also affected by critical events, their availability is also affected. As situation stabilizes more employees are reaching the pre-crisis level."},{"id":"2306","label":"Number of affected areas with local government taking active planning\/strategic measure to reduce the risk of disasters","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/r-3","code":"R-3","global_clusters":"Early Recovery","domain":"R4 Governance","description":"\u003Cp\u003EGovernment-led refers to planning process that is either sanctioned, endorsed, or directly led by the government to have an effect on specific sectors\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage: Affected areas (Areas to be defined at the national level - whether regional, district or local level)","denominator":"# of affected areas","numerator":"# of affeced areas with local government led DRR initiatives","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392067475","changed":"1456905928","data_sources":"Community\/ LGU survey","general_guidance":"Recovery planning at this level usually has budgetary implications. This should not be confused with community level planning.","guidance_baseline":"n\/a","guidance_phases":"This indicator should be monitored together with other cluster\/sector indicators on DRR as the DRR initiatives taken by local government may well support building disaster risk reduction capacity at sectorial level. This activity should take into account the variety of strengths and weakness of different parts of the community to ensure the plans are efficient and offer assistance to everyone.","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms, C4 Camp planning and durable solutions, E3 Teachers \u0026amp; other education personnel, F3 Food Access, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, N3 Prevention and Control of Micronutrients Deficiencies, P3 (PL) Housing Land and Property, P4 (PM) Mine Action, S1.1 Access, S1.2 Assistance, S2.1 Access, S2.2 Assistance, S3.1 Access, S3.2 Assistance, W2 Water Supply, W3 Excreta Disposal, W4 Vector Control, W5 Solid Waste Management, W6 Drainage","threshold":"n\/a","comments":"n\/a"},{"id":"1947","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites with representative governance structures","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-11","code":"CM-11","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIt is important that settlement governance structures be representative of the population groups. These governance structures should be elected and should ensure representation\/participation from all strata of the population (women, elderly, cultural, etc.).\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with represnentative governance structures (age, sex \u0026amp; diversity)","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Site management committee; Site management committee with minority\/vulnerable group representation; governance structures should be broken down by age, sex, other diversity concerns","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1392066924","changed":"1424791994","data_sources":"DTM reports, CODs, FODs, site management reports","general_guidance":"Evidence of activities will come from a responsible reporting party, such as the site manager or government official responsible for the site. New emergencies will not have elected committeed.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 3-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, (P) Protection, R3 Capacity Building, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2212","label":"Number and percentage of displacement sites that have a formal dispute resolution and\/or complaint mechanism including PSEA","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-10","code":"CM-10","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C1.2 CCCM Mechanisms","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with organization\/ community presence with programmes in dispute resolutions","disaggregation":"Displacement site; organization\/ community presence in dispute resolution programmes has balanced representation according to age, sex, other diversity concerns; dispute mechanism users broken down by sex, age, other diversity concerns","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1392066924","changed":"1424791977","data_sources":"CCCM Cluster Meetings","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C1 Community engagement and self-empowerment, (P) Protection, (R) Early Recovery","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"2213","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites under threat of forced eviction.","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-15","code":"CM-15","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe number of displacement sites under threat from forced eviction will provide information for advocacy against these, where necessary. This indicator may not always be relevant in all displacement situations. The site and\/or protection environment may determine it\u0026#039;s appropriateness.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Total number of displacement sites with threats of forced eviction","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with advocacy activities against threats of forced evictions","disaggregation":"Displacement site,","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392066924","changed":"1424792061","data_sources":"DTM reports, CODs, FODs, site management reports, Protection Monitoring Tool reports, Site Manager meeting minutes","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 1-4","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, (P) Protection, (R) Early Recovery, S2 Shelter-related NFI, E1.1 Equal Access","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1951","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites with restricted humanitarian access","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-16","code":"CM-16","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.8 Access and Movement","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors restrictions to humanitarian actors\u0026#039; access to displacement sites for various reasons but may include: insecurity, government limitations, infrastructure limitations or others.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with restricted humanitarian access","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Type of restriction (includes accessibility, national restrictions, security). NB: Accessibility may include logistics constraints, i.e. lack of roads, floods.","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392066924","changed":"1424792078","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -  Phase 1-4","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, (P) Protection, S2 Shelter-related NFI, F1 Food Assistance, F1.4 Livelihood Recovery, F8 Agriculture and Livestock","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1949","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites that regularly collect demographic information disaggregated by sex and age to an agreed reporting cycle","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-13","code":"CM-13","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C2 Population information management","description":"","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites that regularly collect demographic information disaggrgated by sex and age","disaggregation":"Displacement site; age; sex","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1392066924","changed":"1424792037","data_sources":"DTM, FOCUS, PORTAL","general_guidance":"Evidence of activities will come from a responsible reporting party, such as the site manager or government official responsible fo rthe site.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C2 Population information management, E1.1 Equal Access, (F) Food Security, H1 General clinical services \u0026amp; essential trauma care, (N) Nutrition, P6 Displacement and Return, (R) Early Recovery, (S) Emergency Shelter and NFI, W7 Aggravating Factors","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1950","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites with restrictions on movement in and out of the displacement site","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-14","code":"CM-14","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.8 Access and Movement","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator monitors restrictions on movement of displaced population for various reasons.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Percentage of displacement sites with restrictions on movement in and out of the displacement site","disaggregation":"Displacement site; Type of restriction (includes accessibility, national restrictions, security). NB: Accessibility may include logistics constraints, i.e. lack of roads, floods.","key":"No","types":"Outcome","created":"1392066924","changed":"1424792048","data_sources":"DTM reports, Community Meetings in displacement site, camp\/site Focal Point","general_guidance":"Freedom of movement means, for example, that camp residents do not need permits to come and go and are not physically confined in the camp.","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency - Phase 4","response":"No","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, (P) Protection, S2 Shelter-related NFI","threshold":"","comments":""},{"id":"1969","label":"Percentage of users reporting delivery of the service as \u201csatisfactory\u201d and within \u201csatisfactory\u201d timeframe","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/t-5","code":"T-5","global_clusters":"Emergency Telecommunications","domain":"T1 ICT Performance","description":"\u003Cp\u003ECommon Cluster monitoring - All emergencies - 1 per year\/ cycle\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Percentage per Survey","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Outcome","created":"1383212065","changed":"1398422592","data_sources":"Cluster monitoring tool ","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"T2 ETC Coordination","threshold":"","comments":"ETC services are provided to  humanitarian actors in the field. "},{"id":"1968","label":"Information Management and collaboration platform established and maintained up-to-date","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/t-4","code":"T-4","global_clusters":"Emergency Telecommunications","domain":"T2 ETC Coordination","description":"\u003Cp\u003EIM\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"collaboration platform","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1383211918","changed":"1398422515","data_sources":"ETC Reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"T2 ETC Coordination","threshold":"","comments":"ETC services are deployed in defined \u2018common operational areas\u0026#039;, i.e. areas approved by the Humanitarian Country Team in which the majority of United Nations (UN) agencies and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are based."},{"id":"1967","label":"Number of UN agency\/NGO staff members trained on ETC services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/t-3","code":"T-3","global_clusters":"Emergency Telecommunications","domain":"T1 ICT Performance","description":"\u003Cp\u003Etraining\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Humanitarian Staff members","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1383211838","changed":"1398422515","data_sources":"ETC Reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"T1 ICT Performance","threshold":"","comments":"ETC services are deployed in defined \u2018common operational areas\u0026#039;, i.e. areas approved by the Humanitarian Country Team in which the majority of United Nations (UN) agencies and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are based."},{"id":"1966","label":"Number of common operational areas covered by data communications services","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/t-2","code":"T-2","global_clusters":"Emergency Telecommunications","domain":"T1 ICT Performance","description":"\u003Cp\u003Edeployment of services\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Location \/ Operational Areas","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1383211753","changed":"1398422515","data_sources":"ETC Reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"T1 ICT Performance","threshold":"","comments":"ETC services are deployed in defined \u2018common operational areas\u0026#039;, i.e. areas approved by the Humanitarian Country Team in which the majority of United Nations (UN) agencies and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are based."},{"id":"1965","label":"Number of common operational areas covered by common security telecommunication network","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/t-1","code":"T-1","global_clusters":"Emergency Telecommunications","domain":"T1 ICT Performance","description":"\u003Cp\u003Edeployment of services\u003C\/p\u003E","unit":"Location \/ Operational Areas","denominator":"","numerator":"","disaggregation":"n\/a","key":"Yes","types":"Output","created":"1383211575","changed":"1398422515","data_sources":"ETC Reports","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"T1 ICT Performance","threshold":"","comments":"ETC services are deployed in defined \u2018common operational areas\u0026#039;, i.e. areas approved by the Humanitarian Country Team in which the majority of United Nations (UN) agencies and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are based."},{"id":"1948","label":"Number and Percentage of displacement sites with host community representation in governance structures","self":"https:\/\/ir.hpc.tools\/applications\/ir\/indicator\/cm-12","code":"CM-12","global_clusters":"Camp Coordination \/ Management","domain":"C3.3 CCCM Mechanisms","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThis indicator may not always be relevant in all displacement situations. The site and\/or protection environment may determine its appropriateness.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","unit":"Number and Percentage","denominator":"Overall number of displacement sites identified\/estimated of the emergency","numerator":"Number of displacement sites with host community representation in governamnce structures","disaggregation":"Displacement site; organization\/ community presence  has balanced representation according to age, sex, disability, other diversity concerns","key":"No","types":"Output","created":"1381489300","changed":"1424792005","data_sources":"","general_guidance":"","guidance_baseline":"","guidance_phases":"New L3 Emergency -Phase 2-4","response":"Yes","cross_tagging":"C3 Protection and services monitoring and coordination, P5 Vulnerability, R4 Governance","threshold":"","comments":""}]